Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Weak Static Magnetic Field and Oligopeptides on Cell Proliferation and Cognitive Functions in Different Animal Species

  • INTERACTION OF WEAK ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS (WEF) WITH LIVING CELLS AND ORGANISMS
  • Published:
Technical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of exposure to two different stress factors—a weak static magnetic field (WSMF) with a magnetic induction of 200 μT and oligopeptide epigenetic regulators—were studied. The results of explant exposure to tissue-specific oligopeptides and to WSMF were comparable. Experiments on cognitive behavior suggested that oligopeptides Ala–Glu–Asp–Pro and Lys–Glu–Asp–Ala had a beneficial effect on medium-term memory formation. It is noted that external WSMFs efficiently affect biological objects due to their high penetrating capacity in biological media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 80: Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-Frequency (ELF) Electric and Magnetic Fields (IARCPress, Lyon, France, 2002), pp. 1–395.

  2. F. J. Pavon-Carrasco and A. De Santis, Fronti. Earth Sci. 4, 40 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00040

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. C. Anderson, F. J. Rich, and S. Borisov, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 177, 237 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2018.03.015

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. E. Stefanov, B. F. Shchegolev, O. V. Kryachko, N. V. Kuzmenko, S. V. Surma, and I. M. Spivak, Dokl. Biol. Sci. 461, 116 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496615020118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S. V. Surma, G. B. Belostotskaya, B. F. Shchegolev, and V. E. Stefanov, Bioelectromagnetics 35, 537 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.21876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. E. A. Nikitina, A. V. Medvedeva, M. S. Gerasimenko, V. S. Pronikov, S. V. Surma, B. F. Shchegolev, and E. V. Savvateeva-Popova, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 48 (7), 796 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-018-0632-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Kh. Khavinson, B. I. Kuznik, and G. A. Ryzhak, Peptide Geroprotectors—Epigenetic Regulators of Physiological Functions of the Body (Herzen Russ. State Pedagog. Univ., St. Petersburg, 2014) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Ya. Vakhitov, N. I. Chalisova, N. A. Balykina, L. N. Petrov, and A. D. Nozdrachev, Dokl. Biol. Sci. 428 (1), 395 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496609050019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. I. Chalisova, E. A. Kontsevaya, M. A. Voytsehovskaya, and A. V. Komashnya, Adv. Gerontol. 2, 10 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057012010067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. A. Nikitina, E. V. Tokmatcheva, and E. V. Savvateeva-Popova, Russ. J. Genet. 39 (1), 25 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N. G. Kamyshev, K. G. Iliadi, and J. V. Bragina, Learn. Mem. 6 (1), 1 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. N. Ivanova, S. V. Surma, B. F. Shchegolev, N. I. Chalisova, G. A. Zakharov, E. A. Nikitina, and A. D. Nozdrachev, Dokl. Biol. Sci. 481 (1), 132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0012496618040075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. V. Savvateeva-Popova, A. V. Medvedeva, and E. A. Nikitina, Russ. J. Genet. 51 (5), 518 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1022795415050075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O. Shoki, N. Nobuyoshi, S. Hiroshi, and K. Hiroshi, J. Neurochem. 70 (1), 299 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.70010299.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. I. Chalisova, N. G. Lopatina, N. G. Kamyshev, T. G. Zachepilo, L. S. Kozina, and E. S. Zalomaeva, Usp. Gerontol. 30 (6), 82 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. I. Chalisova, P. N. Ivanova, E. S. Zalomaeva, E. A. Nikitina, and L. S. Kozina, Adv. Gerontol. 9 (2), 186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079057019020073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. I. S. Eldashev, B. F. Shchegolev, S. V. Surma, and G. B. Belostotskaya, Biophysics 55 (5), 765 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350910050143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. E. A. Nikitina, D. A. Chernikova, O. V. Vasilyeva, A. V. Zhuravlev, A. V. Medvedeva, N. S. Domnina, O. Yu. Sergeeva, V. B. Vol’eva, B. F. Shchegolev, and E. V. Savvateeva-Popova, Biotechnol. Russ. 34 (3), 67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21519/0234-2758-2018-34-3-67-77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. L. Buchachenko, Russ. Chem. Rev. 83 (1), 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1070/RC2014v083n01ABEH004335

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was performed with the financial support of the Fundamental Research Program of State Academies for 2013–2020 (GP-14, Section 63).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. S. Zalomaeva.

Ethics declarations

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

STATEMENT ON THE WELFARE OF ANIMALS

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Additional information

Translated by D. Timchenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zalomaeva, E.S., Ivanova, P.N., Chalisova, N.I. et al. Effects of Weak Static Magnetic Field and Oligopeptides on Cell Proliferation and Cognitive Functions in Different Animal Species. Tech. Phys. 65, 1585–1590 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784220100254

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063784220100254

Navigation