Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On the Issue of Optimum Machine Learning Methods for Filling and Updating Nuclear Knowledge Graphs

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper deals with the issues of finding and researching optimum algorithms for classification and semantic annotation of textual network content in the interests of filling and updating nuclear knowledge graphs in Russian and English. Testing of the studied algorithms is carried out by the method of cross-validation. The novelty of the presented research is due to the application of the Pareto’s optimality principle for multi-criteria evaluation and ranking of the studied machine learning algorithms, provided that there is no a priori information about the comparative importance of the criteria. The features of the software implementation of efficient classification and semantic annotation algorithms as part of a scalable semantic web portal hosted on a cloud platform are discussed. The proposed software solutions are based on cloud computing using DBaaS and PaaS service models to ensure the scalability of data warehouses and network services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. https://cds.cern.ch.

  2. http://cdfe.sinp.msu.ru/index.en.html.

  3. https://www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-knowledge-management.

  4. http://www.innov-rosatom.ru/suz-rosatoma/.

  5. https://www.iaea.org/topics/nuclear-knowledge-management.

  6. http://www.innov-rosatom.ru/suz-rosatoma/.

  7. https://www.mathnet.ru/php/person.phtml?&personid=29853.

  8. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.

  9. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/.

  10. http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query.

  11. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/ bayes-theorem/.

  12. https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Vilfredo_Pareto.

  13. https://www.iaea.org/.

  14. https://cds.cern.ch.

  15. https://eng.mephi.ru/.

  16. https://phys.msu.ru/eng/.

  17. http://nrcki.ru/.

  18. http://cdfe.sinp.msu.ru/index.en.html.

  19. https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/.

  20. https://web.mit.edu/.

  21. https://www.uniba.it/it/ricerca/dipartimenti/informatica.

  22. https://www.mathcs.uni-leipzig.de/ifi.

  23. https://www.cs.manchester.ac.uk/.

  24. https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/.

  25. https://www.ibm.com/cloud/watson-studio.

  26. https://developers.google.com/learn/topics/datascience.

  27. https://aws.amazon.com/en/comprehend/features/.

  28. https://aws.amazon.com/ru/machine-learning/.

  29. https://datasphere.yandex.ru/.

  30. https://www.mathworks.com/solutions/machine-learning.html.

  31. https://nlp.stanford.edu/software/.

  32. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/.

  33. https://nti2035.ru/technology/competence_centers/mipt.php.

  34. https://2030.itmo.ru/mplatform2.

  35. https://cs.msu.ru/en.

  36. https://www.ispras.ru/en/.

  37. https://www.huawei.ru/.

  38. https://rscf.ru/project/22-21-00182/

REFERENCES

  1. V. Telnov and Y. Korovin, ‘‘Machine learning and text analysis in the tasks of knowledge graphs refinement and enrichment,’’ in Supplementary Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains DAMDID/RCDL 2020, Voronezh, Russia, October 13–16, CEUR Workshop Proc. 2790, 48–62 (2020). http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2790/paper06.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. Telnov and Y. Korovin, ‘‘Semantic web and interactive knowledge graphs as educational technology,’’ in Cloud Computing Security, Ed. by D. G. Harkut (IntechOpen, London, 2020). https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83221

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Telnov and Y. Korovin, ‘‘Semantic web and knowledge graphs as an educational technology of personnel training for nuclear power engineering,’’ Nucl. Energy Technol. 5, 273–280 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.5.39226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Telnov and Y. Korovin, ‘‘Semantic web and knowledge graphs as an educational technology of personnel training for nuclear power engineering,’’ Izv. Vyssh. Uchebn. Zaved., Yad. Energet. 2, 219–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.26583/npe.2019.2.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. V. Telnov and Y. Korovin, ‘‘Programming knowledge graphs, reasoning on graphs,’’ Software Eng. 2, 59–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.17587/prin.10.59-68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. V. Telnov and Y. Korovin, ‘‘Semantic educational web portal,’’ in Selected Papers of the 19th International Conference on Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains DAMDID/RCDL 2017, Moscow, Russia, October 9–13, 2017, CEUR Workshop Proc. 2022, 50–56 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Semantic Educational Portal. Nuclear Knowledge Graphs. Intelligent Search Agents. http://vt.obninsk.ru/x/. Accessed 2022.

  8. Knowledge Graphs on Computer Science. Intelligent Search Agents. http://vt.obninsk.ru/s/. Accessed 2022.

  9. A. Geron, Hands-on Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras & Tensor Flow, 2nd ed. (O’Reilly Media, CA, 2019).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scikit-learn. Machine Learning in Python. https://scikit-learn.org/stable/. Accessed 2022.

  11. M. Mironczuk and J. Protasiewicz, ‘‘A recent overview of the state of the art elements of text classification,’’ Expert Syst. Appl. 106, 36–54 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Minaee, N. Kalchbrenner, E. Cambria, N. Nikzad, M. Chenaghlu, and J. Gao, ‘‘Deep learning based text classification: A comprehensive review,’’ ACM Comput. Surv. 54 (3), 1–40 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3439726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naive Bayes Classifier. http://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/naive. Accessed 2022.

  14. A. Clark, C. Fox, and S. Lappin, ‘‘Maximum entropy models,’’ in The Handbook of Computational Linguistics and Natural Language Processing (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010), pp. 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444324044

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Christmann and I. Steinwart, Support Vector Machines (Springer, New York 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77242-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Classification Metrics. https://github.com/turi-code/userguide/blob/master/evaluation/classification.md. Accessed 2022.

  17. Knowledge graph named ’Nuclear physics at MSU, MEPhI’ in a serialized format (OWL file). http://drive.google.com/file/d/1HraKrUaTKOlGBG8BsYPEZImlgehxdQEG. Accessed 2022.

  18. C. Manning, M. Surdeanu, J. Bauer, J. Finkel, S. Bethard, and D. McClosky, ‘‘The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit,’’ in Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations, Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 52, 55–60 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P14-5010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. JavaDoc for ColumnDataClassifier. http://nlp.stanford.edu/nlp/javadoc/javanlp/edu/stanford/nlp/classify/ColumnDataClassifier.html. Accessed 2022.

  20. ISO/IEC 19505–2:2012(E): Information technology—Object Management Group Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML)—Part 2: Superstructure (ISO/IEC, Geneva, 2012).

  21. Machine Learning with MATLAB and Simulink. https://www.mathworks.com/solutions/machine-learning.html. Accessed 2022.

  22. S. Stupnikov and A. Kalinichenko, ‘‘Extensible unifying data model design for data integration in fair data infrastructures,’’ in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains DAMDID/RCDL 2018 (Springer, 2022), Vol. 20, pp. 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23584-0_2

  23. A. Hogan, E. Blomqvist, M. Cochez, C. d’Amato, et al., ‘‘Knowledge graphs,’’ ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 1–37 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3418294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Fettach, M. Ghogno, and B. Bennatalah, ‘‘Knowledge graphs in education and employability: A survey on applications and techniques,’’ IEEE Access 10, 80174–80183 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3194063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Grevisse, R. Manrique, O. Marino, and S. Rothkugel, ‘‘Knowledge graph-based teacher support for learning material authoring,’’ in Proceedings of the Colombian Conference on Computing (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2018), pp. 177–191.

  26. Y. Chi, Y. Qin, R. Song, and H. Xu, ‘‘Knowledge graph in smart education: A case study of entrepreneurship scientific publication management,’’ Sustainability 4, 995–1004 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. I. Aliyu, A. Kana, and S. Aliyu,‘‘Development of knowledge graph for university courses management,’’ Int. J. Educ. Manage. Eng. 2 (10), 1–15 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. De, N. Garofalo, D. Malandrino, M. Pellegrino, and A. Petta, ‘‘Education meets knowledge graphs for the knowledge management,’’ in Proceedings of the International Conference on Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning (Springer, Switzerland, 2020), pp. 272–280.

  29. X. Huang, ‘‘Study of personalized E-learning system based on knowledge structural graph,’’ Proc. Eng. 15, 3366–3370 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. K. Sun, Y. Liu, Z. Guo, and C. Wang, ‘‘EduVis: Visualization for education knowledge graph based on web data,’’ in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction (2016), pp. 138–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2968220.2968227

  31. T. Zhao, C. Chai, Y. Luo, J. Feng, Y. Huang, et al., ‘‘Towards automatic mathematical exercise solving,’’ Data Sci. Eng. 3, 179–192 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Q. Lin, Z. Zhu, H. Lu, K. Shi, and Z. Niu, ‘‘Improving university faculty evaluations via multi-view knowledge graph,’’ Future Gen. Comput. Syst. 117, 181–192 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. K. Khadilkar, S. Kulkarni, and P. Bone, ‘‘Plagiarism detection using semantic knowledge graphs,’’ in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computing Communication Control and Automation ICCUBEA (2018), pp. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCUBEA.2018.8697404

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant no. 22-21-00182Footnote 38 .

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research Nuclear University ‘‘MEPhI’’, 249040, Obninsk, Russia

    V. P. Telnov & Y. A. Korovin

  2. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    K. V. Odintsov

Authors
  1. V. P. Telnov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Y. A. Korovin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. V. Odintsov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to V. P. Telnov, Y. A. Korovin or K. V. Odintsov.

Additional information

(Submitted by E. K. Lipachev)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Telnov, V.P., Korovin, Y.A. & Odintsov, K.V. On the Issue of Optimum Machine Learning Methods for Filling and Updating Nuclear Knowledge Graphs. Lobachevskii J Math 44, 227–236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080223010419

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080223010419

Keywords:

Search

Navigation