Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Oral lichenoid reaction due to nickel alloy contact hypersensitivity
Free
  1. Kaushal Mahendra Shah1,
  2. Manish Rameshchand Agrawal2,
  3. Suraj Appasaheb Chougule3,
  4. Jagruti Dalpatram Mistry4
  1. 1Department of Oral Medicine, Diagnosis and Radiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
  2. 2Department of Prosthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
  3. 3Department of Periodontology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College, Sangli, Maharashtra, India
  4. 4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yogita Dental College and Hospital, Khed, Maharashtra, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Kaushal Mahendra Shah, thirty2creations{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A middle aged patient came to our dental out patients department with a complaint of burning sensation in right buccal mucosa and right side of tongue and an inability to eat spicy foods since a few months. Medical and family histories were non-contributory. The patient was not on any long-term medication either. However, the patient gave a dental history of fabrication of metal bridge for missing mandibular right molar a few years back. Intraoral examination revealed a three-unit white metal bridge involving the right mandibular second premolar and first and second molars. The buccal mucosa adjacent to the bridge showed a white keratotic reticular and plaque-like patch with central ruptured bullae with an erythematous halo (figure 1). The right side of the tongue in contact with the bridge also showed a reticular whitish lesion with some depapillation of the dorsum. The rest of the oral mucosa appeared normal. The unilateral lesions looked like oral lichen planus (OLP). However, based on the history and clinical findings, we suspected the lesions to be due to contact allergy to nickel chromium. A positive patch test for nickel allergen confirmed the same, and these lesions were diagnosed as oral lichenoid reaction (OLR), a name derived for having an appearance clinically and histologically similar to OLP.1

Figure 1

Intraoral photograph. Showing lichen planus like appearance of right buccal mucosa adjacent to the metal bridge.

OLR can be induced by the intake of drugs, hypersensitivity to dental restorative metals,2 ,3 acrylates, flavourings and other substances. In our case, it was due to hypersensitivity to nickel. The treatment included the replacement of the white metal bridge by a metal-free ceramic one. The resolution of lesions is expected within few weeks to months.

Learning points

  • A good history, clinical evaluation and biopsy are a must to help differentiate oral lichenoid reaction (OLR) from other inflammatory, reactive, cell-mediated lesions seen on oral mucosa.

  • Oral lichen planus (OLP) and OLR look identical clinically and histologically; however, a simple replacement of causative drug or allergic agent will resolve the OLR lesions, while OLP would require more long-term monitoring considering its potentially malignant nature and need for specific treatment, directed towards the immunological origin.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.