Skip to main content
Log in

U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry

  • Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal C Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rather than sticking to the full U(3)3 approximate symmetry normally invoked in Minimal Flavour Violation, we analyze the consequences on the current flavour data of a suitably broken U(2)3 symmetry acting on the first two generations of quarks and squarks. A definite correlation emerges between the ΔF=2 amplitudes \(\mathcal{M}( K^{0} \to \bar{K}^{0} )\), \(\mathcal{M}( B_{d} \to \bar{B}_{d} )\) and \(\mathcal{M}( B_{s} \to \bar{B}_{s} )\), which can resolve the current tension between \(\mathcal{M}( K^{0} \to \bar{K}^{0} )\) and \(\mathcal{M}( B_{d} \to \bar{B}_{d} )\), while predicting \(\mathcal{M}( B_{s}\to \bar{B}_{s} )\). In particular, the CP violating asymmetry in B s ψφ is predicted to be positive S ψφ =0.12±0.05 and above its Standard Model value (S ψφ =0.041±0.002). The preferred region for the gluino and the left-handed sbottom masses is below about 1÷1.5 TeV. An existence proof of a dynamical model realizing the U(2)3 picture is outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.S. Chivukula, H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 188, 99 (1987)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. L.J. Hall, L. Randall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2939–2942 (1990)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. G. D’Ambrosio, G.F. Giudice, G. Isidori, A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B 645, 155–187 (2002). arXiv:hep-ph/0207036

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Pomarol, D. Tommasini, Nucl. Phys. B 466, 3–24 (1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9507462

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Barbieri, G.R. Dvali, L.J. Hall, Phys. Lett. B 377, 76–82 (1996). arXiv:hep-ph/9512388

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, A. Romanino, Phys. Lett. B 401, 47–53 (1997). arXiv:hep-ph/9702315

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Lunghi, A. Soni, Phys. Lett. B 666, 162–165 (2008). arXiv:0803.4340 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. A.J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli, Phys. Rev. D 78, 033005 (2008). arXiv:0805.3887 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Altmannshofer, A.J. Buras, S. Gori, P. Paradisi, D.M. Straub, Nucl. Phys. B 830, 17–94 (2010). arXiv:0909.1333 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. E. Lunghi, A. Soni, Phys. Lett. B 697, 323–328 (2011). arXiv:1010.6069 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A.J. Bevan et al. (UTfit Collaboration), arXiv:1010.5089 [hep-ph]. And updates at http://www.utfit.org

  12. V.M. Abazov et al. (D0 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D 82, 032001 (2010). arXiv:1005.2757 [hep-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Lenz et al., Phys. Rev. D 83, 036004 (2011). arXiv:1008.1593 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.C. Hardy, I.S. Towner, Phys. Rev. C 79, 055502 (2009). arXiv:0812.1202 [nucl-ex]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Laiho, E. Lunghi, R.S. Van de Water, Phys. Rev. D 81, 034503 (2010). arXiv:0910.2928 [hep-ph]. And updates at http://www.latticeaverages.org

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Antonelli et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 69, 399–424 (2010). arXiv:1005.2323 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Colangelo et al., arXiv:1011.4408 [hep-lat]

  18. A.J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli, G. Isidori, Phys. Lett. B 688, 309–313 (2010). arXiv:1002.3612 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Kowalewski, Talk at BEAUTY 2011, Amsterdam

  20. E. Lunghi, A. Soni, arXiv:1104.2117 [hep-ph]

  21. K. Nakamura et al. (Particle Data Group Collaboration), J. Phys. G 37, 075021 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Asner et al. (Heavy Flavor Averaging Group Collaboration), arXiv:1010.1589 [hep-ex]. And updates at http://www.slac.stanford.edu/xorg/hfag/

  23. A. Abulencia et al. (CDF Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 242003 (2006). arXiv:hep-ex/0609040

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, A. Romanino, Nucl. Phys. B 551, 93–101 (1999). arXiv:hep-ph/9812384

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, G. Perez, J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 131601 (2010). arXiv:1006.0432 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. M. Blanke, A.J. Buras, D. Guadagnoli, C. Tarantino, J. High Energy Phys. 10, 003 (2006). arXiv:hep-ph/0604057

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Craig, D. Green, A. Katz, arXiv:1103.3708 [hep-ph]

  28. A.L. Kagan, G. Perez, T. Volansky, J. Zupan, Phys. Rev. D 80, 076002 (2009). arXiv:0903.1794 [hep-ph]

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. R. Barbieri, P. Lodone, D.M. Straub, arXiv:1102.0726 [hep-ph]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gino Isidori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barbieri, R., Isidori, G., Jones-Pérez, J. et al. U(2) and minimal flavour violation in supersymmetry. Eur. Phys. J. C 71, 1725 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1725-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-011-1725-z

Keywords

Navigation