Abstract
The nature of dark matter (DM) is still a mystery that may indicate the necessity for extensions of the Standard Model (SM). Light dark photons (DP) may comprise partially or entirely the observed DM density and existing limits for the DP DM parameter space arise from several cosmological and astrophysical sources. In the present work we investigate DP DM using cosmic transients, specifically fast radio bursts (FRBs). The observed time delay of radio photons with different energies have been used to constrain the photon mass or the Weak Equivalence Principle, for example. Due to the mixing between the visible and the DP, the time delay of photons from these cosmic transients, caused by free electrons in the intergalactic medium, can change and impact those constraints from FRBs. We use five detected FRBs and two associations of FRBs with gamma-ray bursts to investigate the correspondent variation on the time delay caused by the presence of DP DM. The result is virtually independent of the FRB used and this variation is very small, considering the still allowed DP DM parameter space, not jeopardizing current bounds on other contributions of the observed time delay.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Dark matter (DM) is one the biggest puzzles in cosmology, and lately in particles physics, whose existence is a hint for physics beyond the standard model (SM). Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) have been the most well-known DM candidates (see Ref. [1] for a review), but the lack of positive signatures opens new avenues of exploration. Among several extensions of the SM, a new U(1) gauge field was proposed as mediator of the interaction between DM and SM particles [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. The so-called ‘dark photon’ (DP) interacts with the visible sector through the kinetic-mixing with the hypercharge fieldFootnote 1\(\frac{\varepsilon }{2\sqrt{1+\varepsilon ^2}} F_{\mu \nu }F'^{\mu \nu }\) [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Its parameter space has been constrained through plenty of observations and experiments [5, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48], and has led to theoretical explanations for the (expected) smallness of the kinetic-mixing parameter [19, 49,50,51,52,53,54].
One of the DM candidates is a very light DP, whose viable production mechanisms have been investigated over the years [55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. Several cosmological and astrophysical constraints are applied to DP DM, arising from the on-shell and off-shell (resonant and non-resonant) transition between DP and SM photons [59, 69, 70], the non-resonant absorption of DP and subsequent heating of Milky Way’s interstellar medium [16], the heating/cooling of the Leo T dwarf galaxy [71], the heating of cold gas clouds [72], the Ly-\(\alpha \) forest [73], CMB spectral distortions [69, 74], heating of the intergalactic medium (IGM) at the epoch of helium reionization, the depletion of DM and energy deposition during dark ages [69].
A very interesting astrophysical phenomenon still to be understood, but that has various application in cosmology and astrophysics is fast radio burst (FRB). FRBs are very bright and brief (\(\sim \) ms) cosmic transients of unknown origin, discovered in 2007 [75] (see [76,77,78,79] for recent reviews). Among the explanations for its origin are mergers and interactions between compact objects, supernovae remnants and active galactic nuclei [77]. Regardless of its possible source, FRBs have been used, for instance, to constrain cosmological parameters [80,81,82,83,84,85,86], to study the properties of the IGM [87,88,89,90,91,92], compact DM [93, 94], to set upper limits on the photon mass [95,96,97,98,99,100,101], and to constrain the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) [95, 102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109].
Since the visible photon mixes with DP, the dispersion velocity of the former changes when compared with the absence of the mixing. This fact is reflected in the photon frequency, when it travels through the IGM, and as a result the time delay caused by the dispersion in the IGM \(\varDelta t_{IGM}\) may change. In turn, this change could influence current bounds on the photon mass or WEP, for instance.
In this paper we apply five detected FRBs (FRB 110220, FRB 121102, FRB 150418, FRB 180924 and FRB 190523) and two association of FRBs with gamma-ray bursts (GRB) (FRB/GRB 101011A and FRB/GRB 100704A) to investigate the contribution of DP DM to the time delay caused by IGM effects. The seven FRBs have their source measured or inferred in a redshift range of \(0.15<z<1\), whose time delays of photons with different frequencies (mostly between 1.2 GHz and 1.5 GHz) are in the range 0.15 s \(\lesssim \varDelta t_{obs}\lesssim 1\) s. The variation of the time delay caused by IGM effects is very small for the still allowed DP DM parameter space, not jeopardizing current bounds on other contributions of the observed time delay.
We organize the paper in the following manner. Section 2 reviews the necessary expressions for DP DM in a charged plasma. In Sect. 3 we present the detected FRBs and the resulting variation of the IGM time delay. Section 4 is reserved for conclusions.
2 Dark photon in a plasma
After diagonalizing the photon and DP kinetic terms, the DP Lagrangian takes the form
where \(J_\mu \) is the SM electric current.
The IGM has a plasma frequency given byFootnote 2
where \(\alpha \) is the fine-structure constant, \(m_e\) is the electron mass and \(n_e(z)=n_{e,0}(1+z)^3\) is the free electron number density, where the electron number density today is \(n_{e,0}\sim 10^{-7}\,\hbox {cm}^{-3}\) [74].
The mixing between visible and hidden photon changes the photon dispersion relation. In order to reach the appropriate expression, the Proca and Maxwell equations are solved along with the equations for a non-relativistic plasma [16]. In the case of a non-relativistic DP, which is assumed as a DM candidate (\(k\ll \omega \)), the longitudinal and transverse components of the gauge fields obey the same (mixed) equation. The diagonalization of this equation gives [16]
where \(\nu \) is the frequency of electron-ion collisions
The electron temperature is about \(T_e\sim 10^4-10^7\,\hbox {K}\) in the IGM [110], and as we shall see \(\omega \sim \omega _p\), thus \(\nu \ll \omega \) for the parameters in our range of interest. Therefore, for the purpose of this work, we may neglect the imaginary part of Eq. (3).
From Eq. (3) we have \(\omega _+\ge \omega _p\), while \(\omega _-\le \omega _p\). When \(m_{A'}^2\ll \omega _p^2\) Eq. (3) becomes
where \(\omega _\gamma \) is the photon frequency, while \(\omega _{A'}\) is the DP frequency. On the other hand, when \(m^2_{A'} \gg \omega _p^2\) the frequencies are
The positive-sign solution in Eq. (3) behaves as the photon for \(m_{A'}^2< \omega _p^2\), while for \(m_{A'}^2> \omega _p^2\) is the negative-sign solution that represents the photon frequency.
We show in Fig. 1 the existing limits on the DP DM parameter space.
3 Fast radio bursts and dark photon dark matter
Due to the interaction between photon and DP, the frequency of the former when it travels through the IGM is no longer \(\omega _p\), but given by Eq. (3).
The observed time delay \(\varDelta t_{obs}\) for FRB photons with different energies may have the following contributions [102, 111]
where \(\varDelta t_{int}\) is the intrinsic astrophysical time delay, \(\varDelta t_{LIV}\) represents the time delay due to (possible) Lorentz invariance violation, \(\varDelta t_{spe}\) is the time delay caused by photons with a non-zero rest mass, \(\varDelta t_{grav}\) is the Shapiro time delay and \(\varDelta t_{DM}\) is the time delay from the dispersion by the line-of-sight free electron content.
We are interested only in the time delay due to dispersion by free electrons, thus we can ignore all other sources of delay. This time delay \(\varDelta t_{DM}\), in turn, has contributions due to the host galaxy, the IGM and the Milky Way. However, the host galaxy is usually unknown and the contribution from the Milky Way is much smaller than the one from the IGM [112, 113], so that we can consider the the limit where the dispersion measure time delay is solely due to the IGM \(\varDelta t_{DM}\approx \varDelta t_{IGM}\). This limit is translated to conservative bounds on the other contributions in Eq. (9), as constraints on the photon mass [114] or the WEP [102], which can be even more constrained if other contributions are taken into account.
The IGM magnetic effect on the dispersion velocity of photons can be ignored because the Larmor frequency is much smaller than the plasma frequency. The time delay due to the IGM plasma on two photons with frequencies \(\nu _l\) and \(\nu _h\) is [114]
where \(\nu _{\gamma ,0}=\omega _{\gamma ,0}/(2\pi )\),
and we will adopt the cosmological parameters from the Planck satellite, \(\varOmega _m=0.315\), \(\varOmega _\Lambda =0.685\), \(H_0= 100h\) km \(\hbox {s}^{-1}\) \(\hbox {Mpc}^{-1}\), and \(h=0.674\) [115].
The correspondent variation in the time delay caused by IGM when DP DM is present is
where \(\varDelta t_{IGM}\) is the time delay when \(\omega _\gamma =\omega _p\).
In order obtain \(\varDelta t_{DP}\), we use five detected FRBs and two combinations of FRBs and gamma-ray bursts (GRB):Footnote 3
-
FRB 110220 was discovered by the 64-m Parkes telescope [116], localized to coordinates (J2000) \(\hbox {RA} = 22\,\hbox {h}\) 34 m, Dec \(= -12^{\circ }24'\) for photons ranging between 1.2 GHz and 1.5 GHz, and whose inferred redshift of 0.81 was estimated through its dispersion measure value.
-
GRB 101011A was detected by Swift/BAT with coordinates (J2000) RA = 03 h 13 m 12 s, Dec \(= -65^{\circ }\) \(59'08''\) [117], while GRB 100704A was detected by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor [118] and Swift/BAT [119] with coordinates (J2000) RA = 08 h 54 m 33 s, Dec = \(-24^{\circ }\) \(12'55''\). The association systems FRB/GRB were observed between the frequencies 1.23 GHz and 1.45 GHz [120], and had the redshift estimated using the Amati relation [87].
-
FRB 121102 was the first repeating FRB observed, in the Arecibo PALFA pulsar survey with coordinates (J2000) RA = 05 h 31 m 58 s, Dec \(=+33^{\circ }\,08'04''\) [121], in the frequency range 1.23–1.53 GHz, and is one the few FRBs that has its redshift precisely determined at \(z=0.193\) [122,123,124,125].
-
FRB 150418 was also detected by the Parkes telescope [126] in the frequency range 1.2–1.5 GHz. Although its redshift was claimed to be measured [126], its localization was contested [127]. More recently its redshift was constrained [128] and the result is similar to the original claim.
-
FRB 180924 was detected by the ASKAP telescope at J2000 coordinates RA = 21 h 44 m 25.255 s and \(\hbox {Dec} = -40^{\circ }\) \( 54'00'' \), between frequencies 1.2 GHz and 1.5 GHz [129]. The redshift of the host galaxy was determined as \(z=0.32\).
-
FRB 190523 was detected by the Deep Synoptic Array ten-antenna prototype (between frequencies 1.35 GHz and 1.50 GHz) [130] and was localized to J2000 coordinates \(\hbox {RA} =\) 13h48m15.6s and \(\hbox {Dec} = +72^{\circ }\,28'11''\). Its redshift of 0.66 is also one of the few that were determined.
The correspondent observed time delay, the time delay caused by IGM effect for the frequency \(\omega _\gamma =\omega _p\), and the (inferred or measured) redshift are shown in Table 1.
Using the seven FRBs, we apply Eqs. (3) and (12) to obtain the contribution \(\varDelta t_{DP}\), whose results are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. The observed time delay may follow this hierarchical relation \(\varDelta t_{obs}\ge \varDelta t_{\omega _\gamma }\ge \varDelta t_{IGM}\), where only the positive branch \(\omega _+\) can reach a value that would give an increase in \(\varDelta t_{IGM}\), possible only for \(m_{A'}<\omega _p\). On the other hand, for \(m_{A'}>\omega _p\) the extra time delay is \(\varDelta t_{DP}\approx -\varepsilon ^2 \varDelta t_{IGM}\), which in turn is much smaller than the one for the ultra-light DP region, considering the still allowed parameter space in Fig. 1. The results are very similar for all FRBs used and we plot only one of them (FRB 121102). The extra time delay \(\varDelta t_{DP}\) is very small to have a considerable influence on Eq. (9), therefore it does not impact the existing bounds from the other terms in \(\varDelta t_{obs}\).
4 Conclusions
In this paper we have investigated light DP DM using seven detected FRBs. These observations lie in the redshift range \(0.1<z<0.8\) and have observed time delays between \(0.1 \,\text {s}<\varDelta t_{obs}\le 1\,\hbox {s}\). Due to the mixing between the photon and DP, the photon dispersion relation is no longer equal to the plasma frequency of the IGM, but depends on the DP mass and the kinetic-mixing parameter. Therefore, taking the conservative scenario where the time delay between radio photons of different frequencies caused by their dispersion through the electron plasma is solely due to the IGM, we obtained the possible contribution to this time delay from DP DM. The results are practically insensitive to the FRBs, and the corresponding extra time delays \(\varDelta t_{DP}\) are very small to have an impact in current observations.
The extra time delay \(\varDelta t_{obs}-\varDelta t_{IGM}\) of FRB photons has been used to constrain other contributions in Eq. (9). Therefore, DP DM does not give a considerable variation in \(\varDelta t_{IGM}\), which otherwise could change existing limits on photon mass or the WEP, for instance.
On the other hand, decreasing the error associated with the determination of the dispersion measure (as it can be seen in some FRB data from http://www.frbcat.org/) and improving our knowledge about FRBs, such as their origin, will in turn be translated to an improvement on the determination of the dispersion measure from IGM. Therefore, it is expected that, in the future, better constraints on the dispersion measure will provide a reliable form to obtain better limits on the DP DM parameter space.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The paper has no associated data. All calculations were done using the software Mathematica.]
Notes
We use the same notation of Ref. [16].
This expressions does not take into account the influence of inhomogeneities on the electron number density. It was explored in [70], but does not influence our results.
Further information and a list of all detected FRBs can be found at http://www.frbcat.org/.
References
G. Arcadi, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, F.S. Queiroz, The waning of the WIMP? A review of models, searches, and constraints. Eur. Phys. J. C 78(3), 203 (2018)
D. Feldman, B. Kors, P. Nath, Extra-weakly interacting dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 75, 023503 (2007)
D. Feldman, Z. Liu, P. Nath, The Stueckelberg Z-prime extension with kinetic mixing and Milli-charged dark matter from the hidden sector. Phys. Rev. D 75, 115001 (2007)
M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, M.B. Voloshin, Secluded WIMP Dark Matter. Phys. Lett. B 662, 53–61 (2008)
M. Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale. Phys. Rev. D 80, 095002 (2009)
H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, W.J. Marciano, Muon anomaly and dark parity violation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 031802 (2012)
H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, W.J. Marciano, ’Dark’ Z implications for parity violation, rare meson decays, and higgs physics. Phys. Rev. D 85, 115019 (2012)
R. Essig et al., Working Group Report: New Light Weakly Coupled Particles, in Proceedings, 2013 Community Summer Study on the Future of U.S. Particle Physics: Snowmass on the Mississippi (CSS2013): Minneapolis, MN, USA, July 29-August 6, 2013 (2013)
E. Izaguirre, G. Krnjaic, P. Schuster, N. Toro, Analyzing the discovery potential for light dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(25), 251301 (2015)
K. Belotsky, D. Fargion, M.Yu. Khlopov, R.V. Konoplich, M.G. Ryskin, K.I. Shibaev, May heavy hadrons of the 4th generation be hidden in our universe while close to detection? 11 (2004)
D. Fargion, M. Khlopov, C.A. Stephan, Cold dark matter by heavy double charged leptons? Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 7305–7354 (2006)
M.Y. Khlopov, C.A. Stephan, Composite dark matter with invisible light from almost-commutative geometry 3 (2006)
K. Belotsky, M. Khlopov, K. Shibaev, Stable matter of 4th generation: hidden in the universe and close to detection? In 12th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics 2 (2006). p. 180–184
K.M. Belotsky, M.Y. Khlopov, K.I. Shibaev, Composite dark matter and its charged constituents. Gravit. Cosmol. 12, 93–99 (2006)
M.Y. Khlopov, New symmetries in microphysics, new stable forms of matter around us. Other thesis 7 (2006)
S. Dubovsky, G. Hernández-Chifflet, Heating up the Galaxy with hidden photons. JCAP 12, 054 (2015)
B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and epsilon charge shifts. Phys. Lett. 166B, 196–198 (1986)
B. Holdom, Searching for \(\epsilon \) Charges and a New U(1). Phys. Lett. B 178, 65–70 (1986)
K.R. Dienes, C.F. Kolda, J. March-Russell, Kinetic mixing and the supersymmetric gauge hierarchy. Nucl. Phys. B 492, 104–118 (1997)
F. Del Aguila, The physics of z-prime bosons. Acta Phys. Pol. B 25, 1317–1336 (1994)
K.S. Babu, C.F. Kolda, J. March-Russell, Leptophobic U(1) \(s\) and the R(\(b\)) - R(\(c\)) crisis. Phys. Rev. D 54, 4635–4647 (1996)
T.G. Rizzo, Gauge kinetic mixing and leptophobic \(Z^\prime \) in E(6) and SO(10). Phys. Rev. D 59, 015020 (1998)
M.Y. Khlopov, K.I. Shibaev, New physics from superstring phenomenology. Gravit. Cosmol. Suppl. 8N1, 45–52 (2002)
A. Caputo, H. Liu, S. Mishra-Sharma, J.T. Ruderman, Dark photon oscillations in our inhomogeneous universe 2 (2020)
A. Caputo, H. Liu, S. Mishra-Sharma, J.T. Ruderman, Modeling dark photon oscillations in our inhomogeneous universe 4 (2020)
M.G. Aartsen et al., Search for dark matter annihilations in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110(13), 131302 (2013)
M.G. Aartsen et al., Improved limits on dark matter annihilation in the Sun with the 79-string IceCube detector and implications for supersymmetry. JCAP 1604(04), 022 (2016)
M. Battaglieri et al., US Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter 2017: Community Report, in U.S. Cosmic Visions: New Ideas in Dark Matter College Park, MD, USA, March 23-25, 2017 (2017)
E.M. Riordan et al., A search for short lived axions in an electron beam dump experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 755 (1987)
J.D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W.R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu, L.W. Mo, T.A. Nunamaker, P. Rassmann, Search for neutral metastable penetrating particles produced in the SLAC beam dump. Phys. Rev. D 38, 3375 (1988)
A. Bross, M. Crisler, S.H. Pordes, J. Volk, S. Errede, J. Wrbanek, A search for shortlived particles produced in an electron beam dump. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2942–2945 (1991)
J.D. Bjorken, R. Essig, P. Schuster, N. Toro, New fixed-target experiments to search for dark gauge forces. Phys. Rev. D 80, 075018 (2009)
H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee, W.J. Marciano, Dark side of higgs diphoton decays and Muon g-2. Phys. Rev. D 86, 095009 (2012)
M. Endo, K. Hamaguchi, G. Mishima, Constraints on hidden photon models from electron g-2 and hydrogen spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. D 86, 095029 (2012)
D. Babusci et al., Limit on the production of a light vector gauge boson in phi meson decays with the KLOE detector. Phys. Lett. B 720, 111–115 (2013)
F. Archilli et al., Search for a vector gauge boson in \(\phi \) meson decays with the KLOE detector. Phys. Lett. B 706, 251–255 (2012)
P. Adlarson et al., Search for a dark photon in the \(\pi ^0 \rightarrow e^+e^-\gamma \) decay. Phys. Lett. B 726, 187–193 (2013)
S. Abrahamyan et al., Search for a new gauge boson in electron-nucleus fixed-target scattering by the APEX experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 191804 (2011)
H. Merkel et al., Search for light gauge bosons of the dark sector at the Mainz Microtron. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 251802 (2011)
M. Reece, L.-T. Wang, Searching for the light dark gauge boson in GeV-scale experiments. JHEP 07, 051 (2009)
D. Kazanas, R.N. Mohapatra, S. Nussinov, V.L. Teplitz, Y. Zhang, Supernova bounds on the dark photon using its electromagnetic decay. Nucl. Phys. B 890, 17–29 (2014)
J.H. Chang, R. Essig, S.D. McDermott, R. Supernova, Constraints on dark photons. JHEP 01(107), 2017 (1987A)
V. Cardoso, P. Pani, Yu. Tien-Tien, Superradiance in rotating stars and pulsar-timing constraints on dark photons. Phys. Rev. D 95(12), 124056 (2017)
R. Brito, V. Cardoso, P. Pani, Superradiance: Energy Extraction, Black-Hole Bombs and Implications for Astrophysics and Particle Physics, vol. 906 (Springer, Berlin, 2015)
M. Baryakhtar, R. Lasenby, M. Teo, Black hole superradiance signatures of ultralight vectors. Phys. Rev. D 96(3), 035019 (2017)
M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer, J. Jaeckel, Hunting all the hidden photons. JHEP 07, 094 (2018)
V. Cardoso, O.J.C. Dias, G.S. Hartnett, M. Middleton, P. Pani, J.E. Santos, Constraining the mass of dark photons and axion-like particles through black-hole superradiance. JCAP 03, 043 (2018)
A. Caputo, L. Sberna, M. Frias, D. Blas, P. Pani, L. Shao, W. Yan, Constraints on millicharged dark matter and axionlike particles from timing of radio waves. Phys. Rev. D 100(6), 063515 (2019)
S.A. Abel, B.W. Schofield, Brane anti-brane kinetic mixing, millicharged particles and SUSY breaking. Nucl. Phys. B 685, 150–170 (2004)
S.A. Abel, J. Jaeckel, V.V. Khoze, A. Ringwald, Illuminating the hidden sector of string theory by shining light through a magnetic field. Phys. Lett. B 666, 66–70 (2008)
R.G. Landim, T.G. Rizzo, Thick branes in extra dimensions and suppressed dark couplings. JHEP 06, 112 (2019)
R.G. Landim, Fat brane, dark matter and localized kinetic terms in six dimensions. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(2), 124 (2020)
T. Gherghetta, J. Kersten, K. Olive, M. Pospelov, Evaluating the price of tiny kinetic mixing. Phys. Rev. D 100(9), 095001 (2019)
S. Koren, R. McGehee, Freezing-in twin dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 101(5), 055024 (2020)
M. Karciauskas, D.H. Lyth, On the health of a vector field with (R \(A^2\))/6 coupling to gravity. JCAP 11, 023 (2010)
B. Himmetoglu, C.R. Contaldi, M. Peloso, Ghost instabilities of cosmological models with vector fields nonminimally coupled to the curvature. Phys. Rev. D 80, 123530 (2009)
B. Himmetoglu, C.R. Contaldi, M. Peloso, Instability of anisotropic cosmological solutions supported by vector fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 111301 (2009)
A.E. Nelson, J. Scholtz, Dark light, dark matter and the misalignment mechanism. Phys. Rev. D 84, 103501 (2011)
P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, A. Ringwald, WISPy cold dark matter. JCAP 06, 013 (2012)
P.W. Graham, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran, Vector dark matter from inflationary fluctuations. Phys. Rev. D 93(10), 103520 (2016)
P. Agrawal, N. Kitajima, M. Reece, T. Sekiguchi, F. Takahashi, Relic abundance of dark photon dark matter. Phys. Lett. B 801, 135136 (2020)
J.A. Dror, K. Harigaya, V. Narayan, Parametric resonance production of ultralight vector dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 99(3), 035036 (2019)
R.T. Co, A. Pierce, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Dark photon dark matter produced by axion oscillations. Phys. Rev. D 99(7), 075002 (2019)
M. Bastero-Gil, J. Santiago, L. Ubaldi, R. Vega-Morales, Vector dark matter production at the end of inflation. JCAP 04, 015 (2019)
K. Nakayama, Vector coherent oscillation dark matter. JCAP 10, 019 (2019)
G. Alonso-Álvarez, T. Hugle, J. Jaeckel, Misalignment & Co.: (Pseudo-)scalar and vector dark matter with curvature couplings. JCAP 02, 014 (2020)
A.J. Long, L.-T. Wang, Dark photon dark matter from a network of cosmic strings. Phys. Rev. D 99(6), 063529 (2019)
Y. Nakai, R. Namba, Z. Wang, Light dark photon dark matter from inflation 4 (2020)
S.D. McDermott, S.J. Witte, Cosmological evolution of light dark photon dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 101(6), 063030 (2020)
S.J. Witte, S. Rosauro-Alcaraz, S.D. McDermott, V. Poulin, Dark photon dark matter in the presence of inhomogeneous structure 3 (2020)
D. Wadekar, G.R. Farrar, First direct astrophysical constraints on dark matter interactions with ordinary matter at very low velocities 3 (2019)
A. Bhoonah, J. Bramante, F. Elahi, S. Schon, Galactic Center gas clouds and novel bounds on ultralight dark photon, vector portal, strongly interacting, composite, and super-heavy dark matter. Phys. Rev. D 100(2), 023001 (2019)
V. Irsic, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton, G.D. Becker, First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from Lyman-\(\alpha \) forest data and hydrodynamical simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119(3), 031302 (2017)
A.A. Garcia, K. Bondarenko, S. Ploeckinger, J. Pradler, A. Sokolenko, Effective photon mass and (dark) photon conversion in the inhomogeneous Universe 3 (2020)
D.R. Lorimer, M. Bailes, M.A. McLaughlin, D.J. Narkevic, F. Crawford, A bright millisecond radio burst of extragalactic origin. Science 318, 777 (2007)
U.-L. Pen, The nature of fast radio bursts. Nat. Astron. 2(11), 842–844 (2018)
E. Platts, A. Weltman, A. Walters, S.P. Tendulkar, J.E.B. Gordin, S. Kandhai, A living theory catalogue for fast radio bursts. Phys. Rep. 821, 1–27 (2019)
S.B. Popov, K.A. Postnov, M.S. Pshirkov, Fast radio bursts. Phys. Usp. 61(10), 965–979 (2018)
E. Petroff, J.W.T. Hessels, D.R. Lorimer, Fast radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 27(1), 4 (2019)
B. Zhou, X. Li, T. Wang, Y.-Z. Fan, D.-M. Wei, Fast radio bursts as a cosmic probe? Phys. Rev. D 89(10), 107303 (2014)
Y.-P. Yang, B. Zhang, Extracting host galaxy dispersion measure and constraining cosmological parameters using fast radio burst data. Astrophys. J. Lett. 830(2), L31 (2016)
A. Walters, B.M. Amanda Weltman, Y.-Z.M. Gaensler, A. Witzemann, Future cosmological constraints from fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. 856(1), 65 (2018)
Z.-X. Li, H. Gao, X.-H. Ding, G.-J. Wang, B. Zhang, Strongly lensed repeating fast radio bursts as precision probes of the universe. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 3833 (2018)
H. Yu, F.Y. Wang, Measuring the cosmic proper distance from fast radio bursts. Astron. Astrophys. 606, A3 (2017)
J.-J. Wei, W. Xue-Feng, H. Gao, Cosmology with gravitational wave/fast radio burst associations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 860(1), L7 (2018)
A. Zitrin, D. Eichler, Observing cosmological processes in real time with repeating fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. 866(2), 101 (2018)
W. Deng, B. Zhang, Cosmological implications of fast radio burst/gamma-ray burst associations. Astrophys. J. 783, L35 (2014)
B. Zhang, A possible connection between fast radio bursts and gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 780, L21 (2014)
T. Akahori, D. Ryu, B.M. Gaensler, Fast radio bursts as probes of magnetic fields in the intergalactic medium. Astrophys. J. 824(2), 105 (2016)
Y. Fujita, T. Akahori, K. Umetsu, C.L. Sarazin, K.-W. Wong, Probing WHIM around galaxy clusters with fast radio bursts and the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect. Astrophys. J. 834(1), 13 (2017)
J. Michael Shull, C.W. Danforth, The dispersion of fast radio bursts from a structured intergalactic medium at redshifts \(\text{ z } < 1.5\). Astrophys. J. Lett. 852(1), 11 (2018)
V. Ravi, Measuring the circumgalactic and intergalactic Baryon contents with fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. 872(1), 88 (2019)
J.B. Muñoz, E.D. Kovetz, L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski, Lensing of fast radio bursts as a probe of compact dark matter. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117(9), 091301 (2016)
Y.K. Wang, F.Y. Wang, Lensing of fast radio bursts by binaries to probe compact dark matter. Astron. Astrophys. 614, A50 (2018)
N. Xing, H. Gao, J. Wei, Z. Li, W. Wang, B. Zhang, W. Xue-Feng, P. Mészáros, Limits on the weak equivalence principle and photon mass with FRB 121102 subpulses. Astrophys. J. Lett. 882(1), L13 (2019)
W. Xue-Feng, S.-B. Zhang, H. Gao, J.-J. Wei, Y.-C. Zou, W.-H. Lei, B. Zhang, Z.-G. Dai, P. Mészáros, Constraints on the photon mass with fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 822(1), L15 (2016)
J.-J. Wei, E.-K. Zhang, S.-B. Zhang, W. Xue-Feng, New limits on the photon mass with radio pulsars in the magellanic clouds. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 17(2), 13 (2017)
L. Bonetti, J. Ellis, N.E. Mavromatos, A.S. Sakharov, E.K.G. Sarkisyan-Grinbaum, A.D.A.M. Spallicci, Photon mass limits from fast radio bursts. Phys. Lett. B 757, 548–552 (2016)
L. Bonetti, J. Ellis, N.E. Mavromatos, A.S. Sakharov, E.K. Sarkisyan-Grinbaum, A.D.A.M. Spallicci, FRB 121102 casts new light on the photon mass. Phys. Lett. B 768, 326–329 (2017)
J.-J. Wei, W. Xue-Feng, Robust limits on photon mass from statistical samples of extragalactic radio pulsars. JCAP 1807(07), 045 (2018)
L. Shao, B. Zhang, Bayesian framework to constrain the photon mass with a catalog of fast radio bursts. Phys. Rev. D 95(12), 123010 (2017)
J.-J. Wei, H. Gao, W. Xue-Feng, P. Mészáros, Testing Einstein’s equivalence principle with fast radio bursts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(26), 261101 (2015)
S.J. Tingay et al., A search for fast radio bursts at low frequencies with Murchison widefield array high time resolution imaging. Astron. J. 150, 199 (2015)
L. Shao, B. Zhang, Bayesian framework to constrain the photon mass with a catalog of fast radio bursts. Phys. Rev. D 95(12), 123010 (2017)
H. Yu, S.Q. Xi, F.Y. Wang, A new method to test the Einstein’s weak equivalence principle. Astrophys. J. 860(2), 173 (2018)
O. Bertolami, R.G. Landim, Cosmic transients, Einstein’s equivalence principle and dark matter halos. Phys. Dark Univ. 21, 16–20 (2018)
H. Yu, F.Y. Wang, Testing weak equivalence principle with strongly lensed cosmic transients. Eur. Phys. J. C 78(9), 692 (2018)
D. Wang, Z. Li, J. Zhang, Weak equivalence principle, swampland and \(H_0\) tension with fast single radio bursts FRB 180924 and FRB 190523. Phys. Dark Univ. 29, 100571 (2020)
J.L. Said, J. Mifsud, D. Parkinson, E.N. Saridakis, J.Sultana, K.Z .Adami, Testing the violation of the equivalence principle in the electromagnetic sector and its consequences in \(f(T)\) gravity 5 (2020)
A.A. Meiksin, The physics of the intergalactic medium. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1405–1469 (2009)
H. Gao, W. Xue-Feng, P. Mészáros, Cosmic transients test Einstein’s equivalence principle out to GeV energies. Astrophys. J. 810(2), 121 (2015)
J.M. Cordes, T.J.W. Lazio, NE2001. 1. A New model for the galactic distribution of free electrons and its fluctuations 7 (2002)
J. Xavier Prochaska, Y. Zheng, Probing galactic haloes with fast radio bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485(1), 648–665 (2019)
W. Xue-Feng, S.-B. Zhang, H. Gao, J.-J. Wei, Y.-C. Zou, W.-H. Lei, B. Zhang, Z.-G. Dai, P. Mészáros, Constraints on the photon mass with fast radio bursts. Astrophys. J. Lett. 822(1), L15 (2016)
N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters (2018)
D. Thornton et al., A population of fast radio bursts at cosmological distances. Science 341(6141), 53–56 (2013)
J.K. Cannizzo et al., GRB Coordinates Network 11331, 1 (2010)
S. McBreen, GRB Coordinates Network 10933, 1 (2010)
D. Grupe et al., GRB Coordinates Network 10929, 1 (2010)
K.W. Bannister, T. Murphy, B.M. Gaensler, J.E. Reynolds, Limits on prompt, dispersed radio pulses from gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 757(1), 38 (2012)
L.G. Spitler et al., Fast radio burst discovered in the Arecibo pulsar ALFA survey. Astrophys. J. 790(2), 101 (2014)
S. Chatterjee et al., The direct localization of a fast radio burst and its host. Nature 541, 58 (2017)
S.P. Tendulkar et al., The host galaxy and redshift of the repeating fast radio burst FRB 121102. Astrophys. J. Lett. 834(2), L7 (2017)
C.G. Bassa et al., FRB 121102 is coincident with a star forming region in its host galaxy. Astrophys. J. Lett. 843(1), L8 (2017)
B. Marcote et al., The rpeating fast radio burst FRB 121102 as seen on milliarcsecond angular sales. Astrophys. J. Lett. 834(2), L8 (2017)
E.F. Keane et al., A fast radio burst host galaxy. Nature 530, 453–456 (2016)
P.K.G. Williams, E. Berger, No precise localization for FRB 150418: claimed radio transient is AGN variability. Astrophys. J. Lett. 821(2), L22 (2016)
C.R.H. Walker, Y.Z. Ma, R.P. Breton, Constraining redshifts of unlocalised fast radio bursts 4 (2018)
K.W. Bannister et al., A single fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy at cosmological distance. Science 365(6453), 565–570 (2019)
V. Ravi et al., A fast radio burst localized to a massive galaxy. Nature 572(7769), 352–354 (2019)
H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, New stellar constraints on dark photons. Phys. Lett. B 725, 190–195 (2013)
J. Redondo, G. Raffelt, Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited. JCAP 08, 034 (2013)
N. Vinyoles, A. Serenelli, F.L. Villante, S. Basu, J. Redondo, J. Isern, New axion and hidden photon constraints from a solar data global fit. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2015(10), 015 (2015)
Acknowledgements
We thank Samuel Witte and Gonzalo Alonso-Álvarez for comments. This work was supported by CAPES (process 88881.162206/2017-01) and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3
About this article
Cite this article
Landim, R.G. Dark photon dark matter and fast radio bursts. Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 913 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08495-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08495-6