skip to main content
10.1145/1015467.1015483acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks

Published:30 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Routing protocols for wireless ad hoc networks have traditionally focused on finding paths with minimum hop count. However, such paths can include slow or lossy links, leading to poor throughput. A routing algorithm can select better paths by explicitly taking the quality of the wireless links into account. In this paper, we conduct a detailed, empirical evaluation of the performance of three link-quality metrics---ETX, per-hop RTT, and per-hop packet pair---and compare them against minimum hop count. We study these metrics using a DSR-based routing protocol running in a wireless testbed. We find that the ETX metric has the best performance when all nodes are stationary. We also find that the per-hop RTT and per-hop packet-pair metrics perform poorly due to self-interference. Interestingly, the hop-count metric outperforms all of the link-quality metrics in a scenario where the sender is mobile.

References

  1. A. Adya, P. Bahl, J. Padhye, A. Wolman, and L. Zhou. A multi-radio unification protocol for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks. In BroadNets, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. G. Andersen, H. Balakrishnan, M. F. Kaashoek, and R. Morris. Resilient overlay networks. In SOSP, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. AODV@IETF. http://moment.cs.ucsb.edu/aodv-ietf/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Awerbuch, D. Holmer, and H. Rubens. High throughput route selection in mult-rate ad hoc wireless networks. Technical report, Johns Hopkins CS Dept, March 2003. v 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. P. Bardford and M. Crovella. Generating representative web workloads for network and server performance evaluation. In SIGMERICS, Nov. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bay area wireless users group. http://www.bawug.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. Broch, D. Maltz, D. Johnson, Y.-C. Hu, and J. Jetcheva. A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols. In MOBICOM, Oct. 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. De Couto. Personal communication, Nov. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. De Couto, D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, and R. Morris. High-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In MOBICOM, Sep 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Draves, J. Padhye, and B. Zill. The architecture of the Link Quality Source Routing Protocol. Technical Report MSR-TR-2004-57, Microsoft Research, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. T. Goff, N. Abu-Aahazaleh, D. Phatak, and R. Kahvecioglu. Preemptive routing in ad hoc networks. In MOBICOM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Y.-C. Hu and D. B. Johnson. Design and demonstration of live audio and video over multi-hop wireless networks. In MILCOM, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. P. Huang and J. Heidemann. Capturing tcp burstiness for lightweight simulation. In SCS Multiconference on Distributed Simulation, Jan. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. R. Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad-hoc wireless networks. In T. Imielinski and H. Korth, editors, Mobile Computing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. R. Karrer, A. Sabharwal, and E. Knightly. Enabling Large-scale Wireless Broadband: The Case for TAPs. In HotNets, Nov 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Keshav. A Control-theoretic approach to flow control. In SIGCOMM, Sep 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Khanna and J. Zinky. The Revised ARPANET Routing Metric. In SIGCOMM, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. L. Krishnamurthy. Personal communication, Dec. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Moy. OSPF Version 2. RFC2328, April 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Park, G. Kim, and M. Crovella. On the relationship between file sizes, transport protocols and self-similar network tarffic. In ICNP, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. V. D. Park and M. S. Corson. A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks. In INFOCOM, Apr 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. E. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance vector routing (dsdv) for mobile computeres. In SIGCOMM, Sep. 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C. E. Perkins and E. M. Royer. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In WMCSA, Feb 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. R. Punnose, P. Nitkin, J. Borch, and D. Stancil. Optimizing wireless network protocols using real time predictive propagation modeling. In RAWCON, Aug 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. MIT roofnet. http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/roofnet/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Seattle wireless. http://www.seattlewireless.net/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. A. Woo, T. Tong, and D. Culler. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In SenSys, Nov 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. Zhao and R. Govindan. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In SenSys, Nov. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCOMM '04: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications
      August 2004
      402 pages
      ISBN:1581138628
      DOI:10.1145/1015467
      • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
        ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 34, Issue 4
        October 2004
        385 pages
        ISSN:0146-4833
        DOI:10.1145/1030194
        Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 August 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader