skip to main content
10.1145/1023720.1023747acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

FLSS: a fault-tolerant topology control algorithm for wireless networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 September 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Topology control algorithms usually reduce the number of links in a wireless network, which in turn decreases the degree of connectivity. The resulting network topology is more susceptible to system faults such as node failures and departures. In this paper, we consider k-vertex connectivity of a wireless network. We first present a centralized algorithm, Fault-tolerant Global Spanning Subgraph (FGSSk), which preserves k-vertex connectivity. FGSSk is min-max optimal, i.e., FGSSk minimizes the maximum transmission power used in the network, among all algorithms that preserve k-vertex connectivity. Based on FGSSk, we propose a localized algorithm, Fault-tolerant Local Spanning Subgraph (FLSSk). It is proved that FLSSk preserves k-vertex connectivity while maintaining bi-directionality of the network, and FLSSk is min-max optimal among all strictly localized algorithms. We then relax several widely used assumptions for topology control to enhance the practicality of FGSSk and FLSSk. Simulation results show that FLSSk is more power-efficient than other existing distributed/localized topology control algorithms.

References

  1. M. Bahramgiri, M. Hajiaghayi, and V. S. Mirrokni. Fault-tolerant and 3-dimensional distributed topology control algorithms in wireless multi-hop networks. In Proc. Eleventh International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), pages 392--397, Oct. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. G. D. Battista, R. Tamassia, and L. Vismara. Output-sensitive reporting of disjoint paths. Algorithmica, 23(4):302--340, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. Bettstetter. On the minimum node degree and connectivity of a wireless multihop network. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC), pages 80--91, Lausanne, Switzerland, June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. A. Borbash and E. H. Jennings. Distributed topology control algorithm for multihop wireless networks. In Proc. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, (IJCNN '02), pages 355--360, Honolulu, HI, USA, May 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Even and R. E. Tarjan. Network flow and testing graph connectivity. SIAM Journal on Computing, 4:507--518, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Hajiaghayi, N. Immorlica, and V. S. Mirrokni. Power optimization in fault-tolerant topology control algorithms for wireless multi-hop networks. In Proc. ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 300--312, San Diego, CA, USA, Sept. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. T. He, C. Huang, B. M. Blum, J. A. Stankovic, and T. Abdelzaher. Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks. In Proc. ACM International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM), pages 81--95, San Diego, CA, USA, Sept. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. V. Kawadia and P. Kumar. Power control and clustering in ad hoc networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2003, volume~1, pages 459--469, San Francisco, CA, USA, Apr. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Khuller. Approximation algorithms for finding highly connected subgraphs. In D. S. Hochbaum, editor, Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. B. Kruskal. On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 7:48--50, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. L. Li, J. Y. Halpern, P. Bahl, Y.-M. Wang, and R. Wattenhofer. Analysis of a cone-based distributed topology control algorithm for wireless multi-hop networks. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC), pages 264--273, Newport, RI, USA, Aug. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Li and J. C. Hou. Topology control in heterogeneous wireless networks: problems and solutions. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2004, Hong Kong, China, Mar. 2004 (the version in the conference proceedings has a technical error, and an updated version of the paper appears as a technical report at Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Technical Report No. UIUCDCS-R-2004-2412, Mar 2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Li, J. C. Hou, and L. Sha. Design and analysis of an MST-based topology control algorithm. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2003, volume~3, pages 1702--1712, San Francisco, CA, USA, Apr. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. X.-Y. Li, G. Calinescu, and P.-J. Wan. Distributed construction of planar spanner and routing for ad hoc networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2002, volume~3, pages 1268--1277, New York, NY, USA, June 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. X.-Y. Li, P.-J. Wan, Y. Wang, and C.-W. Yi. Fault tolerant deployment and topology control in wireless networks. In Proc. ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC), pages 117--128, Annapolis, MD, USA, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. McCanne and S. Floyd. ns Network Simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Narayanaswamy, V. Kawadia, R. S. Sreenivas, and P. R. Kumar. Power control in ad-hoc networks: Theory, architecture, algorithm and implementation of the COMPOW protocol. In Proc. European Wireless 2002, Next Generation Wireless Networks: Technologies, Protocols, Services and Applications, pages 156--162, Florence, Italy, Feb. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. M. D. Penrose. On k-connecitivity for a geometric random graph. Random Structures and Algorithms, 15(2):145--164, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. R. Ramanathan and R. Rosales-Hain. Topology control of multihop wireless networks using transmit power adjustment. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2000, volume~2, pages 404--413, Tel Aviv, Israel, Mar. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. V. Rodoplu and T. H. Meng. Minimum energy mobile wireless networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., 17(8):1333--1344, Aug. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H.-Y. Tyan. Design, realization and evaluation of a component-based software architecture for network simulation. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, 2001. Also see http://www.j-sim.org. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. FLSS: a fault-tolerant topology control algorithm for wireless networks

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  MobiCom '04: Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
                  September 2004
                  384 pages
                  ISBN:1581138687
                  DOI:10.1145/1023720

                  Copyright © 2004 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 26 September 2004

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader