skip to main content
10.1145/1029949.1029978acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesafrigraphConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A local model of eye adaptation for high dynamic range images

Published:03 November 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the real world, the human eye is confronted with a wide range of luminances from bright sunshine to low night light. Our eyes cope with this vast range of intensities by adaptation; changing their sensitivity to be responsive at different illumination levels. This adaptation is highly localized, allowing us to see both dark and bright regions of a high dynamic range environment. In this paper we present a new model of eye adaptation based on physiological data. The model, which can be easily integrated into existing renderers, can function either as a static local tone mapping operator for single high dynamic range image, or as a temporal adaptation model taking into account time elapsed and intensity of preadaptation for a dynamic sequence. We finally validate our technique with a high dynamic range display and a psychophysical study.

References

  1. M. Ashikhmin. A tone mapping algorithm for high contrast images. In In 13th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. Eurographics, June 2002. 10, 15, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. H. Baker. The course of foveal light adaptation measured by threshold intensity increment. Journal of Optometry, 39:172--179, 1949.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Chiu, M. Herf, P. Shirley, S. Swamy, C. Wang, and K. Zimmerman. Spatially Nonuniform Scaling Functions for High Contrast Images. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface'93, pages 245--253, San Francisco, CA, 1993. Morgan Kaufmann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Choudhury and J. Tumblin. The trilateral filter for high contrast images and meshes. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 1--11, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. P. E. Debevec and J. Malik. Recovering high dynamic range radiance maps from photographs. Computer Graphics, 31(Annual Conference Series):369--378, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Dicarlo and B. Wandell. Rendering high dynamic range images. In SPIE: Image Sensors, pages 392--401, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Drago, K. Myszkowski, T. Annen, and N. Chiba. Adaptive logarithmic mapping for displaying high contrast scenes. In Eurographics 2003, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F. Durand and J. Dorsey. Interactive tone mapping. In B. Peroche and H. Rushmeier, editors, Rendering Techniques 2000 (Proceedings of the Eleventh Eurographics Workshop on Rendering), pages 219--230, New York, NY, 2000. Springer Wien. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. F. Durand and J. Dorsey. Fast bilateral filtering for the display of high dynamic range images. In ACM Transactions on Graphics (Proceedings of SIGGRAPH'2002, pages 257--266, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. Fattal, D. Lischinski, and M. Werman. Gradient domain high dynamic range compression, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. A. Ferwerda, S. N. Pattanaik, P. Shirley, and D. P. Greenberg. A model of visual adaptation for realistic image synthesis. Computer Graphics, 30(Annual Conference Series):249--258, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. C. Haig. The course of rad dark adaptation as influenced by the intensity and duration of preadaptation to light. Journal of general Physiology, 24:735--751, 1941.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Hecht, C. Haig, and A. M. Chase. The influence of light-adaptation on subsequent dark-adapatiotion of the eye. Journal of general Physiology, 20:831--8501, 1937.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. D. Hood and M. Finkelstein. Sensitivity to light. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, 1(5):1--66, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. H. W. Jensen, S. Premoze, P. Shirley, W. B. Thompson, J. A. Ferwerda, and M. M. Stark. Night rendering - technical report, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. J. Jobson, Z. ur Rahman, and G. A. Woodell. A multiscale retinex for bridging the gap between color images and the human observation of scenes. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(7):965--976, July 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. W. Larson, H. Rushmeier, and C. Piatko. A visibility matching tone reproduction operator for high dynamic range scenes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3(4):291--306, /1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Ledda, G. Ward, and A. Chalmers. A wide field, high dynamic range, stereographic viewer. GRAPHITE 2003, pages 237--244, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F. A. Mote and A. J. Riopelle. The effect of varying the intensity and the duration of preexposure upon foveal dark adaptation in the human eye. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 46(1):49--55, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K. I. Naka and W. A. H. Rushton. S-potential from colour units in the retina of fish (cyprinidae). Journal of Physiology, 185:536--555, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. B. Oh, M. Chen, M. Dorsey, and F. Durand. Image-based modeling and photo editing. In SIGGRAPH, pages 433--442, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Pattanaik and H. Yee. Adaptive gain control for high dynamic range image display. In Proceedings of the 18th spring conference on Computer graphics, pages 83--87. ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. N. Pattanaik, J. A. Ferwerda, M. D. Fairchild, and D. P. Greenberg. A multiscale model of adaptation and spatial vision for realistic image display. Computer Graphics, 32(Annual Conference Series):287--298, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. S. N. Pattanaik, J. Tumblin, H. Yee, and D. P. Greenberg. Time-dependent visual adaptation for fast realistic image display. In SIGGRAPH, pages 47--54, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. E. Reinhard, M. Stark, P. Shirely, and J. Ferweda. Photographic tone reproduction for digital images. In SIGGRAPH, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Scheel, M. Stamminger, and H.-P. Seidel. Tone reproduction for interactive walkthroughs. Computer Graphics Forum, 19(3), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. C. Schlick. Quantization techniques for the visualization of high dynamic range pictures. In Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, pages 7--20, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. H. Seetzen, L. Whitehead, and G. Ward. A high dynamic range display system using low and high resolution modulators. In Proc. of the 2003 Society for Information Display Symposium, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. G. Spencer, P. Shirley, K. Zimmerman, and D. P. Greenberg. Physically-based glare effects for digital images. Computer Graphics, 29(Annual Conference Series):325--334, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. J. Tumblin, J. Hodgins, and B. Guenter. Two methods for display of high contrast images. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 18(3):56--94, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. Tumblin and H. Rushmeier. Tone reproduction for computer generated images. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 13(6):42--48, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. J. Tumblin and G. Turk. LCIS: A boundary hierarchy for detail-preserving contrast reduction. In A. Rockwood, editor, Siggraph 1999, Computer Graphics Proceedings, pages 83--90, Los Angeles, 1999. Addison Wesley Longman. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. S. Upstill. The realistic presentation of synthetic images: Image processing in computer graphics, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. G. Ward. A contrast-based scalefactor for luminance display. Graphics Gems IV, pages 415--421, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. G. Ward and R. A. Shakespeare. Rendering with radiance. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Z. Xie and T. G. Stockham. Towards the unification of three visual laws and two visual models in brightness perception. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 19:379--387, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A local model of eye adaptation for high dynamic range images

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        AFRIGRAPH '04: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Computer graphics, virtual reality, visualisation and interaction in Africa
        November 2004
        176 pages
        ISBN:1581138636
        DOI:10.1145/1029949

        Copyright © 2004 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 November 2004

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate47of90submissions,52%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader