Juan Pablo Hourcade
Benjamin B. Bederson
Allison Druin
François Guimbretière
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Several experiments by psychologists and human factors researchers have shown that when young children execute pointing tasks, they perform at levels below older children and adults. However, these experiments have not provided user interface designers with an understanding of the severity or the nature of the difficulties young children have when using input devices. To address this need, we conducted a study to gain a better understanding of 4 and 5 year-old children's use of mice. We compared the performance of thirteen 4 year-olds, thirteen 5 year-olds and thirteen young adults in point-and-click tasks. Plots of the paths taken by the participants show severe differences between adults' and preschool children's ability to control the mouse. We were not surprised then to find age had a significant effect on accuracy, target reentry, and efficiency. We also found that target size had a significant effect on accuracy and target reentry. Measuring movement time at four different times (first entering target, last entering target, pressing button, releasing button) yielded the result that Fitts' law models children well only up to the time they first enter the target. Overall, we found that the difference between the performance of children and adults was large enough to warrant user interface interactions designed specifically for preschool children. The results additionally suggest that children need the most help once they get close to targets.
- Accot, J. and Zhai, S. 1997. Beyond Fitts' Law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 97). ACM Press. 295--302. Google Scholar
- Accot, J. and Zhai, S. 2002. More than dotting the i's---foundations for crossing-based interfaces. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002). ACM Press. 73--80. Google Scholar
- Accot, J. and Zhai, S. 2003. Refining Fitts' law models for bivariate pointing. CHI Letters 5, 1, 193--200. Google Scholar
- Albinsson, P. A. and Zhai, S. 2003. High precision touch screen interaction. CHI Letters 5, 1, 105--112.Google Scholar
- Benford, S., Bederson, B. B., Akesson, K., Bayon, V., Druin, A., Hansson, P., Hourcade, J. P., Ingram, R., Neale, H., O'Malley, C., Simsarian, K., Stanton, D., Sundblad, Y., and Taxén, G. 2000. Designing storytelling technologies to encourage collaboration between young children. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2000). ACM Press. 556--563. Google Scholar
- Card, S. K., English, W. K., and Burr, B. J. 1978. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 601--613.Google Scholar
- Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., and Newell, A. 1983. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
- Crook, C. 1992. Young children's skill in using a mouse to control a graphical computer interface. Computers and Education 19, 3, 199--207. Google Scholar
- Douglas, S. A, Kirkpatrick, A. E., and MacKenzie, I. S. 1999. Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 99). ACM Press. 215--222. Google Scholar
- Druin, A., Bederson, B., Hourcade, J. P., Sherman, L., Revelle, G., Platner, M., and Weng, S. 2001. Designing a digital library for young children: an intergenerational partnership. In Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2001). ACM Press. 398--405. Google Scholar
- Druin, A. 2002a. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and Information Technology 21, 1, 1--25.Google Scholar
- Druin, A. 2002b. Age Matters. SIGCHI Bulletin 34, 5, 5. Google Scholar
- Fitts, P. M. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psych. 47, 381--391.Google Scholar
- Fry, A. F. and Hale, S. 1996. Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence. Psych. Sci. 7, 4, 237--241.Google Scholar
- Gillan, D. J., Holden, K., Adam, S., Rudisill, M., and Magee, L. 1990. How does Fitts' law fit pointing and dragging? In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 90), ACM Press, 227--234. Google Scholar
- Gregor, P., Newell, A. F., Zajicek, M. 2002. Designing for dynamic diversity---interfaces for older people. In Proceedings of the Fifth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Assets 2002). ACM Press. 151--156. Google Scholar
- Hanson, V. L. 2001. Web access for elderly citizens. In Proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF Workshop on Universal Accessibility of Ubiquitous Computing: Providing for the Elderly (WUAUC'01). ACM Press. 14--18. Google Scholar
- Hourcade, J. P., Bederson, B. B., Druin, A., and Taxén, G. 2002a. KidPad: Collaborative storytelling for children. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002). ACM Press. 500--501. Google Scholar
- Hourcade, J. P., Druin, A., Sherman, L., Bederson, B. B., Revelle, G., Campbell, D., Ochs, S., and Weinstein, B. 2002b. SearchKids: A digital library interface for children. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2002). ACM Press. 512--513. Google Scholar
- Inkpen, K. M. 2001. Drag-and-Drop versus point-and-click: Mouse interaction styles for children. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Inter. 8, 1, 1--33, March 2001. Google Scholar
- International Organization for Standardization. 2000. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)---Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
- Joiner, R., Messer, D., Light, P., and Littleton, K. 1998. It is best to point for young children: A comparison of children's pointing and dragging. Comput. Hum. Behav. 14, 3, 513--529.Google Scholar
- Jones, T. 1991. An empirical study of children's use of computer pointing devices. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 7, 1, 61--76.Google Scholar
- Kail, R. 1986. The impact of extended practice on rate of mental rotation. J. Exper. Child Psych. 42, 378--391.Google Scholar
- Kail, R. 1991. Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolecense. Psych. Bull. 109, 3, 490--501.Google Scholar
- Kail, R. and Park, Y. 1992. Global developmental change in processing time. Merril-Palmer Quarterly 38, 525--541.Google Scholar
- Kerr, R. 1975. Movement control and maturation in elementary-grade children. Perceptual and Motor Skills 41, 151--154.Google Scholar
- King, J. and Alloway, N. 1992. Preschooler's use of microcomputers and input devices. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 8, 4, 451--468.Google Scholar
- King, J. and Alloway, N. 1993. Young children's use of microcomputer input devices. Computers in the Schools 9, 39--53.Google Scholar
- MacKenzie, I. S. 1991. Fitts' law as a performance model in human-computer interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto. Google Scholar
- MacKenzie, I. S. 1992. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 7, 91--139.Google Scholar
- Mackenzie, I. S. and Buxton, W. 1992. Extending Fitts' law to two-dimensional tasks. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '92). ACM Press. 219--226. Google Scholar
- Meyer, D. E., Smith, J. E. K., Kornblum, S., Abrams, R. A., and Wright, C. E. 1990. Speed-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Aimed Movements: Toward a Theory of Rapid Voluntary Action. In Attention and Performance XIII, M. Jeannerod, Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Miller, L. T. and Vernon, P. A. 1997. Developmental changes in speed of information processing in young children. Develop. Psych. 33, 3, 549--554.Google Scholar
- Revelle, G. L., Druin, A., Platner, M., Bederson, B., Hourcade, J. P., and Sherman, L. 2002. A visual search tool for early elementary science students. J. Sci. Educ. Tech. 11, 1, 49--57.Google Scholar
- Revelle, G. L. and Strommen, E. F. 1990. The effects of practice and input device used on young children's computer control. J. Comput. Childhood Educ. 2, 33--41. Google Scholar
- Salmoni, A. W. 1983. A descriptive analysis of children performing Fitts' reciprocal tapping task. J. Human Movement Studies 9, 81--95.Google Scholar
- Salmoni, A. W. and Mcilwain, J. S. 1979. Fitts' reciprocal tapping task: A measure of motor capacity? Perceptual and Motor Skills 49, 403--413.Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. S. and Mccormick, E. J. 1993. Human Factors in Engineering and Design. Seventh Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Schellekens, J. M. H., Kalverboer, A. F., and Scholten, C. A. 1984. The micro-structure of tapping movements in children. J. Mot. Behav. 16, 1, 20--39.Google Scholar
- Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. 1991. High precision touchscreens: Design strategies and comparisons with a mouse. Inter. J. Man-Mach. Studies 43, 4, 593--613. Google Scholar
- Shneiderman, B. 1998. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, Third Edition. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley. Google Scholar
- Strommen, E. F. 1993. Is it easier to hop or walk? Developmental issues in interface design. Hum.-Comput. Inter. 8, 337--352.Google Scholar
- Strommen, E. F., Revelle, G. L., Medoff, L. M., and Razavi, S. 1996. Slow and steady wins the race? Three-year-old children and pointing device use. Behav. Info. Tech. 15, 1, 57--64.Google Scholar
- Sugden, D. A. 1980. Movement speed in children. J. Motor Behav. 12, 125--132.Google Scholar
- Thomas, J. R. 1980. Acquisition of motor skills: Information processing differences between children and adults. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 51, 1, 158--173.Google Scholar
- Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- Wallace, S. A., Newell, K. M., and Wade, M. G. 1978. Decision and response times as a function of movement difficulty in preschool children. Child Development 49, 509--512.Google Scholar
- Welford, A. T. 1968. The Fundamentals of Skill. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Worden, A., Walker, N., Bharat, K., and Hudson, S. 1997. Making computers easier for older adults to use: Area cursors and sticky icons. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 97). ACM Press. 266--271. Google Scholar
- Zhai, S. 2002. On the Validity of Throughput as a Characteristic of Computer Input. IBM Research Report RJ 10253 (A0208--026).Google Scholar
- Zhai, S., Conversy, S., Beaudouin-Lafon, M., and Guiard, Y. 2003. Human on-line response to target expansion. CHI Letters 5, 1, 177--184.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Differences in pointing task performance between preschool children and adults using mice
Recommendations
Learning from preschool children's pointing sub-movements
IDC '06: Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and childrenSeveral studies have shown that children's performance with input devices in pointing tasks increases with age. However, none of these studies analyzes the sub-movements children make during pointing tasks. This paper analyzes mouse event data from a ...
Does mouse size affect study and evaluation results?: a study comparing preschool children's performance with small and regular-sized mice
IDC '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Interaction design and childrenWhen researchers and practitioners conduct research studies or software evaluations where children use mice, it is unclear whether using different mouse sizes would affect the results of these studies and evaluations. To answer this question, we ...
Preschool children's use of mouse buttons
CHI EA '04: CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe have observed numerous times how young children find it difficult to use software that provides different functionality with each mouse button. To better learn how young children use mice, we conducted a study with 4 year-olds, 5 year-olds, and ...
Comments