skip to main content
article

Introduction to the special issue on semantic integration

Published:01 December 2004Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Semantic heterogeneity is one of the key challenges in integrating and sharing data across disparate sources, data exchange and migration, data warehousing, model management, the Semantic Web and peer-to-peer databases. Semantic heterogeneity can arise at the schema level and at the data level. At the schema level, sources can differ in relations, attribute and tag names, data normalization, levels of detail, and the coverage of a particular domain. The problem of reconciling schema-level heterogeneity is often referred to as schema matching or schema mapping. At the data level, we find different representations of the same real-world entities (e.g., people, companies, publications, etc.). Reconciling data-level heterogeneity is referred to as data deduplication, record linkage, and entity/object matching. To exacerbate the heterogeneity challenges, schema elements of one source can be represented as data in another. This special issue presents a set of articles that describe recent work on semantic heterogeneity at the schema level.

References

  1. C. Batini, M. Lenzerini, and S. Navathe. A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Computing Survey, 18(4):323--364, 1986.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. J. Berlin and A. Motro. Database schema matching using machine learning with feature selection. In Proceedings of the Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. P. Bernstein. Applying model management to classical meta data problems. In Proceedings of the Conf. on Innovative Database Research (CIDR), 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Clifton, E. Housman, and A. Rosenthal. Experience with a combined approach to attribute-matching across heterogeneous databases. In Proc. of the IFIP Working Conference on Data Semantics (DS-7), 1997.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Do and E. Rahm. Coma: A system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In Proceedings of the 28th Conf. on Very Large Databases (VLDB), 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Doan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. Reconciling schemas of disparate data sources: A machine learning approach. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD Conference, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Doan and A. Halevy. Semantic integration research in the database community: A brief survey. AI Magazine, Special Issue on Semantic Integration. To appear. Available at http://anhai.cs.uiuc.edu/home, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Doan, A. Y. Halevy, and N. F. Noy. Semantic integration workshop at the 2nd int. semantic web conf. (iswc-2003). SIGMOD Record, 33(1), 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Embley, D. Jackman, and L. Xu. Multifaceted exploitation of metadata for attribute match discovery in information integration. In Proc. of the WIIW-01, 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Halevy. Answering queries using views: A survey. The VLDB Journal, 10(4):270--294, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B. He and K. Chang. Statistical schema matching across web query interfaces. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Conf. (SIGMOD), 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Kang and J. Naughton. On schema matching with opaque column names and data values. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data (SIGMOD-03), 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Lenzerini. Data integration; a theoretical perspective. In Proc. of PODS-02, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Madhavan, P. Bernstein, A. Doan, and A. Halevy. Corpus-based schema matching. In Proc. of the 18th IEEE Int. Conf. on Data Engineering (ICDE), 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. R. McCann, A. Doan, A. Kramnik, and V. Varadarajan. Building data integration systems via mass collaboration. In Proc. of the SIGMOD-03 Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB-03), 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Ouksel and A. P. Seth. Special issue on semantic interoperability in global information systems. SIGMOD Record, 28(1), 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Rahm and P. Bernstein. On matching schemas automatically. VLDB Journal, 10(4), 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. W. Wu, C. Yu, A. Doan, and W. Meng. An interactive clustering-based approach to integrating source query interfaces on the Deep Web. In Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD Conf., 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. L. Yan, R. Miller, L. Haas, and R. Fagin. Data driven understanding and refinement of schema mappings. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGMOD Record
    ACM SIGMOD Record  Volume 33, Issue 4
    December 2004
    92 pages
    ISSN:0163-5808
    DOI:10.1145/1041410
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2004 Authors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 December 2004

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader