skip to main content
10.1145/1054972.1054993acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Use of eye movements as feedforward training for a synthetic aircraft inspection task

Published:02 April 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Aircraft inspection is a vital element in assuring safety and reliability of the air transportation system. The human inspector performing visual inspection of an aircraft is the backbone of this process and training is an effective strategy for improving their inspection performance. Previous studies have shown offline feedback training to be effective in improving subsequent visual inspection performance. Because experienced inspectors are known to adopt a better inspection strategy than novices, providing visualization of experts' cognitive processes a priori can accelerate novices' adoption of the experts' strategy. Using eye tracking equipment, we record the point of regard of an expert inspector performing an inspection task in a virtual reality simulator. Analysis of their eye movements leads to a visualization of their scanpaths and allows us to display the inspector's visual search (hence cognitive) strategy. We show how providing this type of scanpath-based feedforward training of novices leads to improved accuracy performance in the simulator coupled with an observed speed-accuracy tradeoff. We contend that the tradeoff results from trained novices adopting a slower paced strategy through increased fixation durations, suggesting trained novices learn a more deliberate target search/discrimination strategy that requires more time to execute.

References

  1. J. H. Bertera and K. Rayner. Eye Movements and the Span of the Effective Stimulus in Visual Search. Perception & Psychophysics 62,3 (2000), 576--585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. T. Campbell and J. C. Stanley. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin Co. (1966).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. S. J. Czaja and C. G. Drury. Training Programs for Inspection. Human Factors 23,4 (1981), 473--484.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. J. Doll. Preattentive Processing in Visual Search. In Proc. HFES (1993), 1291--1249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. G. Drury. The Maintenance Technician in Inspection. In Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance Phase 1: Progress Report (1991), Washington, D.C., 45--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. G. Drury, A. K. Gramopadhye, and J. Sharit. Feedback Strategies for Visual Inspection in Airframe Structural Inspection. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 19 (1997), 333--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. Duchowski, E. Medlin, N. Cournia, A. Gramopadhye, B. Melloy, and S. Nair. 3D Eye Movement Analysis for Visual Inspection Training. In Proc. ETRA 2002, ACM Press (2002), 103--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Duchowski, E. Medlin, A. Gramopadhye, B. Melloy, and S. Nair. Binocular Eye Tracking in VR for Visual Inspection Training. In Proc. VRST, ACM Press (2001), 1--8,193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. A. T. Duchowski, N. Cournia, B. Cumming, D. McCallum, A. K. Gramopadhye, J. S. Greenstein, S. Sadasivan, and R. A. Tyrrell. Visual Deictic Reference in a Collaborative Virtual Environment. In Proc. ETRA 2004, ACM Press (2004), 35--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. J. Gallwey and C. G. Drury. Task Complexity in Visual Inspection. Human Factors 28 (1986), 595--606. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. K. Gramopadhye, C. G. Drury, and P. V. Prabhu. Training Strategies for Visual Inspection. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 7,3 (1997), 171--196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. H. H. Greene and K. Rayner. Eye Movements and Familiarity Effects in Visual Search. Vision Research 41,27 (2001), 3763--3773.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. M. Henderson. Visual Attention and Eye Movement Control During Reading and Picture Viewing. In K. Rayner, ed., Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading, Springer-Verlag (1992), 260--283.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) 20,11 (1998), 1254--1259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Kaewkuekool, M. Khasawneh, S. Bowling, A. Gramopadhye, A. Duchowski, and B. Melloy. Using Virtual Reality to Support Feedback/Feedforward Training to Improve Human Performance. In Proc. IERC 2002, IIE (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. H. L. Kundel and P. S. LaFollette. Visual Search Patterns and Experience with Radiological Images. Radiology 103 (1972), 523--528.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. H. L. Kundel, C. F. Nodine, and E. A. Krupinski. Computer-Displayed Eye Position as a Visual Aid to Pulmonary Nodule Interpretation. Investigative Radiology 25 (1990), 890--896.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. B. Law, M. S. Atkins, A. E. Kirkpatrick, A. J. Lomax, and C. L. MacKenzie. Eye Gaze Patterns Differentiate Novice and Experts in a Laparoscopic Surgery Training Environment. In Proc. ETRA 2004, ACM Press (2004), 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. D. Megaw and J. Richardson. Eye movements and industrial inspection. Applied Ergonomics 10,3 (1979), 145--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. C. Mello-Thoms, C. F. Nodine, and H. L. Kundel. What Attracts the Eye to the Location of Missed and Reported Breast Cancers? In Proc. ETRA 2002, ACM Press (2002), 111--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Nair, E. Medlin, J. Vora, A. Gramopadhye, A. T. Duchowski, B. Melloy, and B. Kanki. Cognitive Feedback Training Using 3D Binocular Eye Tracker. In Proc. HFES (2001), 1838--1842.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. W. Osberger and A. J. Maeder. Automatic Identification of Perceptually Important Regions in an Image. In Proc. ICPR (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Pollatsek and K. Rayner. What Is Integrated Across Fixations? In K. Rayner, ed., Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading, Springer-Verlag (1992), 166--191.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K. Rayner. Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research. Psychological Bulletin 124,3 (1998), 372--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. E. M. Reingold, N. Charness, M. Pomplun, and D. M. Stampe. Visual Span in Expert Chess Players: Evidence from Eye Movements. Psychological Science (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Sadasivan, D. Nalanagula, J. S. Greenstein, A. T. Duchowski, and A. K. Gramopadhye. Evaluating Advanced Displays to Provide Search Strategy Information in a Virtual Reality Training Environment. In Proc. International Conference on Industrial Engineering Theory, Applications, and Practice (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. W. Schoonard, J. D. Gould, and L. A. Miller. Studies of Visual Inspection. Ergonomics 16,4 (1973), 365--379.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. E. R. Tufte. Visual Explanations: Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative. Graphics Press (1997). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. B. M. Velichkovsky. Communicating Attention-Gaze Position Transfer in Cooperative Problem Solving. Pragmatics and Cognition 3,2 (1995), 199--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. R. Vertegaal. The GAZE Groupware System: Mediating Joint Attention in Mutiparty Communication and Collaboration. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 294--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. J. Vora, S. Nair, E. Medlin, A. Gramopadhye, A. T. Duchowski, B. Melloy, and B. Kanki. Using Virtual Technology to Improve Aircraft Inspection Performance: Presence and Performance Measurement Studies. In Proc. HFES (2001), 1867--1871.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. M.-J. J. Wang, S.-C. Lin, and C. G. Drury. Training for strategy in visual search. Industrial Ergonomics 20 (1997), 101--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. J. M. Wolfe. Guided Search 2.0: The Upgrade. In Proc. HFES (1993), 1295--1299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. A. L. Yarbus. Eye Movements and Vision. Plenum Press (1967).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Use of eye movements as feedforward training for a synthetic aircraft inspection task

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2005
        928 pages
        ISBN:1581139985
        DOI:10.1145/1054972

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 April 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '05 Paper Acceptance Rate93of372submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader