skip to main content
10.1145/1066677.1066860acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

SVD-based collaborative filtering with privacy

Published:13 March 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Collaborative filtering (CF) techniques are becoming increasingly popular with the evolution of the Internet. Such techniques recommend products to customers using similar users' preference data. The performance of CF systems degrades with increasing number of customers and products. To reduce the dimensionality of filtering databases and to improve the performance, Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) is applied for CF. Although filtering systems are widely used by E-commerce sites, they fail to protect users' privacy. Since many users might decide to give false information because of privacy concerns, collecting high quality data from customers is not an easy task. CF systems using these data might produce inaccurate recommendations. In this paper, we discuss SVD-based CF with privacy. To protect users' privacy while still providing recommendations with decent accuracy, we propose a randomized perturbation-based scheme.

References

  1. Anonymizer.com: http://www.anonymizer.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Agrawal and C. C. Aggarwal. On the design and quantification of privacy preserving data mining algorithms. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database System, Santa Barbara, CA, May 21-23 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Privacy-preserving data mining. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD on Management of Data, pages 439--450, Dallas, TX, May 15-18 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. D. Billsus and M. J. Pazzani. Learning collaborative information fiters. In Proceedings of the 1998 Workshop on Recommender Systems, August 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 43--52, Madison, WI, July 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Canny. Collaborative filtering with privacy. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 45--57, Oakland, CA, May 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Canny. Collaborative filtering with privacy via factor analysis. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 238--245, Tampere, Finland, August 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. F. Cranor, J. Reagle, and M. S. Ackerman. Beyond concern: Understanding net users' attitudes about online privacy. Technical report, AT&T Labs-Research, April 1999. Available from http://www.research.att.com /library/trs/TRs/99/99.4.3/report.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Gupta, M. Digiovanni, H. Narita, and K. Goldberg. Jester 2.0: A new linear-time collaborative filtering algorithm applied to jokes. In Workshop on Recommender Systems Algorithms and Evaluation, 22nd International Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Berkeley, CA, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, A. Borchers, and J. T. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Polat and W. Du. Privacy-preserving collaborative filtering using randomized perturbation techniques. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'03), Melbourne, FL, November 19-22 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. M. K. Reiter and A. D. Rubin. Crowds: Anonymity for Web transaction. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 1(1):Pages 66--92, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. T. Riedl. Application of dimensionality reduction in recommender system-a case study. In ACM WebKDD 2000 Web Mining for E-commerce Workshop, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. A. F. Westin. Freebies and privacy. Technical report, Opinion Research Corporation, July 1999. Availabe from http://www.privacyexchange.org/iss/surveys/sr990714.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. SVD-based collaborative filtering with privacy

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SAC '05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Applied computing
            March 2005
            1814 pages
            ISBN:1581139640
            DOI:10.1145/1066677

            Copyright © 2005 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 March 2005

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader