skip to main content
10.1145/1080402.1080404acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesapgvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The influence of sound effects on the perceived smoothness of rendered animations

Published:26 August 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

The developers and users of interactive computer graphics (CG), such as 3D games and virtual reality, are demanding ever more realistic computer generated imagery delivered at high frame rates, to enable a greater perceptual experience for the user. As more computational power and/or transmission bandwidth are not always available, special techniques are applied that trade off fidelity in order to reduce computational complexity, while trying to minimise the perceptibility of the resulting visual defects. Research on human visual perception has promoted the development of perception driven CG techniques, where knowledge of the human visual system and its weaknesses are exploited when rendering/displaying 3D graphics. It is well known in the human perception community that many factors, including audio stimuli, may influence the amount of cognitive resources available to perform a visual task. In this paper we investigate the influence sound effects have on the perceptibility of motion smoothness in an animation (i.e. on the perception of delivered frame rate). Forty participants viewed pairs of computer-generated walkthrough animations (with the same visual content within the pair) displayed at five different frame rates, in all possible combinations. Both walkthroughs in each test pair were either silent or accompanied by sound effects and the participant had to detect the one that had a smoother motion (i.e. was delivered at higher frame rate). A significant effect of sound effects on the perceived smoothness was revealed. The participants who watched the audiovisual walkthroughs gave more erroneous answers while performing their task compared to the subjects in the "No Sound" group, regardless of their familiarity with animated CG. Especially the unfamiliar participants failed to notice motion smoothness variations which were apparent to them in the absence of sound. The effect of the type of camera movement in the scene (translation or rotation) on the viewers' perception of the motion smoothness/jerkiness was also investigated, but no significant association between them was found. Our results should lead to new insights in 3D graphics regarding the requirements for the delivered frame rate in a wide range of applications.

References

  1. Abbey, C. K., Eckstein, M. P., and Bochud, F. O. 1999. Estimation of human-observer templates for 2 alternative forced choice tasks. In Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 3663, 284--295.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apteker, R. T., Fisher, J. A., Kisimov, V. S., and Neishlos, H. 1995. Video acceptability and frame rate. IEEE Multimedia 2, 3 (Fall), 32--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Blauert, J. 1997. Spatial Hearing: The Psychophysics of Human Sound Localization. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., and Hunter, J. S. 1978. Statistics for Experimenters. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Broadbent, D. 1958. Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Carlson, N. R. 1993. Psychology, The Science of Behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cater, K., Chalmers, A., and Ward, G. 2003. Detail to attention: Exploiting visual tasks for selective rendering. In Proceedings Eurographics Rendering Symposium, Leuven. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Funkhouser, T., Jot, J., and Tsingos, N. 2002. Sounds good to me! computational sound for graphics, virtual reality, and interactive systems. In SIGGRAPH 2002 Course Notes, San Antonio, TX.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Larsson, P., Vastfjall, D., and Kleiner, M. 2002. Better presence and performance in virtual environments by improved binaural sound rendering. In Proceedings of the AES 22nd Intl. Conf. on virtual, synthetic and entertainment audio, Espoo, Finland, 31--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Luebke, D., and Hallen, B. 2001. Perceptually driven simplification for interactive rendering. In Proceedings of 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 221--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Massaro, D. W., and Warner, D. S. 1977. Dividing attention between auditory and visual perception. Perception & Psychophysics 21, 569--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Mastoropoulou, G., and Chalmers, A. 2004. The effect of music on the perception of display rate and duration of animated sequences: an experimental study. In Theory and Practice of Computer Graphics 2004 (TPCG'04), 128--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Myszkowski, K., Tawara, T., Akamine, H., and Seidel, H.-P. 2001. Perception-guided global illumination solution for animation rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, E. F. (Ed.), Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 221--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. O'Sullivan, C., Howlett, S., Morvan, Y., McDonnell, R., and O'Conor, K. 2004. Star report on perceptually adaptive graphics. In Eurographics 2004, Eurographics Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pattanaik, S., Tumblin, J., Yee, H., and Greenberg, D. 2000. Time-dependent visual adaptation for realistic real-time image display. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 47--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ramasubramanian, M., Pattanaik, S., and Greenberg, D. 1999. A perceptually based physical error metric for realistic image synthesis. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1999, A. Rockwood, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Recanzone, G. H. 2003. Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 89, 1078--1093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Song, H., and Kuo, C. C. J. 2001. Rate control for low-bit-rate video via variable-encoding frame rates. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11, 4, 512--521. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Storms, R. L. 1998. Auditory-Visual Cross-Modal Perception Phenomena. PhD thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Tellinghuisen, D. J., and Nowak, E. J. 2003. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 5, 817--828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Watson, B., Friedman, A., and McGaffey, A. 2001. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001, E. Fiume, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series. ACM Press / ACM SIGGRAPH, New York, 213--220. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Welch, R. B., Duttonhurt, L. D., and Warren, D. H. 1986. Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception. Perceptual Psychophysiology 39, 294--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Winkler, S., and Faller, C. 2005. Audiovisual quality evaluation of low-bitrate video. In SPIE/IS & T Human Vision and Electronic Imaging, vol. 5666, 139--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Yee, H., Pattanaik, S., and Greenberg, D. 2001. Spatiotemporal sensitivity and visual attention for efficient rendering of dynamic environments. In ACM Transactions on Computer Graphics, M. Cohen, Ed., Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, vol. 20, 39--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The influence of sound effects on the perceived smoothness of rendered animations

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          APGV '05: Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
          August 2005
          187 pages
          ISBN:1595931392
          DOI:10.1145/1080402

          Copyright © 2005 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 August 2005

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate19of33submissions,58%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader