Douglass B. Lee
Abstract
The task in this paper is to evaluate, in some detail,, the fundamental flaws in attempts to construct and use large models and to examine the planning context in which the models, like dinosaurs, collapsed rather than evolved. The conclusions can be summarized in three points:1. In general, none of the goals held out for large-scale models have been achieved, and there is little reason to expect anything different in the future.
Recommendations
Large-scale argument visualization (LSAV)
EuroVis '16: Proceedings of the Eurographics / IEEE VGTC Conference on Visualization: PostersArguments are structures of premises and conclusions that underpin rational reasoning processes. Within complex knowledge domains, especially if they are contentious, argument structures can become large and complex. Visualization tools have been ...
Towards large scale argumentation support on the semantic web
AAAI'07: Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 2This paper lays theoretical and software foundations for a World Wide Argument Web (WWAW): a large-scale Web of inter-connected arguments posted by individuals to express their opinions in a structured manner. First, we extend the recently proposed ...
Making Large-Scale Models Manageable: Modeling from an Operations Management Perspective
While building complex models is an important part of operations research practice, OR workers have focused too often on modeling's technical aspects instead of making the models manageable, that is, designing them around the ways people will operate ...
Comments