skip to main content
10.1145/1107548.1107591acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessoc-eusaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Analyzing features for activity recognition

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Human activity is one of the most important ingredients of context information. In wearable computing scenarios, activities such as walking, standing and sitting can be inferred from data provided by body-worn acceleration sensors. In such settings, most approaches use a single set of features, regardless of which activity to be recognized. In this paper we show that recognition rates can be improved by careful selection of individual features for each activity. We present a systematic analysis of features computed from a real-world data set and show how the choice of feature and the window length over which the feature is computed affects the recognition rates for different activities. Finally, we give a recommendation of suitable features and window lengths for a set of common activities.

References

  1. Bao, L., & Intille, S. (2004, April). Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In Proc. pervasive, (p. 1--17). Vienna, Austria: Springer-Verlag Heidelberg: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Heinz, E., Kunze, K.-S., Sulistyo, S., Junker, H., Lukowicz, P., & Troester, G. (2003, November). Experimental evaluation of variations of primary features used for accelerometric context recognition. In Proc. eusai, lncs, (Vol. 2875, p. 252 -- 263). Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kern, N., Schiele, B., & Schmidt, A. (2003, November). Multi-sensor activity context detection for wearable computing. In Proc. eusai, Incs, (Vol. 2875, p. 220--232). Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Krause, A., Siewiorek, D., Smailagic, A., & Farringdon, J. (2003, October). Unsupervised, dynamic identification of physiological and activity context in wearable computing. In Proc. iswc, (p. 88--97). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Laerhoven, K. van, & Gellersen, H.-W. (2004. Nov). Spine vs. porcupine: a study in distributed wearable activity recognition. In Proc. iswc. Washington DC, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lee, S.-W., & Mase, K. (2002). Activity and location recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Pervasive, 1 (3), 24--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jonathan Lester, Tanzeem Choudhury, Nicky Kern, Gaetano Borriello, Blake Hannaford (2005, July). A Hybrid Discriminative/Generative Approach for Modeling Human Activities. To appear in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Articial Intelligence (IJCAI-05), Edinburgh, Scotland, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mantyjarvi, J., Himberg, J., & Seppanen, T. (2001). Recognizing human motion with multiple acceleration sensors. 747--752.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nishkam Ravi et al. (2005, July). Activity recognition from accelerometer data. To appear in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, 11--18. Menlo Park, Calif.: AAAI Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    sOc-EUSAI '05: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies
    October 2005
    316 pages
    ISBN:1595933042
    DOI:10.1145/1107548

    Copyright © 2005 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 12 October 2005

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader