skip to main content
article

Anaphora resolution by antecedent identification followed by anaphoricity determination

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 December 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We propose a machine learning-based approach to noun-phrase anaphora resolution that combines the advantages of previous learning-based models while overcoming their drawbacks. Our anaphora resolution process reverses the order of the steps in the classification-then-search model proposed by Ng and Cardie [2002b], inheriting all the advantages of that model. We conducted experiments on resolving noun-phrase anaphora in Japanese. The results show that with the selection-then-classification-based modifications, our proposed model outperforms earlier learning-based approaches.

References

  1. Baldwin, B. 1995. Cogniac: A discourse processing engine. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bean, D. L. and Riloff, E. 1999. Corpus-based identification of non-anaphoric noun phrases. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 373--380. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Brennan, S. E., Friedman, M. W., and Pollard, C. 1987. A centering approach to pronouns. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 155--162. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ge, N., Hale, J., and Charniak, E. 1998. A statistical approach to anaphora resolution. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Very Large Corpora. 161--170.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grosz, B. J., Joshi, A. K., and Weinstein, S. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21, 2, 203--226. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Iida, R., Inui, K., Takamura, H., and Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Incorporating contextual cues in trainable models for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) Workshop on The Computational Treatment of Anaphora. 23--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kudo, T. and Matsumoto, Y. 2002. Japanese dependency analysis using cascaded chunking. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Natural Language Learning 2002 (CoNLL). 63--69. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lappin, S. and Leass, H. J. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics, 20, 4, 535--561. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Matsumoto, Y., Kitauchi, A., Yamashita, T., Hirano, Y., Matsuda, H., Takaoka, K., and Asahara, M. 2000. Morphological Analysis System ChaSen version 2.2.1 Manual.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. McCallum, A. and Wellner, B. 2003. Object consolidation by graph partitioning with a conditionally trained distance metric. In Proceedings of the KDD-2003 Workshop on Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, and Object Consolidation. 19--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. McCarthy, J. F. and Lehnert, W. G. 1995. Using decision trees for coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). 1050--1055. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mitkov, R. 1997. Factors in anaphora resolution: they are not the only things that matter. a case study based on two different approaches. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) and the 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL) Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Nakaiwa, H. and Shirai, S. 1996. Anaphora resolution of japanese zero pronouns with deictic reference. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). 812--817. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Natural Language Research Institute. 1964. Burui Goi Hyo (in Japanese). Shuuei Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Ng, V. 2004. Learning noun phrase anaphoricity to improve coreference resolution: Issues in representation and optimization. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 152--159. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ng, V. and Cardie, C. 2002a. Improving machine learning approaches to coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 104--111. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ng, V. and Cardie, C. 2002b. Identifying anaphoric and non-anaphoric noun phrases to improve coreference resolution. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). 730--736. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ng, V. and Cardie, C. 2002c. Combining sample selection and error-driven pruning for machine learning of coreference rules. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 55--62. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Okumura, M. and Tamura, K. 1996. Zero pronoun resolution in japanese discourse based on centering theory. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING). 871--876. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Poesio, M., Uryupina, O., Vieira, R., Alexandrov-Kabadjov, M., and Goulart, R. 2004. Discourse-new detectors for definite description resolution: A survey and a preliminary proposal. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) Workshop on Reference Resolution and its Applications. 47--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Soon, W. M., Ng, H. T., and Lim, D. C. Y. 2001. A machine learning approach to coreference resolution of noun phrases. Computational Linguistics, 27, 4, 521--544. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Strube, M. and Müller, C. 2003. A machine learning approach to pronoun resolution in spoken dialogue. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 168--175. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Uryupina, O. 2003. High-precision identification of discourse new and unique noun phrases. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) Student Research Workshop. 80--86. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Vapnik, V. N. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. Adaptive and Learning Systems for Signal Processing Communications, and control. Wiley, New York. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang, X., Zhou, G., Su, J., and Tan, C. L. 2003. Coreference resolution using competition learning approach. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 176--183. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Anaphora resolution by antecedent identification followed by anaphoricity determination

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader