skip to main content
article

High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten

Published:01 December 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The seeming contradiction between “banner blindness” and Web users' complaints about distracting advertisements motivates a pair of experiments into the effect of banner ads on visual search. Experiment 1 measures perceived cognitive workload and search times for short words with two banners on the screen. Four kinds of banners were examined: (1) animated commercial, (2) static commercial, (3) cyan with flashing text, and (4) blank. Using NASA's Task Load Index, participants report increased workload under flashing text banners. Experiment 2 investigates search through news headlines at two levels of difficulty: exact matches and matches requiring semantic interpretation. Results show both animated and static commercial banners decrease visual search speeds. Eye tracking data reveal people rarely look directly at banners. A post hoc memory test confirms low banner recall and, surprisingly, that animated banners are more difficult to remember than static look-alikes. Results have implications for cognitive modeling and Web design.

References

  1. Abrams, R. A., Meyer, D. E., and Kornblum, S. 1990. Eye-hand coordination: Oculomotor control in rapid aimed limb movements. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Percep. Perform. 16, 248--267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacon, W. F. and Egeth, H. E. 1994. Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percep. Psychophys. 55, 485--496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayles, M. 2002. Designing online banner advertisements: Should we animate? In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minneapolis, MN. (April) ACM Press, New York, 363--368. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Benway, J. P. and Lane, D. M. 1998. Banner blindness: Web searchers often miss “obvious” links. Internetworking 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brumby, D. P. and Howes, A. 2004. Good enough but I'll just check: Web-page search as attentional refocusing. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Pittsburgh, PA. (Aug.), 46--51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Diaper, D. and Waelend, P. 2000. World Wide Web working whilst ignoring graphics: Good news for Web page designers. Interact. with Comput. 13, 163--181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Enns, J. T., Austen, E. L., Di lollo, V., Rauschenberger, R., and Yantis, S. 2001. New objects dominate luminance transients in setting attentional priority. J. Experimen. Psych. Human Percep. Perform. 27, 1287--1302.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., Paul, J., Rangnekar, A., Shon, J., Swani, P., and Treinen, M. 2001. What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA. (April), ACM Press, New York, 61--68. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Folk, C. L. and Remington, R. W. 1998. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. J. Experimen. Psych. Human Percep. Perform. 24, 847--858.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., and Johnston, J. C. 1992. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Percep. Perform. 18, 1030--1044.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Franconeri, S. L. and Simons, D. J. 2003. Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Percep. Psychophy. 65, 999--1010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. 1966. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. John Wiley, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart, S. and Staveland, L. E. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hillstrom, A. P. and Yantis, S. 1994. Visual motion and attentional capture. Percep. Psychophy. 55, 399--411.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hornof, A. J. 2001. Visual search and mouse-pointing in labeled versus unlabeled two-dimensional visual hierarchies. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interac., 8, 171--197. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Interactive Advertising Bureau. 2001. IAB/Dynamic Logic ad unit effectiveness study. Available at http://www.iab.net/resources/dynamic_lbrandrl.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonides, J. and Yantis, S. 1988. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset as an attention-capturing property. Percep. Psychophy. 43, 346--354.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielsen, J. and Tahir, M. 2001. Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. New Riders, Indianapolis, IN. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pagendarm, M. and Schaumburg, H. 2001. Why are users banner-blind? The impact of navigation style on the perception of Web banners. J. Digital Inform. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pashler, H. 2001. Involuntary orienting to flashing distractors in delayed search? In Attraction, Distraction, and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture, C. Folk and B. Gibson, Eds. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Post, R. B., Welch, R. B., and Bridgeman, B. 2003. Perception and action: Two modes of processing visual information. In Visual Perception: The Influence of H. W. Leibowitz, J. Andre and D. A. Owens, Eds. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, 143--154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Prinzmetal, W., McCool, C., and Park, S. 2005. Attention: Reaction time and accuracy reveal different mechanisms. J. Experiment. Psych. General 134, 73--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Remington, R. W., Folk, C. L., and McLean, J. P. 2001. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Percep. Psychophys. 63, 298--307.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., and Yantis, S. 1992. Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets. Percep. Psychophys. 51, 279--290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Rohrer, C. and Boyd, J. 2004. The rise of intrusive online advertising and the response of user experience research at Yahoo!. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, (April), ACM Press, New York, NY, 1085--1086. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rowe, N. C., Coffman, J., Degirmenci, Y., Hall, S., Lee, S., and Williams, C. 2002. Automatic removal of advertising from Web-page display. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (July), Portland, OR. 406. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Schumacher, E. H., Lauber, E. J., Glass, J. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Gmeindl, L., Kieras, D. E., and Meyer, D. E. 1999. Concurrent response-selection processes in dual-task performance: Evidence for adaptive executive control of task scheduling. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Percep. Perform. 25, 791--814.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sears, A. and Shneiderman, B. 1994. Split menus: Effectively using selection frequency to organize menus. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interac. 1, 27--51. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Theeuwes, J. 1991. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Percep. Psychophys. 50, 184--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Yantis, S. 2000. Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. Attention Perform. 18, 73--103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yantis, S. and Egeth, H. E. 1999. On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Percep. Perform. 25, 661--676.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Yantis, S. and Jonides, J. 1990. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Percep. Perform. 16, 121--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang, P. 2000. The effects of animation on information seeking performance on the World Wide Web: Securing attention or interfering with primary tasks? J. Assoc. Informat. Syst. 1, 1--28. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. High-cost banner blindness: Ads increase perceived workload, hinder visual search, and are forgotten

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader