skip to main content
article

Propositional-logic approach to one-shot multi issue bilateral negotiation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 January 2006Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Semantic-based e-marketplaces have emerged in recent years, to ease the initial phase of transaction in e-marketplaces, where demand/supply descriptions can be complex and expressive.With the - long term - aim of building an e-marketplace fully exploiting rich semantic descriptions in all stages of a transaction, in this paper we propose a semantic-oriented approach to multi issue bilateral negotiation, which exploits a simple propositional logic. We present the theoretical setting, the negotiation protocol, whose outcome is Pareto-efficient, and illustrate the behavior with a simple example.

References

  1. BERLIANT, M. AND DUNZ, K. 2004. A foundation of location theory: existence of equilibrium, the welfare theorems and core. Journal of Mathematical Economics 40, 593-618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. BERLIANT, M., THOMSON, W., AND DUNZ, K. 1992. On the fair division of a heterogeneous commodity. Journal of Mathematical Economics 21, 201-216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. BINMORE, K. 1992. Fun and Games. A Text on Game Theory. D. C. Heath and Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CHATTERJEE, K. AND LEE, C. C. 1998. Bargaining and search with incomplete information about outside options. Games and Economic Behavior 22, 203-237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. CUNYAT, A. 1998. Strategic negotiations and outside options. Tech. rep., Department of Economic Analysis, University of Valencia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. GANTNER, A. 2002. Bargaining, search and outside options. Tech. rep., Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. GERDING, E. H., VAN BRAGT, D. D. B. AND POUTRE, J. A. L. 2000. Scientific approaches and techniques for negotiation: a game theoretic and artificial intelligence perspective. Tech. rep., SEN-R0005, CWI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. JENNINGS, N., FARATIN, P., LOMUSCIO, A., PARSONS, S., WOOLDRIDGE, M. AND SIERRA, C. 2001. Automated negotiation: prospects, methods and challenges. Int. J. of Group Decision and Negotiation 10, Num. 2, 199-215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. S. ROSENSCHEIN and G. ZLOTKIN. 1994. Rules of Encounter. MIT Press,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. LAI, G., LI, C., SYCARA, K., AND GIAMPAPA, J. 2004. Literature review on multiattribute negotiations. Tech. rep., Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University. December.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. LI, C., GIAMPAPA, J., AND SYCARA, K. 2003. A review of research literature on bilateral negotiations. Tech. rep., Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. LI, C., GIAMPAPA, J., AND SYCARA, K. 2004. Bilateral negotiation decisions with uncertain dynamic outside options. In Proc. of The First IEEE Intl. Workshop on Electronic Contracting. IEEE Computer Society, 54-61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. MACCHERONI, F. AND MARINACCI, M. 2003. How to cut a pizza fairly: fair division with decreasing marginal evaluations. Social Choice and Welfare 20, 457-465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. MUTHOO, A. 1995. On the strategic role of outside options in bilateral bargaining. Operations Research 43(2), 292-297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. NASH, J. F. 1950. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18 (2), 155-162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. POMEROL, J. AND BARBA-ROMERO, S. 2000. Multicriterion Decision Making in Management. Kluwer Series in Operation Research. Kluwer Academic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. RAIFFA, H. 1982. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. RAIFFA, H., RICHARDSON, J., AND METCALFE, D. 2002. Negotiation Analysis - The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. RUBINSTEIN, A. 1982. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica vol. 50, 97-109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. RUSSELL, S. AND NORVIG, P. 2003. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education-Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Propositional-logic approach to one-shot multi issue bilateral negotiation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader