ABSTRACT
We discuss the legacy and processes of creative design, and differentiate it from the type of user-centered design commonly found in CHI. We provide an example of this process, and discuss how design practice constitutes an essential mode of inquiry. We argue the complementary nature of creative design and user-centered design practices. Syncretic disciplines shift and drift from their original practice. A key issue is how CHI is to respond to changes in acceptable design practice. A key contribution of this work is an illustrative example showing how designers can communicate their intellectual rigor to the CHI community.
- Biggs, M. A. R (2002). Introduction. In Proceedings of the Research into Practice Conference.Google Scholar
- Button, G. (2000). The ethnographic tradition and design. Design Studies. 21: 319--332.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Card, S., Moran, T., and Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carroll, J.M. (1997). Rethinking minimalism. Minimalism beyond the Nurnberg Funnel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Carroll, J.M., Kellogg, W.A., and Rosson, M.B. (1991). The task-artifact cycle. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Conklin, J. and Begeman, M.L. (1988). gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Erickson, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M. and Wolf, T. Social translucence: Designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible."" Communications of the ACM, 45(4). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of CHI 2003. ACM, pp. 225--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., Ostwald, J., Stahl, G., and Sumner, T. (1993). Embedding computer-based critics in the contexts of design. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of INTERCHI'93, pp. 157--164. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gaver, W.W. (2000). Science vs. design. Plenary talk at DIS 2000, Brooklyn, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Gaver, W.W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. (1999). Cultural probes. interactions, Jan + Feb, p. 21--29. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gedenryd, H. (1998). How designers work: Cognitive studies. PhD dissertation, Lund University. http://www.lucs.lu.se/People/ Henrik.Gedenryd/HowDesignersWork/Google Scholar
- Good, M., Spine, T.M., Whiteside, J., and George, P. (1986). User-derived impact analysis as a tool for usability engineering. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of CHI'86. ACM, 241--246. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gould, J. and Boies, S. (1983). Human factors challenges in creating a principal support office system: The speech filing system approach. ACM TOIS, 1(4), pp. 273--298. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnsey, R. (1995). The design process -- Does it exist? A critical review of published models for the design process in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 5: 199--217.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Löwgren, J. (1995). Applying design methodology to software development. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems, DIS'95. ACM, pp. 87--95. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nelson, H.G., and Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way. Englewood Cliffs, Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
- Rittel, H. and Webber, M.M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology, pp. 135-144. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Schoen, D. (1983). From technical rationality to reflection-in-action. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whiteside, J. and Wixon, D. (1987). Improving human-computer interaction: A quest for cognitive science. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wixon, D., Holtzblatt, K., and Knox, S. (1990). Contextual design: An emergent view of system design. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of CHI'90. ACM, pp. 329--336. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wolf, C.G., Carroll, J.M., Landauer, T.K., John, B.E., and Whiteside, J. (1989). The role of laboratory experiments in HCI: Help.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI
Recommendations
Design-oriented human-computer interaction
CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWe argue that HCI has emerged as a design-oriented field of research, directed at large towards innovation, design, and construction of new kinds of information and interaction technology. But the understanding of such an attitude to research in terms ...
On the development of electronic design tools and associated guidelines for supporting the early stages of the design process
DESIRE '11: Procedings of the Second Conference on Creativity and Innovation in DesignAccording to the user-centred design (UCD) philosophy, users should be involved as much as possible in the different stages of the design process, to optimize the likelihood that design proposals will be appreciated by users. In this paper, first we ...
Toward a theory for the design of human technologies
OzCHI '14: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of DesignDesign is increasingly becoming a part of the university curriculum and research agenda. A theory about the process and practice of design might be important to establish design as a main subject at universities. We believe it is in the interest of many ...
Comments