skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124853acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI

Published:22 April 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

We discuss the legacy and processes of creative design, and differentiate it from the type of user-centered design commonly found in CHI. We provide an example of this process, and discuss how design practice constitutes an essential mode of inquiry. We argue the complementary nature of creative design and user-centered design practices. Syncretic disciplines shift and drift from their original practice. A key issue is how CHI is to respond to changes in acceptable design practice. A key contribution of this work is an illustrative example showing how designers can communicate their intellectual rigor to the CHI community.

References

  1. Biggs, M. A. R (2002). Introduction. In Proceedings of the Research into Practice Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Button, G. (2000). The ethnographic tradition and design. Design Studies. 21: 319--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Card, S., Moran, T., and Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Carroll, J.M. (1997). Rethinking minimalism. Minimalism beyond the Nurnberg Funnel. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, J.M., Kellogg, W.A., and Rosson, M.B. (1991). The task-artifact cycle. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Conklin, J. and Begeman, M.L. (1988). gIBIS: A hypertext tool for exploratory policy discussion. In Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Erickson, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M. and Wolf, T. Social translucence: Designing social infrastructures that make collective activity visible."" Communications of the ACM, 45(4). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fallman, D. (2003). Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of CHI 2003. ACM, pp. 225--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., Ostwald, J., Stahl, G., and Sumner, T. (1993). Embedding computer-based critics in the contexts of design. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of INTERCHI'93, pp. 157--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaver, W.W. (2000). Science vs. design. Plenary talk at DIS 2000, Brooklyn, New YorkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaver, W.W., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. (1999). Cultural probes. interactions, Jan + Feb, p. 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gedenryd, H. (1998). How designers work: Cognitive studies. PhD dissertation, Lund University. http://www.lucs.lu.se/People/ Henrik.Gedenryd/HowDesignersWork/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Good, M., Spine, T.M., Whiteside, J., and George, P. (1986). User-derived impact analysis as a tool for usability engineering. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of CHI'86. ACM, 241--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gould, J. and Boies, S. (1983). Human factors challenges in creating a principal support office system: The speech filing system approach. ACM TOIS, 1(4), pp. 273--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Johnsey, R. (1995). The design process -- Does it exist? A critical review of published models for the design process in England and Wales. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 5: 199--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Löwgren, J. (1995). Applying design methodology to software development. In Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems, DIS'95. ACM, pp. 87--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nelson, H.G., and Stolterman, E. (2003). The design way. Englewood Cliffs, Educational Technology Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rittel, H. and Webber, M.M. (1984). Planning problems are wicked problems. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology, pp. 135-144. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Schoen, D. (1983). From technical rationality to reflection-in-action. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Whiteside, J. and Wixon, D. (1987). Improving human-computer interaction: A quest for cognitive science. In J.M. Carroll (Ed.), Interfacing thought: Cognitive aspects of human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Wixon, D., Holtzblatt, K., and Knox, S. (1990). Contextual design: An emergent view of system design. In Human Factors in Computing Systems, the Proceedings of CHI'90. ACM, pp. 329--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wolf, C.G., Carroll, J.M., Landauer, T.K., John, B.E., and Whiteside, J. (1989). The role of laboratory experiments in HCI: Help.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dispelling "design" as the black art of CHI

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2006
      1353 pages
      ISBN:1595933727
      DOI:10.1145/1124772

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 April 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader