skip to main content
10.1145/1132516.1132524acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

A randomized polynomial-time simplex algorithm for linear programming

Published:21 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present the first randomized polynomial-time simplex algorithm for linear programming. Like the other known polynomial-time algorithms for linear programming, its running time depends polynomially on the number of bits used to represent its input.We begin by reducing the input linear program to a special form in which we merely need to certify boundedness. As boundedness does not depend upon the right-hand-side vector, we run the shadow-vertex simplex method with a random right-hand-side vector. Thus, we do not need to bound the diameter of the original polytope.Our analysis rests on a geometric statement of independent interest: given a polytope A x ≤ b in isotropic position, if one makes a polynomially small perturbation to b then the number of edges of the projection of the perturbed polytope onto a random 2-dimensional subspace is expected to be polynomial.

References

  1. D. Bertsimas and S. Vempala. Solving convex programs by random walks. J. ACM, 51(4):540--556, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. H. Borgwardt. The Simplex Method: a probabilistic analysis. Number 1 in Algorithms and Combinatorics. Springer-Verlag, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. B. Dantzig. Maximization of linear function of variables subject to linear inequalities. In T. C. Koopmans, editor, Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, pages 339--347. 1951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. G. B. Dantzig. Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, 1963.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. A. Deshpande and D. A. Spielman. Improved smoothed analysis of the shadow vertex simplex method. preliminary version appeared in FOCS '05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Dunagan and S. Vempala. A simple polynomial-time rescaling algorithm for solving linear programs. In Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC-04), pages 315--320, New York, June 13--15 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. K. Fukuda and T. Terlaky. Criss-cross methods: A fresh view on pivot algorithms. Mathematical Programming, 79:369--395, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. S. Gass and T. Saaty. The computational algorithm for the parametric objective function. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 2:39--45, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. Grotschel, L. Lovasz, and A. Schrijver. Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization. Springer-Verlag, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. G. Kalai and D. J. Kleitman. A quasi-polynomial bound for the diameter of graphs of polyhedra. Bulletin Amer. Math. Soc., 26:315--316, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. N. Karmarkar. A new polynomial time algorithm for linear programming. Combinatorica, 4:373--395, 1984. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. G. Khachiyan. A polynomial algorithm in linear programming. Doklady Akademia Nauk SSSR, pages 1093--1096, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. N. Megiddo and R. Chandrasekaran. On the epsilon-perturbation method for avoiding degeneracy. Operations Research Letters, 8:305--308, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. A. Schrijver. Theory of Linear and Integer Programming. John Wiley & Sons, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. A. Spielman and S.-H. Teng. Smoothed analysis of algorithms: Why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time. JACM: Journal of the ACM, 51:385 -- 463, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A randomized polynomial-time simplex algorithm for linear programming

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      STOC '06: Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
      May 2006
      786 pages
      ISBN:1595931341
      DOI:10.1145/1132516

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 May 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

      Upcoming Conference

      STOC '24
      56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
      June 24 - 28, 2024
      Vancouver , BC , Canada

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader