skip to main content
10.1145/1132516.1132603acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesstocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism

Published:21 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

It has been known for some time that graph isomorphism reduces to the hidden subgroup problem (HSP). What is more, most exponential speedups in quantum computation are obtained by solving instances of the HSP. A common feature of the resulting algorithms is the use of quantum coset states, which encode the hidden subgroup. An open question has been how hard it is to use these states to solve graph isomorphism. It was recently shown by Moore, Russell, and Schulman [30] that only an exponentially small amount of information is available from one, or a pair of coset states. A potential source of power to exploit are entangled quantum measurements that act jointly on many states at once. We show that entangled quantum measurements on at least Ω(n log n) coset states are necessary to get useful information for the case of graph isomorphism, matching an information theoretic upper bound. This may be viewed as a negative result because highly entangled measurements seem hard to implement in general. Our main theorem is very general and also rules out using joint measurements on few coset states for some other groups, such as GL(n,Fpm) and Gn where G is finite and satisfies a suitable property.

References

  1. D. Aharonov and A. Ta-Shma. Adiabatic quantum state generation and statistical zero knowledge. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of computing, pages 20--29, 2003. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0301023.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. G. Alagic, C. Moore, and A. Russell. Strong Fourier sampling fails over Gn. ArXiv preprint quant-ph/0511054, 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Bacon, A. Childs, and W. v. Dam. From optimal measurement to efficient quantum algorithms for the hidden subgroup problem over semidirect product groups. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2005. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0504083.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Beals. Quantum computation of Fourier transforms over the symmetric groups. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC'97), pages 48--53, El Paso, Texas, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Bennett, E. Bernstein, G. Brassard, and U. Vazirani. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing. SIAM J. Comput., 26(5):1510--1523, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y. G. Berkovich and E. M. Zhmud. Characters of finite groups, part 2, volume 181 of Translations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Brassard and P. Hoyer. An exact polynomial--time algorithm for Simon's problem. In Proceedings of Fifth Israeli Symposium on Theory of Computing and Systems, pages 12--33. ISTCS, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1997. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9704027.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Childs and P. Wocjan. On the quantum hardness of solving isomorphism problems as nonabelian hidden shift problems. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0510185, 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Ettinger and P. Hoyer. On quantum algorithms for noncommutative hidden subgroups. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 25(3):239--251, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. Ettinger, P. Hoyer, and E. Knill. A quantum observable for the graph isomorphism problem. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9901029, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Ettinger, P. Hoyer, and E. Knill. Hidden subgroup states are almost orthogonal. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9901034, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Friedl, G. Ivanyos, F. Magniez, M. Santha, and P. Sen. Hidden translation and orbit coset in quantum computing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 1--9, 2003. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0211091.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W. Fulton and J. Harris. Representation theory: A first course, volume 129 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 1991.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. P. X. Gallagher. Character values at involutions. Proceeedings of the American Mathematical Society, 120(3):657--659, 1994.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. Grigni, L. Schulman, M. Vazirani, and U. Vazirani. Quantum mechanical algorithms for the nonabelian hidden subgroup problem. Combinatorica, pages 137--154, 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Grover. A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 212--219, 1996. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9605043.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Hallgren. Polynomial-time quantum algorithms for Pell's equation and the principal ideal problem. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of computing, pages 653--658, 2002.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Hallgren. Fast quantum algorithms for computing the unit group and class group of a number field. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 468--474, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Hallgren, M. Rötteler, and P. Sen. Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0511148.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. Hallgren, A. Russell, and A. Ta-Shma. The hidden subgroup problem and quantum computation using group representations. SIAM Journal on Computing, 32(4):916--934, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. I. M. Isaacs. Character theory of finite groups. Academic Press, 1976.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Ivanyos, F. Magniez, and M. Santha. Efficient quantum algorithms for some instances of the non-abelian hidden subgroup problem. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, pages 723--740, 2003. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0102014.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. G. James and A. Kerber. The representation theory of the symmetric group. Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1981.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Y. Kitaev. Quantum measurements and the abelian stabilizer problem. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/9511026, 1995.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Köbler, U. Schöning, and J. Torán. The graph isomorphism problem. Birkhäuser, 1993.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. G. Kuperberg. A subexponential-time quantum algorithm for the dihedral hidden subgroup problem. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0302112, 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. D. Lafferty and D. Rockmore. Fast Fourier analysis for rm SL2 over a finite field and related numerical experiments. Experimental Mathematics, 1(2):115--139, 1992.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. C. Moore, D. Rockmore, A. Russell, and L. Schulman. The power of basis selection in fourier sampling: Hidden subgroup problems in affine groups. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 1113--1122, 2004. Journal version in preparation. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0503095.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. C. Moore and A. Russell. The symmetric group defies strong Fourier sampling: Part II. ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0501066, 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. C. Moore, A. Russell, and L. Schulman. The symmetric group defies strong Fourier sampling. In Proceedings of the 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pages 479--488, 2005. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0501056.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. M. Mosca and A. Ekert. The hidden subgroup problem and eigenvalue estimation on a quantum computer. In Quantum Computing and Quantum Communications, volume 1509 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 174--188. Springer-Verlag, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. M. Nielsen and I. Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, 2000.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. J. Radhakrishnan, M. Rötteler, and P. Sen. On the power of random bases in Fourier sampling: Hidden subgroup problem in the Heisenberg group. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3580, pages 1399--1411. Springer-Verlag, 2005. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0503114.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Y. Roichman. Upper bound on the characters of the symmetric groups. Inventiones Mathematicae, 125:451--485, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. A. Schmidt and U. Vollmer. Polynomial time quantum algorithm for the computation of the unit group of a number field. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 475--480, 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. P. Sen. Random measurement bases, quantum state distinction and applications to the hidden subgroup problem. In Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, 2006. To appear. Also: ArXiv preprint quant--ph/0512085.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. P. Serre. Linear representations of finite groups. Springer, 1977.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. P. Shor. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5):1484--1509, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. D. R. Simon. On the power of quantum computation. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 116--123, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994. Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Computer Society Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Limitations of quantum coset states for graph isomorphism

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        STOC '06: Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing
        May 2006
        786 pages
        ISBN:1595931341
        DOI:10.1145/1132516

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 May 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,469of4,586submissions,32%

        Upcoming Conference

        STOC '24
        56th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2024)
        June 24 - 28, 2024
        Vancouver , BC , Canada

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader