skip to main content
10.1145/1132905.1132921acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobihocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Deploying wireless sensors to achieve both coverage and connectivity

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

It is well-known that placing disks in the triangular lattice pattern is optimal for achieving full coverage on a plane. With the emergence of wireless sensor networks, however, it is now no longer enough to consider coverage alone when deploying a wireless sensor network; connectivity must also be con-sidered. While moderate loss in coverage can be tolerated by applications of wireless sensor networks, loss in connectivity can be fatal. Moreover, since sensors are subject to unanticipated failures after deployment, it is not enough to have a wireless sensor network just connected, it should be k-connected (for k > 1 ). In this paper, we propose an optimal deployment pattern to achieve both full coverage and 2-connectivity, and prove its optimality for all values of rc/rs, where rc is the communication radius, and rs is the sensing radius. We also prove the optimality of a previously proposed deployment pattern for achieving both full coverage and 1-connectivity, when rc/rs < √3 .Finally, we compare the efficiency of some popular regular deployment patterns such as the square grid and triangular lattice, in terms of the number of sensors needed to provide coverage and connectivity.

References

  1. A. Arora and et. al. ExScal: Elements of an Extreme Scale Wireless Sensor Network. In 11th IEEE International Conference on Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications (IEEE RTCSA), Hong Kong, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S. Bapat, V. Kulathumani, and A. Arora. Analyzing the Yield of ExScal, a Large Scale Wireless Sensor Network Experiment. In 13th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), Boston, MA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Q. Cao, T. Yan, J.A. Stankovic,and T. F. Abdelzaher. Analysis of Target Detection Performance for Wireless Sensor Networks. In International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Networks (DCOSS), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. S. Hillier and G. J. Lieberman. Introduction to Operations Research. McGraw-Hill, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Iyengar, K. Kar and S. Banerjee. Low-coordination Topologies for Redundancy in Sensor Networks. In the Sixth ACM Annual International Symposium on Mobile Ad-Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc), pages 332--342, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Kershner. The Number of Circles Covering a Set. American Journal of Mathematics, 61:665--671, 1939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y.-C. Wang, C.-C. Hu, and Y.-C. Tseng. Efficient Deployment Algorithms for Ensuring Coverage and Connectivity of Wireless Sensor Networks. In Wireless International Conference (WICON), Budapest, Hungary, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Xing, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, C. Lu, R. Pless, and C. Gill. Integrated Coverage and Connectivity Configuration in Wireless Sensor Networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 1(1):36--72, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Zhang and J. Hou. Maintaining Sensing Coverage and Connectivity in Large Sensor Networks. In NSF International Workshop on Theoretical and Algorithmic Aspects of Sensor, Ad Hoc Wirelsss, and Peer-to-Peer Networks, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Zhao and R. Govindan. Understanding Packet Delivery Performance in Dense Wireless Sensor Networks. In ACM Conference on Ebmedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), pages 1--13, Los Angeles, CA, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. G.Zhou, T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, and J. A. Stankovic. Impact of Radio Irregularity on Wireless Sensor Networks. In ACM MobiSys, pages 125--138, Boston, MA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Deploying wireless sensors to achieve both coverage and connectivity

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiHoc '06: Proceedings of the 7th ACM international symposium on Mobile ad hoc networking and computing
      May 2006
      378 pages
      ISBN:1595933689
      DOI:10.1145/1132905

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 May 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate296of1,843submissions,16%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader