skip to main content
10.1145/1135777.1135802acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswwwConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Off the beaten tracks: exploring three aspects of web navigation

Published:23 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents results of a long-term client-side Web usage study, updating previous studies that range in age from five to ten years. We focus on three aspects of Web navigation: changes in the distribution of navigation actions, speed of navigation and within-page navigation."Navigation actionsö corresponding to users' individual page requests are discussed by type. We reconfirm links to be the most important navigation element, while backtracking has lost more than half of its previously reported share and form submission has become far more common. Changes of the Web and the browser interfaces are candidates for causing these changes.Analyzing the time users stayed on pages, we confirm Web navigation to be a rapidly interactive activity. A breakdown of page characteristics shows that users often do not take the time to read the available text or consider all links. The performance of the Web is analyzed and reassessed against the resulting requirements.Finally, habits of within-page navigation are presented. Although most selected hyperlinks are located in the top left corner of the = screen, in nearly a quarter of all cases people choose links that require scrolling. We analyzed the available browser real estate to gain insights for the design of non-scrolling Web pages.

References

  1. Abrams, D., Baecker, R., Chignell, M.: Information Archiving with Bookmarks: Personal Web Space Construction and Organization. Proc. CHI'98, 1998, pp. 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Barrett, R., Maglio, P.P., Kellem, D.C.: How to Personalize the Web. Proc. of CHI '97, Atlanta, GA., 1997 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Catledge, L.D., Pitkow, J.E.: Characterizing browsing strategies in the World-Wide Web. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, (27)6, 1995, pp. 1065--1073. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chisholm, W. et al.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, World Wide Web Consortium, 1999. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Choo, C.W., Detlor, B., Turnbull, D.: Information Seeking on the Web: An Integrated Model of Browsing and Searching, First Monday Online Journal, (5)2, Feb. 2000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B., JasonSmith, M.: Pushing Back: Evaluating a New Behavior for the Back and Forward Buttons in Web Browsers. Int. J. of Human-Computer Studies. 57(5), 2002, pp. 397--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cockburn, A., McKenzie, B.: What Do Web Users Do? An Empirical Analysis of Web Use. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54(6), 2001, pp. 903--922. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cole, J.I. et al.: The UCLA Internet Report - öSurveying the Digital Futureö. Los Angeles, UCLA Center for Communication Policy, 2003 www.forbes.com/fdc/mediaresourcecenter/UCLA03.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. comScore Media Metrix: Surfing Down Memory Lane to January 1996: comScore Media Metrix Revisits First-Ever Web Site Rankings. February 25, 2004. http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=434Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Conklin, J.: Hypertext: An Introduction and Survey. IEEE Computer 20(9), 1987, pp. 17--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Cunha, C.R., Bestavros, A., Crovella, M.E.: Characteristics of WWW Client-based Traces, Tech. Rep. BU-CS-95-010, CS Dept, Boston University, 1995. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/cunha95characteristics.html Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Greenberg, S., Cockburn, A.: Getting Back to Back: Alternate Behaviors for a Web Browser's Back Button. 5th Human Factors and the Web Conference, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Halasz, F. G.: Reflections on Notecards: Seven Issues for the Next Generation of Hypertext Systems. Communications of the ACM, 31(7), 1988, pp. 836--852. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harris Interactive: More Than Four in Ten Internet Users Now Have Broadband. Poll #63, 8.9., 2004. www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=492Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoffman, M.: Enabling Extremely Rapid Navigation in Your Web or Document, 2nd Version, December 1997. http://www.hypertextnavigation.com/infoaxcs.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Horton, W.: Designing and Writing Online Documentation: Help Files to Hypertext. (NY) John Wiley & Sons, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hyams, J., Sellen, A.: Gathering and Sharing Web-Based Information: Implications for "ePerson" concepts. HP Labs: Tech. Report: HPL-2003-19, Feb. 2003, 42 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., Saracevic, T.: Real life, Real Users and Real Needs: A Study and Analysis of User Queries on the Web. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 2000, pp. 207--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jansen, B. J., Pooch, U. W.: A Review of Web Searching Studies and a Framework for Future Research. J. American Society of Information Science, 52(3), 2000, pp. 235--246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jones, W., Bruce, H., Dumais, S.: Keeping found things found on the Web. 10th Int. Conf. Information and Knowledge Management (ACM CIKM), 2001, pp. 119--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kaasten, S., Greenberg, S.: Integrating Back, History and Bookmarks in Web Browsers. Ext. Abstracts CHI'01, 2001, pp. 379--380. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kehoe, C., Pitkow, J., Sutton, K., Aggarwal, G., Rogers, J.: 10th GVU WWW User Survey, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. http:// www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-1998-10 LinkQuality.com: The Web's Integrity Benchmark, Linkalarm Inc., 2005. http://linkquality.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Lynch, P. J., Horton S.: Web Style Guide: Basic Design Principles for Creating Web Sites. (Yale), Yale University Press, 2002. http://www.webstyleguide.com/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Milic-Frailing, N., Jones, R., Rodder, K., Smyth, G., Blackwell, A., Sommerer, R.: Smartback: Supporting Users in Back Navigation. 13th Int. Conf. on World Wide Web, NY, 2004, pp. 63--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Morkes, J., Nielsen, J.: Concise, SCANNABLE, and Objective: How to Write for the Web, Sun Microsystems. 1997. http://www.useit.com/papers/webwriting/writing.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Moyle, M., Cockburn, A.: The Design and Evaluation of a Flick Gesture for 'Back' and 'Forward' in Web Browsers. 4th Australasian User Interface Conf., 2003, pp. 39--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Nielsen, J.: Scrolling and Scrollbars. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group, Freemont, USA, August 2005. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050711.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Nielsen, J.: The Need for Web Design Standards. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group, Freemont, USA, Sept. 2004. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20040913.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Nielsen, J.: The Tyranny of the Page: Continued Lack of Decent Navigation Support in Version 4 Browsers. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group, Freemont, USA, Nov. 1997. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9711a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nielsen, J: Ten Best Intranets of 2005. Useit Alertbox, Nielsen Norman Group, Freemont, USA, February 2005. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20050228.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Obendorf, H., Weinreich, H., Hass, T.: Automatic Support for Web User Studies with SCONE and TEA. Ext. Abstracts of CHI '04, (Vienna), 2004, pp. 1135--1138. http://www.scone.de/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ottaway, M.: Nielsen//Netratings Data Support TVNZ's Widescreen Web Decision. Nielsen/Netratings, May 2004. http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040504_nz.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Peterson, E.: Which screen resolution should you be using? Jupiterresearch Analyst Weblogs, 2004. http://weblogs.jupiterresearch.com/analysts/peterson/archives/003965.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Pitkow, J.E.: Summary of WWW Characterizations. The Web Journal 2(1), 1998, pp. 3--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Rajamony, R., Elnozahy, M.: Measuring Client-Perceived Response Times on the WWW, 3rd USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and System, (SF), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Robertson, G., McCracken, D.L., Nevell, A.: The ZOG Approach to Man-Machine Communication. Carnegie Mellon Univ., CS Dept., Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-79-148, 1979Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Sellen, A.J., Murphy, R. M., & Shaw, K.: How Knowledge Workers Use the Web. Proc. of CHI 2002, Minneapolis, ACM Press, 2002, pp. 227--234. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. AW, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Spiliopoulou, M., Mobasher, B., Berendt, B., Nakagawa, M.: A Framework for the Evaluation of Session Reconstruction Heuristics in Web Usage Analysis. INFORMS Journal of Computing, 15(2), 2003, pp. 171--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Spool, J., et al.: Web Site Usability: A Designer's Guide. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, (San Francisco, CA), 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Tauscher, L., Greenberg, S.: How People Revisit Web Pages: Empirical Findings and Implications for the Design of History Systems. Int. J. of Human Computer Studies, 47(1), 1997, pp. 97--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. The Counter: Global Screen Resolution Statistics. Jupitermedia Corporation, 2005. http://www.thecounter.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinreich, H., Lamersdorf, W.: Eine Umfrage zu Link- und Objekt-Attributen im Web. Proc. Mensch und Computer 2003. Teubner Verlag, 2003, pp. 387--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, E.: Data Cleaning Methods for Client and Proxy Logs. WWW 2006 Workshop Proc.: Logging Traces of Web Activity, 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Off the beaten tracks: exploring three aspects of web navigation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        WWW '06: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web
        May 2006
        1102 pages
        ISBN:1595933239
        DOI:10.1145/1135777

        Copyright © 2006 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 May 2006

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,899of8,196submissions,23%

        Upcoming Conference

        WWW '24
        The ACM Web Conference 2024
        May 13 - 17, 2024
        Singapore , Singapore

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader