skip to main content
10.1145/1142473.1142492acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Constraint chaining: on energy-efficient continuous monitoring in sensor networks

Published:27 June 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Wireless sensor networks have created new opportunities for data collection in a variety of scenarios, such as environmental and industrial, where we expect data to be temporally and spatially correlated. Researchers may want to continuously collect all sensor data from the network for later analysis. Suppression, both temporal and spatial, provides opportunities for reducing the energy cost of sensor data collection. We demonstrate how both types can be combined for maximal benefit. We frame the problem as one of monitoring node and edge constraints. A monitored node triggers a report if its value changes. A monitored edge triggers a report if the difference between its nodes' values changes. The set of reports collected at the base station is used to derive all node values. We fully exploit the potential of this global inference in our algorithm, CONCH, short for constraint chaining. Constraint chaining builds a network of constraints that are maintained locally, but allow a global view of values to be maintained with minimal cost. Network failure complicates the use of suppression, since either causes an absence of reports. We add enhancements to CONCH to build in redundant constraints and provide a method to interpret the resulting reports in case of uncertainty. Using simulation we experimentally evaluate CONCH's effectiveness against competing schemes in a number of interesting scenarios.

References

  1. K. Chintalapudi and R. Govindan. Localized edge detection in sensor fields. In Proc. of the 2003 IEEE Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. Chu, A. Deshpande, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Approximate data collection in sensor networks using probabilistic models. In Proc. of the 2006 Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, Apr. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chuck Conner. Modeling Heat Transfer in Parallel. http://www.cas.usf.edu/~cconnor/parallel/2dheat/2dheat.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. Cormen, C. Leiserson, R. Rivest, and C. Stein. Introduction to Algorithms, chapter 23. McGraw-Hill/MIT Press, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Crossbow Inc. MPR-Mote Processor Radio Board User's Manual.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Deligiannakis, Y. Kotidis, and N. Roussopoulos. Compressing historical information in sensor networks. In Proc. of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD Intl. Conf. on Management of Data, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, D. Estrin, J. Heidemann, and F. Silva. Directed diffusion for wireless sensor ACM/IEEE Trans. on Networking, 11(1):2--16, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Jain, E. Chang, and Y. Wang. Adaptive stream resource management using kalman Filters. In Proc. of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD Intl. Conf. on Management of Data, June 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Y. Kotidis. Snapshot queries: Towards data-centric sensor networks. In Proc. of the 2005 Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, Apr. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. Tag: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proc. of the 2002 USENIX Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Dec. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. Manjhi, S. Nath, and P. Gibbons. Tributaries and deltas: Efficient and robust aggregation in sensor network streams. In Proc. of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD Intl. Conf. on Management of Data, June 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. X. Meng, L. Li, T. Nandagopal, and S. Lu. Event contour: An efficient and robust mechanism for tasks in sensor networks. Technical report, UCLA, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Pattem, B. Krishnamachari, and R. Govindan. The impact of spatial correlation on routing with compression in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of the 2004 Intl. Conf. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Apr. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. Petrovic, R. Shah, K. Ramchandran, and J. Rabaey. Data funneling: Routing with aggregation and compression for wireless sensor networks. In Proc. of the 2003 IEEE Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. G. Pottie and W. Kaiser. Wireless integrated network sensors. Communications of the ACM, 43(5):51--58, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Sharaf, J. Beaver, A. Labrinidis, and P. Chryanthis. Tina: A scheme for temporal coherency-aware in-network aggregation. In Proc. of the 2003 ACM Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access, Sept. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. I. Solis and K. Obraczka. Efficient continuous mapping in sensor networks using isolines. In Proc. of the 2005 Mobiquitous, July 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Woo, T. Tong, and D. Culler. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proc. of the 2003 ACM Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Nov. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Y. Yao and J. Gehrke. The cougar approach to in-network query processing in sensor networks. ACM SIGMOD Record, 31(3), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Z. Zhou, S. Das, and H. Gupta. Connected k-coverage problem in sensor networks. In Proc. of the 2004 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Computer Communications and Networks, Oct. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Constraint chaining: on energy-efficient continuous monitoring in sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMOD '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
      June 2006
      830 pages
      ISBN:1595934340
      DOI:10.1145/1142473

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 June 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader