skip to main content
10.1145/1142473.1142493acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Energy-efficient monitoring of extreme values in sensor networks

Published:27 June 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Monitoring extreme values (MAX or MIN) is a fundamental problem in wireless sensor networks (and in general, complex dynamic systems). This problem presents very different algorithmic challenges from aggregate and selection queries, in the sense that an individual node cannot by itself determine its inclusion in the query result. We present novel query processing algorithms for this problem, with the goal of minimizing message traffic in the network. These algorithms employ a hierarchy of local constraints, or thresholds, to leverage network topology such that message-passing is localized. We evaluate all algorithms using simulated and real-world data to study various trade-offs.

References

  1. B. Babcock, M. Datar, R. Motwani, and L. O'Callaghan. Maintaining Variance and k-Medians over Data Stream Windows. In Proc. of the 2003 ACM Symp. on Principles of Database Systems, San Diego, California, USA, June 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Cheng, B. Kao, S. Prabhakar, A. Kwan, and Y. Tu. Adaptive Stream Filters for Entity-based Queries with Non-Value Tolerance. In Proc. of the 2005 Intl. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Trondheim, Norway, Aug. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chuck Conner. Modeling Heat Transfer in Parallel. http://www.cas.usf.edu/~cconnor/parallel/2dheat/2dheat.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Considine, F. Li, G. Kollios, and J. Byers. Approximate Aggregation Techniques for Sensor Databases. In Proc. of the 2004 Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Mar. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Crossbow Inc. MPR-Mote Processor Radio Board User's Manual.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Deligannakis, Y. Kotidis, and N. Roussopoulos. Hierarchical In-Network Data Aggregation with Quality Guarantees. In Proc. of the 2004 Intl. Conf. on Extending Database Technology, Heraklion, Crete, Mar. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Intel Berkeley Research Lab. http://berkeley.intel-research.net/labdata/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Z. Liu, K. Sia, and J. Cho. Cost-Efficient Processing of Min/Max Queries over Distributed Sensors with Uncertainty. In Proc. of the 2004 ACM Symp. on Applied Computing, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Mar. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Madden, M. Franklin, J. Hellerstein, and W. Hong. TAG: a Tiny AGgregation Service for Ad-Hoc Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 2002 USENIX Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, Dec. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Madden, R. Szewczyk, M. Franklin, and D. Culler. Supporting Aggregate Queries Over Ad-Hoc Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 2002 IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Callicoon, New York, USA, June 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. Olston, B. Loo, and J. Widom. Adaptive Precision Setting for Cached Approximate Values. In Proc. of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD Intl. Conf. on Management of Data, Santa Barbara, California, USA, May 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Pattem, B. Krishnamachari, and R. Govindan. The Impact of Spatial Correlation on Routing with Compression in Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 2004 Intl. Conf. on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Berkeley, California, USA, Apr. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Petrovic, R. Shah, K. Ramchandran, and J. Rabaey. Data Funneling: Routing with Aggregation and Compression for Wireless Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 2003 IEEE Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, May 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. N. Shrivastava, C. Buragohain, D. Agrawal, and S. Suri. Medians and Beyond: New Aggregation Techniques for Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 2004 ACM Conf. on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, Nov. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Silberstein, R. Braynard, C. Ellis, K. Munagala, and J. Yang. A Sampling-Based Approach to Optimizing Top-k Queries in Sensor Networks. In Proc. of the 2006 Intl. Conf. on Data Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Apr. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Energy-efficient monitoring of extreme values in sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGMOD '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
      June 2006
      830 pages
      ISBN:1595934340
      DOI:10.1145/1142473

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 27 June 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader