skip to main content
10.1145/1161089.1161095acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

On accurate measurement of link quality in multi-hop wireless mesh networks

Published:29 September 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a highly efficient and accurate link-quality measurement framework, called EAR (Efficient and Accurate link-quality monitoR), for multi-hop wireless mesh networks, that has several salient features. First, it exploits three complementary measurement schemes: passive, cooperative, and active monitoring. EAR maximizes the measurement accuracy by (i) dynamically and adaptively adopting one of these schemes and (ii) opportunistically exploiting the nicast application traffic present in the network, while minimizing the measurement overhead. Second, EAR effectively identifies the existence of wireless link asymmetry by measuring the quality of each link in both directions of the link, thus improving the utilization of network capacity by up to 114%. Finally, its reliance on both the network layer and the IEEE 802.11-based device driver solutions makes EAR easily deployable in existing multi-hop wireless mesh networks without system recompilation or MAC firmware modification. EAR has been evaluated extensively via both ns-2-based simulation and experimentation on our Linux-based implementation. Both simulation and experimentation results have shown EAR to provide highly accurate link-quality measurements with minimum overhead.

References

  1. Linux-WLAN project. http://www.linux-wlan.com/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mesh dynamics inc. http://www.meshdynamics.com.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mesh networking summit. http://research.microsoft.com/meshsummit.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. MIT roofnet. http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/roofnet.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Multiband atheros driver for wifi. http://madwifi.org/.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Netfilter. http://www.netfilter.org.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. ns-2 network simulator. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Seattle wireless. http://www.seattlewireless.net.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. IEEE 802.11, wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications. Standard, IEEE, Aug. 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, S. Biswas, G. Judd, and R. Morris. Link-level measurements from an 802.11b mesh network. In Proceedings of ACM SigComm, Portland, OR, Aug. 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Alicherry, R. Bhatia, and L. Li. Joint channel assignment and routing for throughput optimization in multi-radio wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, Cologne, Germany, Aug. 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. P. Bahl, R. Chandra, and J. Dunagan. SSCH: Slotted seeded channel hopping for capacity improvement in IEEE 802.11 ad-hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Biswas and R. Morris. Opportunistic routing in multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-II), Cambridge, MA, Nov. 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Biswas and R. Morris. ExOR: Opprotunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM SigComm, Philadelphia, PA, Aug. 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Chen and K. Nahrstedt. Distributed quality-of-service routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE JSAC, 17(8):1488--1505, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. D. Clark, C. Partridge, J. C. Ramming, and J. T. Wroclawski. A knowledge plane for the internet. In Proceedings of ACM SigComm, Karlsruhe, Germany, Aug. 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. D. S. D. Couto, D. Aguayo, J. Bicket, and R. Morris. A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, San Diego, CA, Sept. 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. S. D. Couto, D. Aguayo, B. A. Chambers, and R. Morris. Performance of multi-hop wireless networks: Shortest path is not enough. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets-I), Princeton, New Jersey, Oct. 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Dovrolis, P. Ramanathan, and D. Moore. What do packet dispersion techniques measure? In Proceedings of IEEE InfoCom, Anchorage, AK, Apr. 2001.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. B. Downey. Using pathchar to estimate Internet link characteristics. In Proceedings of ACM SigComm, Cambridge, MA, Sept. 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. Draves, J. Padhye, and B. Zill. Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, Philadelphia, PA, Sept. 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. T. Goff, N. B. Abu-Ghazaleh, D. S. Phatak, and R. Kahvecioglu. Preemptive routing in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, pages 43--52, 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. S. Haykin. Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE JSAC, 23(2), Feb. 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. C. Hedrick. Routing information protocol. Internet Request for Comments 1058 (rfc1058.txt), June 1988.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. C. Ho, K. Ramachandran, K. Almeroth, and E. Belding-Royer. A scalable framework for wireless network monitoring. In Proceedings of ACM WMASH, Philadelphia, PA, Oct. 2004.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. A. Jain, D. Qiao, and K. G. Shin. RT-WLAN: A soft real-time extension to the orinoco linux device driver. In Proceedings of IEEE PIMRC, Beijing, China, Sept. 2003.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. B. Johnson and D. A. Maltz. Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In the Book of Mobile Computing, volume 353. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. M. Kodialam and T. Nandagopal. Characterizing the capacity region in multi-radio multi-channel wireless mesh networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, Cologne, Germany, Aug. 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. D. Kotz, C. Newport, R. S. Gray, J. Liu, Y. Yuan, and C. Elliott. Experimental evaluation of wireless simulation assumptions. Technical Report TR2004-507, Dept. of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, June 2004.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. S. Lee, B. Bhattacharjee, and S. Banerjee. Efficient geographic routing in multihop wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc, Urbana-Champaign, IL, May 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. B. M. Maggs. Asymmetric wireless networks. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/ bmm/wireless.html.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Moy. OSPF version 2. Internet Request for Comments 2328 (rfc2328.txt), Apr. 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. Internet Request for Comments 3561 (rfc3561.txt), July 2003.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. C. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In ACM SigComm, pages 234--244, London, UK, Sept. 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. L. Qiu, P. Bahl, A. Rao, and L. Zhou. Troubleshooting multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM SigMetrics (extended abstract), Alberta, Canada, June 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. A. Raniwala and T. Chiueh. Architecture and algorithms for an IEEE 802.11-based multi-channel wireless mesh network. In Proceedings of IEEE InfoCom, Miami, FL, Mar. 2005.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. S. Seshan, M. Stemm, and R. Katz. SPAND: Shared passive network performance discovery. In Proceedings of USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, Monterey, CA, Dec. 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. R. Sivakumar, P. Sinha, and V. Bharghavan. CEDAR: Core extraction distributed ad hoc routing. IEEE JSAC, 17(8):1454--65, 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. C. Williamson. Internet traffic measurement. IEEE Internet Computing, 05(6):70--74, Nov. 2001.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. C. Yu, K. G. Shin, and L. Song. Link-layer salvaging for making routing progress in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc, Urbana-Champaign, IL, May 2005.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. On accurate measurement of link quality in multi-hop wireless mesh networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiCom '06: Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
      September 2006
      428 pages
      ISBN:1595932860
      DOI:10.1145/1161089

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 September 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader