skip to main content
10.1145/1161089.1161123acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Routing algorithms for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications in underwater sensor networks

Published:29 September 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

Underwater sensor networks consist of sensors and vehicles deployed to perform collaborative monitoring tasks over a given region. Underwater sensor networks will find applications in oceano-graphic data collection, pollution monitoring, offshore exploration, disaster prevention, assisted navigation, tactical surveillance, and mine reconnaissance. Underwater acoustic networking is the enabling technology for these applications. In this paper, an architecture for three-dimensional underwater sensor networks is considered, and a model characterizing the acoustic channel utilization efficiency is introduced, which allows investigating some fundamental characteristics of the underwater environment. In particular, the model allows setting the optimal packet size for underwater communications given monitored volume, density of the sensor network, and application requirements. Moreover, the problem of data gathering is investigated at the network layer by considering the cross-layer interactions between the routing functions and the characteristics of the underwater acoustic channel. Two distributed routing algorithms are introduced for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications. The proposed solutions allow each node to select its next hop, with the objective of minimizing the energy consumption taking the varying condition of the underwater channel and the different application requirements into account. The proposed routing solutions are shown to achieve the performance targets by means of simulation.

References

  1. The J-Sim Simulator, http://www.j-sim.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. M. Abolhasan, T. Wysocki, and E. Dutkiewicz. A Review of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Ad Hoc Networks (Elsevier), 2:1--22, Jan. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. K. Akkaya and M. Younis. A Survey on Routing Protocols for Wireless Sensor Networks. Ad Hoc Networks (Elsevier), 3 3):325--349, May 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia. Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks: Research Challenges. Ad Hoc Networks (Elsevier), 3(3):257--279, May 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G. Bianchi. Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 DCF. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 18(3):535--547, Mar. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. Bose, P. Morin, I. Stojmenovic, and J. Urrutia. Routing with Guaranteed Delivery in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks. ACM Wireless Networks, 7(6):609--616, Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Codiga, J. Rice, and P. Baxley. Networked Acoustic Modems for Real-Time Data Delivery from Distributed Subsurface Instruments in the Coastal Ocean: Initial System Development and Performance. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 21(2):331--346, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. F. Fisher and V. Simmons. Sound Absorption in Sea Water. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 62(3):558--564, Sept. 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. S. A. Glegg, R. Pirie, and A. LaVigne. A Study of Ambient Noise in Shallow Water. In Florida Atlantic University Technical Report, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Jacquet, P. Muhlethaler, T. Clausen, A. Laouiti, A. Qayyum, and L. Viennot. Optimized Link State Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Networks. In Proc. of IEEE INMIC, pages 62--68, Pakistan, Dec. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. D. B. Johnson, D. A. Maltz, and J. Broch. DSR: The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Networks. In C. E. Perkins, editor, Ad Hoc Networking, pages 139--172. Addison-Wesley, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. R. Jurdak, C. Lopes, and P. Baldi. Battery Lifetime Estimation and Optimization for Underwater Sensor Networks. IEEE Sensor Network Operations, Winter 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. B. Karp and H. Kung. GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks. In Proc. of ACM/IEEE MOBICOM, pages 243--254, Boston, MA, USA, Aug. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. Melodia, D. Pompili, and I. F. Akyildiz. On the interdependence of Distributed Topology Control and Geographical Routing in Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks. Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 23(3):520--532, Mar. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. L. Miller. Distribution of Link Distances in a Wireless Network. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 106(2):401--412, Mar./Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. D. Moore, J. Leonard, D. Rus, and S. Teller. Robust Distributed Network Localization with Noisy Range Measurements. In Proc. of ACM SenSys, Baltimore, MD, USA, Nov. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing. IETF RFC 3561. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Perkins and P. Bhagwat. Highly Dynamic Destination Sequenced Distance Vector Routing (DSDV) for Mobile Computers. In Proc. of ACM SIGCOMM, London, UK, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. Pompili, T. Melodia, and I. F. Akyildiz. A Resilient Routing Algorithm for Long-term applications in Underwater Sensor Networks. In Proc. of MedHocNet, Lipari, Italy, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Proakis. Digital Communications. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Proakis, E. Sozer, J. Rice, and M. Stojanovic. Shallow Water Acoustic Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, pages 114--119, Nov. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. V. Ravelomanana. Extremal Properties of Three-dimensional Sensor Networks with Applications. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(3):246--257, July/Sept. 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. E. Sozer, M. Stojanovic, and J. Proakis. Underwater Acoustic Networks. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 25(1):72--83, Jan. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. Stojanovic. Acoustic (underwater) Communications. In J. G. Proakis, editor, Encyclopedia of Telecommunications. John Wiley and Sons, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Stojanovic. Optimization of a Data Link Protocol for an Underwater Acoustic Channel. In Proc. IEEE OCEANS,Brest, France, June 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. I. Stojmenovic. Localized Network Layer Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Optimizing Cost over Progress Ratio. IEEE Networks, 20(1):21--27, Jan./Feb. 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. R. J. Urick. Principles of Underwater Sound. McGraw-Hill, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. I. Vasilescu, K. Kotay, D. Rus, M. Dunbabin, and P. Corke. Data Collection, Storage, and Retrieval with an Underwater Sensor Network. In Proc. of ACM SenSys, San Diego, CA, USA, Nov. 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. G. Xie and J. Gibson. A Network Layer Protocol for UANs to Address Propagation Delay Induced Performance Limitations. In Proc. of IEEE OCEANS, volume 4, pages 2087--2094, Honolulu, HI, Nov. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. P. Xie, J.-H. Cui, and L. Lao. VBF: Vector-Based Forwarding Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks. In Networking, pages 1216--1221, Coimbra, Portugal, May 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Routing algorithms for delay-insensitive and delay-sensitive applications in underwater sensor networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiCom '06: Proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
      September 2006
      428 pages
      ISBN:1595932860
      DOI:10.1145/1161089

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 29 September 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader