skip to main content
10.1145/1168149.1168158acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies

Published:23 May 2006Publication History

ABSTRACT

After an historical review of evaluation methods, we describe an emerging research method called Multi-dimensional In-depth Long-term Case studies (MILCs) which seems well adapted to study the creative activities that users of information visualization systems engage in. We propose that the efficacy of tools can be assessed by documenting 1) usage (observations, interviews, surveys, logging etc.) and 2) expert users' success in achieving their professional goals. We summarize lessons from related ethnography methods used in HCI and provide guidelines for conducting MILCs for information visualization. We suggest ways to refine the methods for MILCs in modest sized projects and then envision ambitious projects with 3-10 researchers working over 1-3 years to understand individual and organizational use of information visualization by domain experts working at the frontiers of knowledge in their fields.

References

  1. Amabile, T. M., Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO, Westview Press (1996).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., and Smith, D. M., Action Science. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1985).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentley, R., Hughes, J., Randall, D., Rodden, T., Sawyer, P., Shapiro, D., and Sommerville, I., Ethnographically-informed systems design for air traffic control, Proc. CSCW '92, ACM Press, New York (1992), 123--129.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K., Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CA (1998).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bodker, S., Scenarios in user-centered design --- setting the stage for reflection and action, Interacting with Computers 13, 1 (2000), 61--76.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Candy, L. & Edmonds, E. A., Supporting the creative user: A criteria based approach to interaction design. Design Studies 18 (1997), 185--194.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Candy, L. and Edmonds, E. A., Explorations in Art and Technology, Springer-Verlag, London (2002).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dumas, J. and Redish, J., A Practical Guide to Usability Testing: Revised Ed., Intellect Books, Bristol, UK (1999).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Edmonds, E. A., Weakley, A. J., Candy, L., Fell, M. J., Knott, R. P. and Pauletto, S., The studio as laboratory: combining creative practice and digital technology research, Int'l Journal of Human Computer Studies 63, 4--5 (2005), Special Issue on Computer Support for Creativity, 452--481.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Erickson, T., The design and long-term use of a personal electronic notebook: A reflective analysis, Proc. ACM CHI 96 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference, ACM Press, New York (1996), 11--18.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Fekete, J.-D., Grinstein, G., Plaisant, C., IEEE Info Vis 2004 Contest, the history of Info Vis, www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/iv04contest (2004)]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fetterman, D. M., Ethnography: Step by Step: 2nd Edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1998).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Fjermestad, J. and Hiltz S. R. "Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies," Journal of Management Information Systems 17, 3 (2000), 113--157.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Harper, R., The organization of ethnography, Proc. CSCW 2000, ACM Press, New York (2000), 239--264.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hewett, T. T., The role of iterative evaluation in designing systems for usability, In M. D. Harrison and A. F. Monk (Eds.), People and Computers: Designing for Usability Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1986), 196--214.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hewett, T. T., Informing the design of computer based creativity support environments. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 63, 4--5 (2005), Special Issue on Computer Support for Creativity, 383--409.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hughes, J., King, V., Rodden, T., and Andersen, H., The role of ethnography in interactive systems design, ACM interactions 2, 2 (April 1995), 56--65.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Hughes, J., O'Brien, J., Rodden, T., and Rouncefield, M., Design with ethnography: A presentation framework for design, Proc. of Design of Interaction Systems '97, ACM Press, New York (1997), 147--159.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lewin, K. Field Theory in Social Science. Basic Books, New York (1951).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Marchionini, G. and Crane, G. Evaluating Hypermedia and Learning: Methods and Results from the Perseus Project, ACM Trans. on Information Systems 12, 1 (1994), 5--34.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Millen, David, Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field, Proc. ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM Press, New York (2000), 280--286.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Olson, G. and Olson, J., Groupware and computer supported cooperative work, In Jacko and Sears (Editors), The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, LEA Publishers, Mahwah, NJ (2002), 583--595.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Plaisant, C. The Challenge of Information Visualization Evaluation, Proc. of Conf. on Advanced Visual Interfaces, ACM, New York (2004), 109--116.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rose, A., Plaisant, C., and Shneiderman, B., Using ethnographic methods in user interface re-engineering, Proc. DIS '95: Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, ACM Press, New York (1995), 115--122.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Saraiya, P., North, C., and Duca, K., An evaluation of microarray visualization tools for biological insight, Proc. of IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (2004), 1--8.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Seo, J. and Shneiderman, B., Knowledge discovery in high dimensional data: Case studies and a user survey for the rank-by-feature framework, IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 3 (May/June, 2006).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shneiderman, B., Creating creativity: User interfaces for supporting innovation, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 1 (March 2000), 114--138.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shneiderman, B., Fischer, G., Czerwinski, M., Resnick, M., Myers, B. and 13 others, Creativity Support Tools: Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation Sponsored Workshop, International Journal of Human---Computer Interaction 20, 2 (2006), 61--77.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Shneiderman, B. and Plaisant, C., Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction: Fourth Edition, Addison-Wesley Publ. Co., Reading, MA (April 2004), 684 pages.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sternberg, R. (Editor), Handbook of Creativity, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK (1999).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Suchman, L. A., Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, Cambridge University Press, UK (1987).]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Trafton, J., Tsui, T., Miyamoto, R.; Ballas, J., Raymond, P., Turning pictures into numbers: extracting and generating information from complex visualizations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 53, 5 (2000), 827--850.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. VAST contest: www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/VASTcontest06]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Warmington, A. Action Research: Its Methods and its Implications. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 7 (1980), 23--39]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Yin, R. K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 3rd Edition, Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks, CA. (2003).]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      BELIV '06: Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on BEyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization
      May 2006
      89 pages
      ISBN:1595935622
      DOI:10.1145/1168149

      Copyright © 2006 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 23 May 2006

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate45of64submissions,70%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader