Stuart K. Card
Jock D. Mackinlay
George G. Robertson
- 1 ALBERT, A. The effect of graphic input devices on performance in a cursor positioning task. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society-26th Annual Meeting (Seattle, Wash., Oct. 25-28, 1982). Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, Calif., 1982, pp. 54-58.Google Scholar
- 2 ANSON, E. The device model of interaction. Comput. Graph. 16, 3 (July 1982), 107-114. (Also, SIGGRAPH '82 Proceedings.) Google Scholar
- 3 APPLE COMPUTER. Technical Introduction to the Macintosh Family. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1987. Google Scholar
- 4 BAECKER, R. M., AND BUXTON, W., EDS. Readings in Human-Computer Interaction: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Kaufmann, Los Altos, Calif., 1987, pp. 357-365. Google Scholar
- 5 BERTZN, J. Semiology of Graphics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wis., 1983. (Translation by W. J. Berg of 1973 edition of Semiologie graphique.) Google Scholar
- 6 BLESER, T. W., AND SIBERT, J. Toto: A tool for selecting interaction techniques. In Proceedings of User Interface Software and Technology (Snowbird, Utah, Oct. 3-5, 1990). ACM, New York, 1990, pp. 135-142. Google Scholar
- 7 BUXTON, W. Lexical and pragmatic considerations of input structures. Comput. Graph. 17, I (Jan. 1983), 31-37. Google Scholar
- 8 CARD, S. K. Human factors and artificial intelligence, In Intelligent Interfaces: Theory, Research and Design, P. A. Hancock and M. H. Chignell, Eds. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989, pp. 270-284.Google Scholar
- 9 CARD, S. K., ENGLISH, W. K., AND BURR, B. J. Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 8 (Aug. 1978), 601-613.Google Scholar
- 10 CARROLL, J. M. Evaluation, description and invention: Paradigms for human-computer interaction. In Advances in Computers, vol. 29, M. C. Yovits, Ed. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1989, 47-77.Google Scholar
- 11 CASNER, S.M. A task-analytic approach to the automated design of graphic presentations. ACM Trans. Graph. 10, 2 (Apr. 1991), 111-151. Google Scholar
- 12 ENGLISH, W. K., ENGELBART, D. C., AND BERMAN, M. L. Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. IEEE Trans. Hum. Factors Electron. HFE-8, I (March 1967), 5-15.Google Scholar
- 13 EPPS, B., SNYDER, H., AND MUTOL, W. Comparison of six cursor devices on a target acquisition task. In Proceedings of the Society for Information Display (San Diego, Calif., May 6-8, 1986). Society for Information Display, 1986, pp. 302-305.Google Scholar
- 14 FITTS, P.M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement. J. Exper. Psychol. 47, 6 (June 1954), 381-391.Google Scholar
- 15 FOLEY, J. D., WALLACE, V. L., AND CHAN, P. The human factors of computer graphics interaction techniques. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 4, 11 (Nov. 1984), 13-48. Google Scholar
- 16 JELL~EK, H., AND CARD, S. K. (1990). Powermice and user performance. In CHI'90 Conference Proceedings (Seattle, Wash., Apr. 1-5, 1990). ACM Press, New York, 1990, pp. 213-220. Google Scholar
- 17 KARAT, J., McDONALD, J., AND ANDERSON, M. A comparison of selection techniques: Touch panel, mouse and keyboard. In Human-Computer Interaction--INTERACT 84, B. Shackel, Ed. Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 189-193.Google Scholar
- 18 LANOOLF, G.D. Human motor performance in precise microscopic work. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. of Indsutrial Engineering, Univ. of Mmhigan, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1973. (Also published by the MTM Association, Fairlawn, N J., 1973.)Google Scholar
- 19 MACKENZm, I. S. Fitts' law as a performance model in human-computer interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Education, Univ. of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1991. Google Scholar
- 20 MACKENzm, I.S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum-Comput. Interaction. In press. Google Scholar
- 21 MACKINLAY, J. Automatic design of graphical presentations. Ph.D. dissertation Computer Science Dept., Stanford Univ., Calif., 1986. (Also Tech. Rep. Stan-CS-86-1038.) Google Scholar
- 22 MACKINLAY, J. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Trans. Graph. 5, 2 (Apr. 1986), 110-141. Google Scholar
- 23 MACKINLAY, J. D., CARD, S. K., AND ROBERTSON, G. G. A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices. Hum.-Comput. Interaction 5, 2 3 (1990), 145-190.Google Scholar
- 24 OLSEN, D. R., AND HALVERSON, B. W. Interface usage measurements in a user interface management system. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software (Banff, Alberta, Canada, Oct. 17-19, 1988). ACM, New York, 1988, pp. 102-108. Google Scholar
- 25 OLSEN, D. R., ET AL. ACM SIGGRAPH workshop on software tools for user interface management. Comput. Graph. 21, 2 (April 1987), 71-147. Google Scholar
- 26 PENFmLD, W., AND RASMUSSEN, T. The Cerebral Cortex of Man: A Clinical Study of Localization of Function. Macmfilan, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
- 27 PFAFF, G.E. User Interface Management Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985. Google Scholar
- 28 RADWIN, R. G., VANDERHEIDEN, G. C., AND LIN, M. A method for evaluating head-controlled computer input devices using Fitts' law. Hum. Factors 32, 4 (Aug. 1990), 423 438. Google Scholar
- 29 ROBERTSON, G. G. , CARD, S. K., AND MACKINLAY, J. The cognitive coprocessor architecture for interactive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIGGRAPH Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Williamsburg, Va., Nov. 13-15, 1989). ACM, New York, 1989, pp. 10-18. Google Scholar
- 30 ROTH, S. F., MATT~S, J., AND MESNARD, X. Graphics and natural language as components of automatic explanation. In Intelligent User Interfaces, J. Sullivan and S. Tyler, Eds. ACM Press, New York, pp. 207-239. Google Scholar
- 31 SHEmDAN, T. B. Supervisory control of remote manipulators, vehicles and dynamic processes: Experiments in command and display aiding. Adv. Man-Machine Syst. Res. I (1984), 49-137.Google Scholar
- 32 SmWIOREK, D., BELL, G., AND NEWELL, A. Computer Structures. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
- 33 TANNER, P. P., AND BUXTON, W. A.S. Some issues in future UIMS development. In User Interface Management Systems, G. E. Pfaff, Ed. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985, pp. 67-79.Google Scholar
- 34 VAN DEN BOS, J Abstract interaction tools: A language for user interface management systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 10, 2 (July 1988), 215-247. Google Scholar
- 35 WELFORD, A.T. Fundamentals of Skill. Methuen, London, 1968.Google Scholar
- 36 WmTEFmLD, D., BALL, R., AND BraD, J. Some comparisons of on-display and off-display touch input devices for interaction with computer generated displays. Ergonomics 26, 11 (1983), 1033-1053.Google Scholar
- 37 ZWmKY, F. The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research, and construction. In New Methods of Thought and Procedure, F. Zwicky and A. G. Wilson, Eds. Springer- Verlag, New York, 1967, 273-297.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices
Recommendations
A morphological analysis of the design space of input devices
Readings in intelligent user interfacesScientific design rationale
Design rationale should be regarded both as a tool for the practice of design, and as a method to enable the science of design. Design rationale answers questions about why a given design takes the form that it does. Answers to these why questions ...
A survey of architecture design rationale
Many claims have been made about the consequences of not documenting design rationale. The general perception is that designers and architects usually do not fully understand the critical role of systematic use and capture of design rationale. However, ...
Comments