skip to main content
10.1145/1236360.1236364acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Improving wireless simulation through noise modeling

Published:25 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

We propose modeling environmental noise in order to efficiently and accurately simulate wireless packet delivery. We measure noise traces in many different environments and propose three algorithms to simulate noise from these traces. We evaluate applying these algorithms to signal-to-noise curves in comparison to existing simulation approaches used in EmStar, TOSSIM, and ns2. We measure simulation accuracy using the Kantorovich-Wasserstein distance on conditional packet delivery functions. We demonstrate that using a closest-fit pattern matching (CPM) noise model can capture complex temporal dynamics which existing approaches do not, increasing packet simulation fidelity by a factor of 2 for good links, a factor of 1.5 for bad links, and a factor of 5 for intermediate links. As our models are derived from real-world traces, they can be generated for many different environments.

References

  1. Sensor network emulator/simulator/debugger. http://www.cshcn.umd.edu/research/atemu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. The Network Simulator - ns-2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. TinyOS 2.0. http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. TOSSIM 2.x. http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Cerpa, N. Busek, and D. Estrin. Scale: A tool for simple connectivity assessment in lossy environments. Technical Report 0021, Sept. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Cerpa, J. L. Wong, M. Potkonjak, and D. Estrin. Temporal properties of low power wireless links: Modeling and implications on multi-hop routing. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MOBIHOC'05), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Conner and J. Hammond. Modeling of stochastic system inputs having prescribed distribution and covariance functions. In Applied Mathematical Modeling, volume 3, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Deutsch. Nonlinear Transformations of Random Processes. Prentice-Hall, 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Ganesan, B. Krishnamachari, A. Woo, D. Culler, D. Estrin, and S. Wicker. An empirical study of epidemic algorithms in large scale multihop wireless networks. UCLA Computer Science Technical Report UCLA/CSD-TR 02-0013, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Girod, T. Stathopoulos, N. Ramanathan, J. Elson, D. Estrin, E. Osterweil, and T. Schoellhammer. A system for simulation, emulation, and deployment of heterogeneous sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems (SenSys), pages 201--213, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. C. Givens and R. Shortt. A class of wasserstein metrics for probability distributions. In Michigan Math. J., volume 31, pages 231--240, 1884.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. H. Hashemi. The Indoor Radio Propagation Channel. Proceedings of the IEEE., 81(7), July 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. G. Johnson. Constructions of particular random process. In Proceedings of the IEEE, volume 82, pages 270--285, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. J. Johnson. Thermal agitation of electricity in conductors. Physics Review, 32(97), 1928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Levis, N. Lee, M. Welsh, and D. Culler. TOSSIM: Simulating large wireless sensor networks of tinyos motes. In Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys),2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Lin, T. He, J. Zhang, G. Zhou, L. Gu, and J. A. Stankovic. Atpc: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. H. Nyquist. Thermal agitation of electric charge in conductors. Physics Review, 32(110), 1928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Y. Rubner, C. Tomasi, and L. J. Guibas. A metric for distributions with applications to image databases. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 59--66, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Y. Seidel and T. S. Rappaport. 914 MHz path loss prediction models for indoor wireless communications in multifloored buildings. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation., 40(2), Feb 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. D. Son, B. Krishnamachari, and J. Heidemann. Experimental study of concurrent transmission in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. K. Srinivasan, P. Dutta, A. Tavakoli, and P. Levis. Understanding the causes of packet delivery success and failure in dense wireless sensor networks. In Technical report SING-06-00, Stanford, CA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. B. L. Titzer, D. K. Lee, and J. Palsberg. Avrora: scalable sensor network simulation with precise timing. In IPSN '05: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on Information processing in sensor networks, page 67, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2005. IEEE Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Tognarelli, J. Zhao, and A. Kareem. Equivalent statistical cubicization: A frequency domain approach for nonlinearities in both system and forcing function. In Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, volume 123, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Zhao and R. Govindan. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M. Zuniga and B. Krishnamachari. Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links. In First IEEE International Conference on Sensor and Ad hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Improving wireless simulation through noise modeling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IPSN '07: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Information processing in sensor networks
      April 2007
      592 pages
      ISBN:9781595936387
      DOI:10.1145/1236360

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate143of593submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader