skip to main content
10.1145/1240624.1240630acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How it works: a field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system

Published:29 April 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

In order to develop intelligent systems that attain the trust of their users, it is important to understand how users perceive such systems and develop those perceptions over time. We present an investigation into how users come to understand an intelligent system as they use it in their daily work. During a six-week field study, we interviewed eight office workers regarding the operation of a system that predicted their managers' interruptibility, comparing their mental models to the actual system model. Our results show that by the end of the study, participants were able to discount some of their initial misconceptions about what information the system used for reasoning about interruptibility. However, the overarching structures of their mental models stayed relatively stable over the course of the study. Lastly, we found that participants were able to give lay descriptions attributing simple machine learning concepts to the system despite their lack of technical knowledge. Our findings suggest an appropriate level of feedback for user interfaces of intelligent systems, provide a baseline level of complexity for user understanding, and highlight the challenges of making users aware of sensed inputs for such systems.

References

  1. Antifakos, S. Kern, N., Schiele, B., Schwaninger, A., (2005) Towards improving trust in context-aware systems by displaying system confidence. In Proc. MobileHCI 2005, pp. 9--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bellotti, V. and Edwards, W.K. (2001) Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems, Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2--4):193--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Birnbaum, L., Horvitz, E., Kurlander, D., Lieberman, H., Marks, J., and Roth, S. (1997). Compelling intelligent user interfaces--how much AI? In Proc. of IUI'97, pp. 173--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Borgman, C. (1986) The User's Mental Model of an Information Retrieval System. 'Int'l Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24(1):47--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cannon-Bowers, J.E., Salas, E., and Converse, S. (1993) Shared Mental Models in Expert Team Decision-Making," In Individual and Group Decision-Making: Current Issues, J. Castellan, (ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi, M.T.H. (2000). Self-explaining expository texts: The dual processes of generating inferences and repairing mental models. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in Instructional Psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 161--238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Dourish, P. (1995). Accounting for System Behaviour: Representation, Reflection and Resourceful Action. In Proc. of Conference on Computers in Context CIC'95, pp. 145--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dzindolet, M., Peterson, S., Pomranky, S. Pierce, L. and Beck, H. (2003) The role of trust in automation reliance, 'Int'l Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 58(6):697--718. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Fogarty, J., Hudson, S.E., and Lai, J. (2004). Examining the Robustness of Sensor-Based Statistical Models of Human Interruptibility. In Proc. ofallCHI 2004, pp. 207--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Fogarty, J. and Hudson, S.E. (2007) Toolkit Support for Developing and Deploying Sensor-Based Statistical Models of Human Situations. To Appear, CHI 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Herlocker , J., Konstan , and J., Riedl, J. (2000) Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations, In Proc. of CSCW 2000, pp.241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Johnson, H. and Johnson, P. (1993) Explanation facilities and interactive systems. In Proc. of IUI'93, pp. 159--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kempton, W. (1987) Two theories of home heat control. In N. Quinn & D. Holland (Eds.) Cultural Models in Language and Thought, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kendon, A. and Ferber, A. (1973) A description of some human greetings. In R. Michael and J. Crook (Eds.), Comparative Ecology and Behavior of Primates, pp. 591--668. New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kohavi, R. and John, G.H. (1997) Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection, Artificial Intelligence 97(1--2):273--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Maes, P. (1994) Agents that Reduce Work and Information Overload. Communications of the ACM, 37(7):31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Moray, N. (1987) Intelligent Aids, Mental Models, and the Theory of Machines. 'Int'l Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27 (5):619--629. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Morgan, M.G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A. and Atman, C.J. (2002) Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Muir, B. (1994) Trust in automation Part I: Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics 37(11):1905--1922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Muramatsu, J. and Pratt, W. (2001) Transparent Queries: Investigating Users' Mental Models of Search Engines, In Proc. of SIGIR 2001, pp. 217--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Norman, D.A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Gentner & A.Stevens (Eds.) Mental Models, pp. 7--15. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Suermondt, J. and Cooper, G. (1992) An Evaluation of Explanations of Probabilistic Inference. In Proc. Computer Applications in Medical Care, pp. 579--585.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science 185(4157):1124--1131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Williams, M.D., Hollan, J.D., and Stevens, A.L. (1983) Human Reasoning about a Simple Physical System. In D. Gentner & A. Stevens (Eds.) Mental Models, pp. 131--154. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How it works: a field study of non-technical users interacting with an intelligent system

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2007
        1654 pages
        ISBN:9781595935939
        DOI:10.1145/1240624

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 April 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '07 Paper Acceptance Rate182of840submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader