skip to main content
10.1145/1273496.1273511acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Cluster analysis of heterogeneous rank data

Published:20 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cluster analysis of ranking data, which occurs in consumer questionnaires, voting forms or other inquiries of preferences, attempts to identify typical groups of rank choices. Empirically measured rankings are often incomplete, i.e. different numbers of filled rank positions cause heterogeneity in the data. We propose a mixture approach for clustering of heterogeneous rank data. Rankings of different lengths can be described and compared by means of a single probabilistic model. A maximum entropy approach avoids hidden assumptions about missing rank positions. Parameter estimators and an efficient EM algorithm for unsupervised inference are derived for the ranking mixture model. Experiments on both synthetic data and real-world data demonstrate significantly improved parameter estimates on heterogeneous data when the incomplete rankings are included in the inference process.

References

  1. Ailon, N., Charikar, M., & Newman, A. (2005). Aggregating inconsistent information: Ranking and clustering. ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beckett, L. A. (1993). Maximum likelihood estimation in Mallows' model using partially ranked data. In M. A. Fligner and J. S. Verducci (Eds.), Probability models and statistical analyses for ranking data.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Critchlow, D. (1985). Metric methods for analyzing partially ranked data. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Diaconis, P. (1988). Group representations in probability and statistics. Institute of Mathematical Statistics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Diaconis, P. (1989). A generalization of spectral analysis with applications to ranked data. Annals of Statistics, 17, 949--979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fligner, M. A., & Verducci, J. S. (1986). Distance based rank models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 48, 359--369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hofmann, T., & Buhmann, J. (1997). Pairwise data clustering by deterministic annealing. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 19, 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Kendall, M. G. (1938). A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika, 30, 81--93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., & Vecchi, M. P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220, 671--680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lebanon, G., & Lafferty, J. (2002). Cranking: Combining rankings using conditional probability models on permutations. International Conference on Machine Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mallows, C. L. (1957). Non-null ranking models I. Biometrika, 44, 114--130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Marden, J. I. (1995). Analyzing and modeling rank data. Chapman & Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Murphy, T. B., & Martin, D. (2003). Mixtures of distance-based models for ranking data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 41, 645--655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Cluster analysis of heterogeneous rank data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICML '07: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
      June 2007
      1233 pages
      ISBN:9781595937933
      DOI:10.1145/1273496

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 20 June 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader