skip to main content
10.1145/1276958.1276967acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An artificial immune system with partially specified antibodies

Published:07 July 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Artificial Immune System algorithms use antibodies which fully specify the solution of an optimization, learning, or pattern recognition problem. By being restricted to fully specified antibodies, an AIS algorithm can not make use of schemata or classes of partial solutions. This paper presents a symbiotic artificial immune system (SymbAIS) algorithm which is an extension of CLONALG algorithm. It uses partially specified antibodies and gradually builds up building blocks of suitable sub-antibodies. The algorithm is compared with CLONALG on multimodal function optimization and combinatorial optimization problems and it is shown that it can solve problems that CLONALG is unable to solve.

References

  1. Ada G. L., and Nossal G. The Clonal Selection Theory. Scientific American, 257, 2, 1987, 50--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Coello C., Cortes N. Solving Multiobjective Optimization Problems Using an Artificial Immune System. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 6, 2 (June 2005), 163--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cortés N. C., and Coello Coello C. A. Multiobjective Optimization Using Ideas from the Clonal Selection Principle. GECCO 2003, Chicago, IL, USAGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cui X., Li M., and Fang T. Study of population diversity of multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on immune and entropy principles. in Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2001 (CEC'2001), IEEE Service Center: Piscataway, New Jersey, Vol.2, (May 2001), 1316--1321.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dasgupta D. Artificial Immune Systems and Their Applications. Ed., Springer-Verlag, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. de Castro, L.N., and Timmis J., An Artificial Immune Network for Multimodal Optimisation. In Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Part of the 2002 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence., Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. IEEE, 699--704.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. de Castro, L.N., and Timmis J. Artificial Immune Systems as a Novel Soft Computing Paradigm. Soft Computing, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. de Castro L. N., and Von Zuben F. J. Artificial Immune Systems: Part I -- Basic Theory and Applications, EEC/Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Tech. Rep. -- RT DCA 01/99, p. 95. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. de Castro, L. N., and Von Zuben, F. J. Artificial Immune Systems: Part II -- A Survey of Applications. Tech. Rep. -- RT DCA 02/00, p. 65. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. de Castro, L. N., and Von Zuben, F. J. Learning and optimization using the clonal selection principle. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 3, 2002, 239--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. de Castro, L. N., and Von Zuben, F. J. aiNet: An Artificial Immune Network for Data Analysis. Data Mining: A heuristic Approach, Chapter XII, 2002, 231--259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Deb, K. Binary and floating point function optimization using messy genetic algorithms (IlliGAL Report No. 91004). Urbana: University of Illinoise at Urbana--Champaign, Illinois Genetic Algorithms Laboratory, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eiben, A.E., Raué, P.E. and Ruttkay, Z. GA-easy and GA-hard Constraint Satisfaction Problems. Constraint Processing, Manfred Meyer, Eds. Springer--Verlag LNCS 923, 1995, 267--283. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Farmer, J., Packard, N., and Perelson, A. The immune system, adaptation and machinenlearning. Physica D, 22:187--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Forrest, S., and Perelson, A. Genetic algorithms and the immune system. in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, H.--P. Schwefel and R. Manner Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer--Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1991, 320--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Forrest, S., Perelson, A., Allen, L., and Cherukuri, R. (1994). Self-nonself discrimination in a computer. In Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy. 1994, 132--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Goldberg, D.E., Korb, B., and Deb, K. Messy Genetic Algorithms: Motivation, analysis, and first results. Computer Systems, 3, 5, 1989, 493--530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Harik, R. Learning Gene Linkage to Efficiently Solve Problems of Bounded Difficulty Using Genetic Algorithm. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana--Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Hodgkin, P. D. Role of Cross-Reactivity in the Development of Antibody Responses. The Immunologist, 6, 6, 1998, 223--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hofmeyr, A., and Forrest . Immunity by Design: An Artificial Immune System. in Proc. of GECCO'99, 1999, 1289--1296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Holland, J.H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hunt, J., and Cooke, D. An adaptive and distributed learning system based on the Immune system. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, 1995, 2494--2499.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunt, J. E., and Cooke, D. E. Learning Using an Artificial Immune System. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 19, 1996, 189--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kurpati, A., and Azarm. Immune network simulation with multiobjective genetic algorithms for multidisciplinary design optimization. Engineering Optimization, 33, 2000, 245--260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Mason, D. Antigen Cross-Reactivity: Essential in the Function of TCRs. The Immunologist, 6, 6, 1998, 220--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Maynard Smith, J., and Szathmary, E. The Major Transitions in Evolution, WH Freeman: Oxford UK, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Merezhkovsky, K. The Theory of Two Plasms as the Basis of Symbiogenesis, a New Study or the Origins of Organisms. Proceedings of the Studies of the Imperial Kazan University, Publishing Office of the Imperial University, (In Russian), 1909.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Potter, M. A., and De Jong, K. A. A Cooperative Coevolutionary Approach to Function Optimization. in Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN III), Y. Davidor, H.--P. Schwefel and R. Manner, Eds. Berlin: Springer--Verlag, 1994, 249--257. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Seiden, P. E. and Celada, F. A Model for Simulating Cognate Recognition and Response in the Immune System. J. theor. Biol., 158, 1992, 329--357Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, D. J., Forrest ., Hightower, R. R., and Perelson, A. Deriving Shape Space Parameters fromImmunological Data. J. Theor. Biol., 189, 1997, 141--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Smith, R. E., Forrest ., and Perelson, A. Searching for diverse, cooperative populations with genetic algorithms. Technical Report TCGA No. 92002, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, R. E., Forrest ., and Perelson, A. Population diversity in an immune system model: Implications for genetic search. in Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, L. D. Whitley, Eds. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers: San Mateo, CA, 1993, vol. 2, pp. 153--165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Sprent, J. T and B Memory Cells. Cell, 76, 1994, 315--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Timmis, J. Artificial Immune Systems: A Novel Data Analysis Technique Inspired by the Immune Network Theory. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Wales, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Timmis J, Knight T., de Castro L. N., and Hart E. An overview of artificial immune systems. In Computation in Cells and Tissues: Perspectives and Tools for Thought, R. Paton, H. Bolouri, M. Holcombe, J. H. Parish and R. Tateson, Eds. Natural Computation Series, Springer, November 2004, 51--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Timmis, J., Neal, M., and Hunt, J. An Artificial Immune System for Data Analysis. Biosystems. 55, 1, 2000, 143--150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Varela, F. J., and Coutinho, A. Second Generation Immune Networks, Imm. Today, 12, 5, 1991, 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Watson, R.A., Pollack, J.B. Incremental Commitment in Genetic Algorithms, Proceedings of GECCO 1999. Banzhaf, et al. eds., Morgan Kaufmann, 1999, 710--717.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Watson, R.A., Pollack, J.B. Symbiotic Combination as an Alternative to Sexual Recombination in Genetic Algorithms, Proceedings of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN VI), 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Yoo, J., and Hajela, P. Immune network simulations in multicriterion design. Structural Optimization, 18, 1999, 85--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. An artificial immune system with partially specified antibodies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      GECCO '07: Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation
      July 2007
      2313 pages
      ISBN:9781595936974
      DOI:10.1145/1276958

      Copyright © 2007 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 July 2007

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      GECCO '07 Paper Acceptance Rate266of577submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

      Upcoming Conference

      GECCO '24
      Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
      July 14 - 18, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader