skip to main content
article

Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability

Published:01 September 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Various accessibility activities are improving blind access to the increasingly indispensable WWW. These approaches use various metrics to measure the Web's accessibility. “Ease of navigation” (navigability) is one of the crucial factors for blind usability, especially for complicated webpages used in portals and online shopping sites. However, it is difficult for automatic checking tools to evaluate the navigation capabilities even for a single webpage. Navigability issues for complete Web applications are still far beyond their capabilities.

This study aims at obtaining quantitative results about the current accessibility status of real world Web applications, and analyzes real users' behavior on such websites. In Study 1, an automatic analysis method for webpage navigability is introduced, and then a broad survey using this method for 30 international online shopping sites is described. The next study (Study 2) focuses on a fine-grained analysis of real users' behavior on some of these online shopping sites. We modified a voice browser to record each user's actions and the information presented to that user. We conducted user testing on existing sites with this tool. We also developed an analysis and visualization method for the recorded information. The results showed us that users strongly depend on scanning navigation instead of logical navigation. A landmark-oriented navigation model was proposed based on the results. Finally, we discuss future possibilities for improving navigability, including proposals for voice browsers.

References

  1. Arons, B. 1997. SpeechSkimmer: A system for interactively skimming recorded speech. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. 4, 1, 3--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Asakawa, C. and Ito, T. 1998. User interface of a home page reader. In Proceedings of Assets '98: The 3rd International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Marina del Rey, CA, Apr.). ACM, New York, 149--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Asakawa, C. and Takagi, H. 2000. Annotation-based transcoding for nonvisual Web access. In Proceedings of Assets '00: The 4th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Arlington, VA, Nov.). ACM, New York, 172--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Asakawa, C., Takagi, H., Ino, S., and Ifukube, T. 2004. TAJODA: Proposed tactile and jog dial interface for the blind. Trans. IEICE, E87-D, 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnicle, K. 2000. Usability testing with screen reading technology in a Windows environment. In Proceedings of CUU '00: The Conference on Universal Usability (Arlington, VA, Nov.). ACM, New York, 102--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., and Lewis, C. 2002. Cognitive walkthrough for the Web. In Proceedings of CHI '02: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Minneapolis, MN, Apr.). ACM, New York, 463--470. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Blackmon, M. H., Kitajima, M., and Polson, P. G. 2005. Tool for accurately predicting website navigation problems, non-problems, problem severity, and effectiveness of repairs. In Proceedings of CHI '05: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, OR, Apr.). ACM, New York, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cabinet Office Japan. 2004. Annual report on government measures for persons with disabilities 2004. (See http://www8.cao.go.jp/shougai/whitepaper/h16hakusho/zenbun/(in Japanese)).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Card, S. K., Pirolli, P., Wege, M. V. D., Morrison, J. B., Reeder, R. W., Schraedley, P. K., and Boshart, J. 2001. Information scent as a driver of Web behavior graphs: Results of a protocol analysis method for Web usability. In Proceedings of CHI '01: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, WA, Mar.). ACM, New York, 498-- 505. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Challis, B. P. and Edwards, A. D. N. 2000. Weasel: A computer based system for providing non-visual access to music notation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCAPH Computers and the Physically Handicapped. ACM, New York, 1--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. 1999. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/.). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. 2000. HTML Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Note. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10-HTML-TECHS/.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, J. and Derose, S. 1999. XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation (See http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath/.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fukuda, K., Takagi, H., Maeda, J., and Asakawa, C. 2003. An assist method for realizing a Web page structure for blind people. In Proceedings of UAHCI '03: The 2nd International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (June). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 960--964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Goble, C., Harper, S., and Stevens, R. 2000. The travails of visually impaired web travellers. In Proceedings of the 11th International ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. ACM, New York, 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hanson, V. L., Brezin, J. P., Crayne, S., Keates, S., Kjeldsen, R., Richards, J. T., Swart, C., and Trewin, S. 2005. Improving Web accessibility through an enhanced open-source browser. IBM J. Res. Devel. 44, 3, 573--588. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jacobs, I. and Brewer, J. 1999. Accessibility Features of CSS. W3C Note. (See http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS-access.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nchs. 1996. National health interview survey on disability 1994--1995, NCHS (National Center for Health Statistics). (See http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis_dis/nhis_dis.htm.)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Pirolli, P. 2006. The use of proximal information scent to forage for distal content on the World Wide Web. In Working with Technology in Mind: Adaptive Perspectives on Human-Technology Interaction, A. Kirlik, Ed. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Plessers, P., Casteleyn, S., Yesilada, Y., Troyer, O. D., Stevens, R., Harper, S., and Goble, C. 2005. Accessibility: A web engineering approach. In Proceedings of WWW '05: The 14th International Conference on World Wide Web (Chiba, Japan, May). ACM, New York, 353--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pontelli, E., Gillan, D., Xiong, W., Saad, E., Gupta, G., and Karshmer, A. I. 2002. Navigation of HTML tables, frames, and XML fragments. In Proceedings of Assets '02: The 5th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Edinburgh, Scotland, July). ACM, New York, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Salampasis, M., Kouroupetroglou, C., and Manitsaris, A. 2005. Semantically enhanced browsing for blind people in the WWW. In Proceedings of HYPERTEXT '05: The 16th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia (Salzburg, Austria, Sept.). ACM, New York, 32--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Seeman, L. 2006. Role taxonomy for accessible adaptable applications, See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/GUI/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwerdtfeger, R. 2001. Dynamic Accessible Web Content Roadmap, See http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/roadmap/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stevens, R. 1996. Principles for the design of auditory interfaces to present complex, information to blind people. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York, York, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Takagi, H. and Asakawa, C. 2000. Transcoding proxy for nonvisual Web access. In Proceedings of Assets '00: The 4th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Arlington, VA, Nov.). ACM, New York, 164--171. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., and Maeda, J. 2002. Site-wide annotation: Reconstructing existing pages to be accessible. In Proceedings of Assets '02: The 5th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Edinburgh, Scotland, July). ACM, New York, 81--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Takagi, H., Asakawa, C., Fukuda, K., and Maeda, J. 2004. Accessibility designer: Visualizing usability for the blind. In Proceedings of Assets '04: The 6th International ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (Atlanta, GA, Oct.). ACM, New York, 177-- 184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Theofanos, M. F. and Redish, J. G. 2003. Bridging the gap: Between accessibility and usability. ACM Interact 10, 6, 36--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Watanabe, T. 2002. Windows PCs and internet usage survey for people with visual impairments in Japan. The National Institute of Special Education Research Note (See http://www.nise.go.jp/research/kogaku/twatanab/PCUserSurvey/Survey2002/Survey2002Jp. html (in Japanese)).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., and Goble, C. 2003. A foundation for tool based mobility support for visually impaired web users. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web (Budapest, Hungary, May). ACM, New York, 422--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., Harper, S., and Goble, C. 2007. Evaluating DANTE: Semantic Transcoding for Visually Disabled Users. ACM Trans. Comput.-Human Interact. (TOCHI) 14, 3 (Sept.), Article 14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability

                          Recommendations

                          Comments

                          Login options

                          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                          Sign in

                          Full Access

                          PDF Format

                          View or Download as a PDF file.

                          PDF

                          eReader

                          View online with eReader.

                          eReader