skip to main content
article

Evaluating DANTE: Semantic transcoding for visually disabled users

Published:01 September 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The importance of the World Wide Web for information dissemination is indisputable. However, the dominance of visual design on the Web leaves visually disabled people at a disadvantage. Although assistive technologies, such as screen readers, usually provide basic access to information, the richness of the Web experience is still often lost. In particular, traversing the Web becomes a complicated task since the richness of visual objects presented to their sighted counterparts are neither appropriate nor accessible to visually disabled users. To address this problem, we have proposed an approach called Dante in which Web pages are annotated with semantic information to make their traversal properties explicit. Dante supports usage of different annotation techniques and as a proof-of-concept in this article, pages are annotated manually which when transcoded become rich. We first introduce Dante and then present a user evaluation which compares how visually disabled users perform certain travel-related tasks on original and transcoded versions of Web pages. We discuss the evaluation methodology in detail and present our findings, which provide useful insights into the transcoding process. Our evaluation shows that, in tests with users, document objects transcoded with Dante have a tendency to be much easier for visually disabled users to interact with when traversing Web pages.

References

  1. Amitay, E., Carmel, D., Darlow, A., Lempel, R., and Soffer, A. 2003. The connectivity sonar: Detecting site functionality by structural patterns. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. ACM Press, 38--47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Asakawa, C. and Takagi, H. 2000. Annotation-based transcoding for nonvisual web access. In Proceedings of ASSETS'00. ACM Press, 172--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Atzeni, P., Mecca, G., and Merialdo, P. 1997. To weave the web. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. 206--215. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Berners-Lee, T. 2000. Weaving the Web. Texere.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bickmore, T. and Schilit, B. 1997. Digestor: Device-independent access to the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the 6th International World Wide Web Conference. 655--663. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brajnik, G., Cancila, D., Nicoli, D., and Pignatelli, M. 2005. Do text transcoders improve usability for disabled users? In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A'05). 9--17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brown, S. and Robinson, P. 2001. A World Wide Web mediator for users with low vision. In CHI 2001 Workshop, Universal Design: Towards Universal Access in the Information Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Buyukkokten, O., Kaljuvee, O., Molina, H., Paepcke, A., and Winograd, T. 2002. Efficient Web browsing on handheld devices using page and form summarization. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 20, 1, 82--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Carr, L., Kampa, S., Hall, W., Bechhofer, S., and Goble, C. 2004. Handbook on Ontologies. (Chapter COHSE: Conceptual Open Hypermedia Service). Springer, 193--209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, J., Zhou, B., Shi, J., Zhang, H., and Wu, Q. 2001. Function-based object towards Web site adaptation. In Proceedings of the 10th International World Wide Web Conference. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chen, Y., Ma, W., and Zhang, H. 2003. Detecting Web page structure for adaptive viewing on small form factor devices. In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chisholm, W., Vanderheiden, G., and Jacobs, I. 1999. Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-WEBCONTENT/. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Cove, J. and Walsh, B. 1998. Online text retrieval via browsing. Inform. Proc. Manag. 24, 1, 31--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Coyne, K. P. and Nielsen, J. 2001. Beyond ALT text: Making the Web easy to use for users with disabilities. Nielson Norman Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Craven, J. and Brophy, P. 2003. Nonvisual access to the digital library: The use of digital library interfaces by blind and visually impaired people. Library and Information Commission Research Report 145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G., and Beale, R. 2004. Human-Computer Interaction 3rd Ed. Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Edwards, A. and Stevens, R. 1997. Visual dominance and the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the 6th International World Wide Web Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Goble, C., Harper, S., and Stevens, R. 2000. The travails of visually impaired web travellers. In the 11th International ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia. 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gunderson, J. and Jacobs, I. 1999. User agent accessibility guidelines 1.0. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Harper, S. and Bechhofer, S. 2005. Semantic triage for increased accessibility. IBM Syst. J. 44, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Harper, S., Stevens, R., and Goble, C. 1999. Towel: Real world mobility on the Web. In Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces II, J. Vanderdonckt and A. Puerta, Eds. Kluwer Academic, 305--314. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hart, S. and Staveland, L. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Human Mental Workload, P. A. Hancock and N. Meshkati, Eds. North-Holland: Elsevier Science, 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hori, M., Kondoh, G., and Ono, K. 2000. Annotation-based Web content transcoding. In Proceedings of the 9th International World Wide Web Conference. 197--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Hori, M., Ono, K., Koyanagi, T., and Abe, M. 2002. Annotation for transformation for the automatic generation of content customization metadata. In Pervasive, F. Mattern and M. Naghshineh, Eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2414, Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Howell, J. 2000. Get the Message Online. Royal National Institute of the Blind (RNIB).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ivory, M., Mankoff, J., and Le, A. 2003. Using automated tools to improve Web site usage by users with diverse abilities. Inform. Techn. Soc. (Special Issue on Web Navigation Skills) 3, 1, 195--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly, B. 2002. Webwatch: An accessibility analysis of UK university entry points. Tech. rep., The University of Bath- Ariadne Issue 33. http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/web-watch/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowe, D. and Hall, W. 1998. Hypermedia and the Web: An Engineering Approach. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Lynch, K. 1960. The Image of the City. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. McGuinness, D. and Harmelen, F. 2004. OWL Web ontology language reference. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-features-20040210/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Nielsen, J. 1996. Inverted pyramids in cyberspace. Alertbox. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9606.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Nielsen, J. 1997. How users read on the Web. Alertbox. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9710a.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Paciello, M. 2000. Web Accessibility for People with Disabilities. CMP books, CMP media LLC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Parmanto, B., Ferrydiansyah, R., Saptono, A., Song, L., Sugiantara, I. W., and Hackett, S. 2005. Access: Accessibility through simplification and summarization. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A'05). 18--25. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Passini, R. 1984. Wayfinding in Architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Plessers, P., Casteleyn, S., Yesilada, Y., Troyer, O. D., Stevens, R., Harper, S., and Goble, C. 2005. Accessibility: A Web engineering approach. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on World Wide Web. 353--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Rep. 2002. A report into key government Web sites. Tech. rep., UK. http://www.iablondon.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Rep. 2004. The Web: Access and inclusion for disabled people. Tech. rep., Disability Rights Commission (DRC), UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Richards, J. and Hanson, V. 2004. Web accessibility: A broader view. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. RNIB, AbilityNet, DCU, RNID, and Socitm. 2005. Eaccessibility of public sector services in the European Union. European Union policy survey, UK Government Cabinet Office.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Seeman, L. 2004. The semantic Web, Web accessibility, and device independence. In Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A), S. Harper, Y. Yesilada, and C. Goble, Eds. 67--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Stevens, R. and Edwards, A. 1996. An approach to the evaluation of assistive technology. In Proceedings of Assets'96. ACM Press, 64--71. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Takagi, H., Saito, S., Fukuda, K., and Asakawa, C. 2007. Analysis of navigability of Web applications for improving blind usability. Trans. Hum. Comput. Interac. 14, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Thatcher, J., Bohman, P., Burks, M., Henry, S., Regan, B., Swierenga, S., Urban, M., and Waddell, C. 2002. Constructing Accessible Web Sites. Glasshaus. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Whang, Y., Jung, C., Kim, J., and Chung, S. 2001. Webalchemist: A Web transcoding system for mobile web access in handheld devices. In Optoelectronic and Wireless Data Management, Processing, Storage, and Retrieval. 102--109.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Wright, P. 1981. Tables in text: The subskills needed for reading formatted information. In The Reader and The Text, L. Chapman, Ed. Heineman, 60--69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Wright, P. and Monk, A. 1991. A cost effective evaluation method for use by designers. Inter. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 35, 6, 891--9120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Yesilada, Y., Harper, S., Goble, C., and Stevens, R. 2004a. Dante annotation and transformation of Web pages for visually impaired users. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Yesilada, Y., Harper, S., Goble, C., and Stevens, R. 2004b. Screen readers cannot see (ontology based semantic annotation for visually impaired Web travellers). In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE'04). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3140, N. Koch, P. Fraternali, and M. Wirsing, Eds. Springer, 445--458.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Yesilada, Y., Stevens, R., and Goble, C. 2003. A foundation for tool-based mobility support for visually impaired Web users. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web. 422--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Yin, X. and Lee, W. 2004. Using link analysis to improve layout on mobile devices. In Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference. 338--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating DANTE: Semantic transcoding for visually disabled users

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
              ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 14, Issue 3
              September 2007
              124 pages
              ISSN:1073-0516
              EISSN:1557-7325
              DOI:10.1145/1279700
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 2007 ACM

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 September 2007
              Published in tochi Volume 14, Issue 3

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader