Karl R. Lang
ABSTRACT
Digital culture products are easily reproduced, easily distributed, and subject to endless transmutation, extension and recombination. This sets the stage for the emergence of maturing markets for open source modes of cultural content production. This paper explores two previously unstudied structures of such markets. First, we consider a market that offers products with content access and transmutation rights to consumers and lets them personalize products in the post-purchase environment. Second, we consider an open source production model where producers can trade content access rights that let other producer reuse their content in their own production process. Our experimental results show that, as predicted by theory, total surplus under both options is larger than under the no-tradable- transmutation-rights option. The presence of open source access and transmutation rights diffuses monopoly power without hurting producers. profits. The paper also provides a basic experimental framework for testing many other alternative copyright arrangements and provides further understanding of issues related to the production and exchange of digital information goods.
- Aghion P., and Howitt, P. (1999), Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Alderman, J. (2001). Sonic Boom: Napster, P2P and the Battle for the Future of Music. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
- Arrow, K. (1962). "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing." The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3): pp. 155--173.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bakos, Y., Brynjolfson, E., & Lichtman, D. (1999). "Shared Information Goods", Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1), 117--155.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bikhchandani, S. & Mamer, J. "Competitive equilibrium in an Exchange Economy with Indivisibilities" Journal of Economic Theory, v74 1997, pg. 385--413.Google Scholar
- Boldrin, M. & Levine, D. (2002). "The Case Against Intellectual Property." American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 209--212.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen, Y., & Png, I. (2003). "Information Goods Pricing and Copyright Enforcement: Welfare Analysis." Information Systems Research, 14(1): pp. 107--123. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Choi, S., Stahl, D. & Whinston, A. (1997). The Economics of Electronic Commerce. Macmillan Technical Publishing: Indianapolis, IN. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clemons, E., Gu, B. & Lang, K. (2002). "Newly vulnerable markets in an age of pure information products: an analysis of online music and news." Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(3): pp. 17--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Farrell, J. & Shapiro, C., (2004). Intellectual Property, competition, and information technology, in H. R. Varian, J. Farrell, and C. Shapiro (eds.), The Economics of Information Technology, Cambridge University Press, pp. 49--87.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gamma, G., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J.(1995), Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Granados, Gupta & Kauffman (2005). "Identifying Facilitators and Inhibitors of Market Structure Change: A Hybrid Theory of Unbiased Electronic Markets," in Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference in System Sciences. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hughes, J. & Lang, K. R. (2006). "Open Source Culture and Digital Remix: A Theoretical Framework." Forthcoming in Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), Fall 2006.Google Scholar
- Hui, K. & Png, I. (2002). "On the Supply of Creative Work: Evidence from the Movies." American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 217--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katz, M. (2004). Capturing Sound: How Technology Has Changed Music, University of California Press: Berkeley, California.Google Scholar
- Kauffman, R. & Walden, E. (2001). "Economics and Electronic Commerce: Survey and Directions for Research." International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(4): pp. 5--116. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klein, B., Lerner, A. & Murphy, K. (2002). "The Economics of Copyright 'Fair Use' in a Networked World." American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 205--208.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Krishnan, R, Michael D. Smith, M. D., & Telang R. (2003), The Economics of Peer-to-Peer Networks, Journal of Information Technology Theory and Applications, 5(3), 31--44, 2003.Google Scholar
- Landes, W. & Posner, R. (1989). "An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law", Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), pp. 325--363.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lessig, L. (2001), The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World, Random House, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lessig, L. 2004. Free Culture, Penguin Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Liebowitz, S. (1985). "Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals", Journal of Political Economy, 93(5), pp. 945--957.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liebowitz, S. (2002). Re-Thinking the Network Economy, American Management Association, New York, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Litman, J. (2001). Digital Copyright, New York: Prometheus Books. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parker, G., & von Alstyne, M. (2005). "Mechanism design to promote free market and open source innovation." in Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference in System Sciences. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Romer, P. (1986). "Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth." Journal of Political Economy, 94(5): pp.1002--1037.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Romer, P. (1990), "Endogenous Technological Change." Journal of Political Economy, 98(5.2), S71--S102.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Romer, P. (2002). "When should we use intellectual property rights?," American Economic Review, 92(2): pp. 213--216.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Smith, Vernon L. "An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior" The Journal of Political Economy, v20 n2, 1962, pg. 111--137.Google Scholar
- Smith, Vernon L. "Experimental Economics: Induced Value Theory" American Economic Review, v66, n2, Papers and Proceedings of the Eighty-eighth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 1976), pp. 274--279.Google Scholar
- Smith, Vernon L. "Constructivist and Ecological Rationality in Economics" American Economic Review, v93 n3, June 2003, pg. 465--508.Google Scholar
- Solow, R. (1988). "Growth Theory and After." The American Economic Review, 79(3): pp. 303--317.Google Scholar
- Vaidhyanathan, S. (2001). Copyrights and Copywrongs. New York University Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Vaidhyanathan, S. (2004). Anarchist in the Library, Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
- Varian, H. R. (2000). "Buying, Sharing, and Renting Information Goods", Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(4), pp. 473--488.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Weitzman, M. L. (1998), Recombinant Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 43(2), 330.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Designing markets for open source production of digital culture goods
Recommendations
Designing markets for co-production of digital culture goods
Digital culture products are easily reproduced, easily distributed, and subject to boundless modification, extension and recombination. This sets the stage for the emergence of markets for co-production of cultural content. This paper studies two new ...
Durable Products with Multiple Used Goods Markets: Product Upgrade and Retail Pricing Implications
Used goods markets are currently important transaction channels for durable products. For some durable products, such markets first appeared when retailers started buying back used products from “old” customers and selling them to new ones for a profit (...
Understanding the Role of Trade-Ins in Durable Goods Markets: Theory and Evidence
The act of trading in a used car as partial payment for a new car resonates with practically all consumers. Such transactions are prevalent in many other durable goods markets, ranging from golf clubs to CT scanners. What roles do trade-ins play in ...
Comments