skip to main content
10.1145/1314161.1314179acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdppiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

My agent as myself or another: effects on credibility and listening to advice

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 August 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

People consider other people who resemble them to be more persuasive. Users may consider embodied conversational agents, or ECAs, to be more persuasive if the agents resemble them. In an experimental study, we found that users rated the persuasiveness of agents that resemble them higher than other agents. However, actual advice-taking diverged from this pattern; when users created the agents, users changed their choices less when interacting with the agents that resembled them. We conducted a follow-up study and found that resemblance and self-esteem affect interactions with agents that resemble users. We discuss the use of self-report and behavioral data in evaluations of agent interfaces and how agents that resemble users might foster particular social interactions with a system. We suggest that agents that resemble users may be more persuasive in advising users about their actions and decisions.

References

  1. Aaker, J. L. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (August), 347--356, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Annesi, J. J. Effects of computer feedback on adherence to exercise. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1998, 87, 723--730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bailenson, J. N., Beall, A. C., Blascovich, J., Raimundo, M., and Weisbuch, M. Intelligent Agents Who Wear Your Face: Users' Reactions to the Virtual Self. Proc. of the Third International Workshop on Intelligent Virtual Agents, 2001, 86--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Beggan, J. K. On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 229--237, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Begole, J., Tang, J. C., and Hill, R. Rhythm modeling, visualizations, and applications. UIST, 2003, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Belk, R. W. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139--168, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. BodyMedia. http://www.bodymedia.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Brock, T. C. Communicator-recipient similarity and decision-change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 650--654, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Byrne, D. The Attraction Paradigm. Academic Press, New York, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DeBruine, L. M. Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proc. of The Royal Society, London, B(269), 1307--1312, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Duval, T. S., Duval, V. H., and Mulilis, J.-P. Effects of self-focus, discrepancy between self and standard, and outcome expectancy favorability on the tendency to match self to standard or to withdraw. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 340--348, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Duval, T. S. and Wicklund, R. A. A theory of objective self-awareness. Academic Press, New York, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Eady, Patrick M. and J. Clayton Lafferty. The Subarctic Survival Situation. Experiential Learning Methods, Plymouth, Michigan, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fishkin, K. P., Wang, M., Borriello, G. "A Ubiquitous System for Medication Monitoring," Pervasive 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fogg, B. J. Persuasive Technologies. Communications of the ACM, 42, 27--29. 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gaertner, S. L. and Dovidio, J. F. The subtlety of white racism, arousal, and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 691--707, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Graf H, Casotto E, Ezzat T. Face analysis for synthesis of photorealistic talking heads. Proc. of International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2000, 189--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gratch, J. Ockhmatovskaia, A., Lamothe, F., Marsella, S., Morales, M., van der Werf, R. J., and Morency, L. P. 2006. 6th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents, Marina del Rey, CA, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Henderlong, J.; Lepper, M. R. The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, (2002), 774--795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Koda, T and Maes, P. Agents with Faces: The Effects of Personification of Agents. Proc. CHI 1996, ACM Press (1996), 239--245.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lafferty, J. C. and Pond, A. W. Desert survival situation. Human Synergistics, Plymouth, Michigan, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Morishima, S. Face Analysis and Synthesis. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 18(3). (2001), 26--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nass, C., Kim, E.-Y., and Lee, E.-J. When my face is the interface: An experimental comparison of interacting with one's own face or someone else's face. Proc. CHI 1998, ACM Press (1998), 148--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nemiroff, P. M., and Pasmore, W. A. Lost at sea: A consensus seeking task, Annual Handbook for Facilitators, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Piedmont, R. The revised NEO personality inventory: Clinical and research applications The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Plenum Press, New York, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Rosenberg, M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Revised edition. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Selvarajah, K. and Richards, D. The use of emotions to create believable agents in a virtual environment. Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2005), 13--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Shanteau, J., and Nagy, G. F Probability of acceptance in dating choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 522--533, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J. H., and Waters, K. When the interface is a face. Human Computer Interaction, 11 (1996), 97--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Ukens, L. Adventure in the Amazon. San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Vugt, H. C., Konijn, E. A., Hoorn, J. F., Veldhuis, J. Why Fat Interface Characters Are Better e-Health Advisors. IVA 2006: Marina Del Rey, CA, USA. August 21--23, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. My agent as myself or another: effects on credibility and listening to advice

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        DPPI '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces
        August 2007
        532 pages
        ISBN:9781595939425
        DOI:10.1145/1314161

        Copyright © 2007 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 August 2007

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate27of53submissions,51%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader