Abstract
Reusable object classes are seen as a major benefit of adopting the object-oriented paradigm in the commercial data processing and applications programming worlds. However, without some efficient and effective method of locating previously written classes, this benefit of reuse will be lost. Code location requires the classes to be stored in some retrievable fashion. Such an underlying classification system, together with an associated cataloguing system, appropriate for object libraries, is proposed.
- 1. Auer, K., 1989, Which object-oriented language should we choose?, Hotline on Obj.- Oriented Technol., 1 (1), 1, 3-6.Google Scholar
- 2. Korson, T. and McGregor, J.D., 1991, Technical criteria for the specification and evaluation of object-oriented libraries, Clemson University Technical Report # 91- 112.Google Scholar
- 3. Goldberg, A. and Rubin, K., 1990, Talking to project managers: organizing for reuse, Hotline on Obj.-Oriented Technol., 1 (10), 7-11.Google Scholar
- 4. Meyer, B., 1988, Object-Oriented Software Construction, Prentice-Hall, Hemel Hempstead, 534 pp. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5. Frakes, W.B. and Gandel, P.B., 1990, Representing reusable software, Information and Software Technology, 32, 653-664. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6. Prieto-Diaz, R. and Freeman, P., 1987, Classifying software for reusability, IEEE Software, January 1987, 6-16.Google Scholar
- 7. Dewey, M., 1876, Classification and subject index: for cataloguing and arranging the books and pamphlets of a library, Amherst, Mass.Google Scholar
- 8. Ranganathan, S.R., 1958, Classified Catalogue Code: with additional rules for dictionary catalogue, 4th ed., Madras Library Association, Madras.Google Scholar
- 9. Bliss, H.E., 1940-1953, Bibliographic classification/extended by systematic auxiliary schedule for composite specification and notation, Wilson, New York.Google Scholar
- 10. International Federation for Documentation, 1943 to date (irregular), Brussels Universal Decimal Classification. Complete English ed. 4th International ed., British Standards Institute, London.Google Scholar
- 11. Needham, C.D., 1971, Organising knowledge in libraries: an introduction to information retrieval, 2nd ed. rev., Andre Deutsch, London.Google Scholar
- 12. Kemp, D.A., 1988, Computer-based knowledge retrieval, ASLIB, London.Google Scholar
- 13. Fosket, D.J. and Bury, S., 1982, Concept organisation and Universal Classifications Systems, op cit. p. 35.Google Scholar
- 14. Price, R.T. and Girardi, R., 1990, A class retrieval tool for an object oriented environ ment, in Procs. 3rd Intl. Conf., TOOLS3, Sydney 1990, (eds.) J. Bézivin, B. Meyer J. Potter and M. Tokoro, 26-36.Google Scholar
- 15. Vickery, B.C., 1975, Classification and Indexing in Science, 3rd ed., Butterworths London.Google Scholar
- 16. Henderson-Sellers, B. and Freeman, C., A tool for maintaining object libraries (sub mitted for publication).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Cataloguing and classification for object libraries
Recommendations
Digital libraries
Encyclopedia of Computer ScienceMany views of digital libraries (DLs) stem from what libraries currently do. Traditional libraries collect, organize, provide access to, and preserve objects in their collections. A library collection may include books, magazines, journals, video and ...
Comments