skip to main content
10.1145/1345206.1345259acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesppoppConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Practical experiences with Java software transactional memory

Published:20 February 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we evaluate the emerging Transactional Memory (TM) area by developing a set of Java transactional memory workloads and studying their performance under a Java Software Transactional Memory (STM) system and comparing them to their lock based counterparts. We provide a detailed performance and memory consumption analysis of the overheads of software transactional memory and transactional workloads within a production quality open source Java Runtime system. Additionally, we detail the impact of the various performance optimizations in both workloads and the underlying runtime system to improving both single thread performance and scalability.

References

  1. Ravi Rajwar, James Larus Transactional Memory -- Morgan Claypool, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. http://harmony.apache.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bratin Saha, Ali-Reza Adl-Tabatabai, Richard L. Hudson, Chi Cao Minh, and Benjamin Hertzberg. McRT-STM: A High Performance Software Transactional Memory System for a Multi-Core Runtime. PPoPP'06, March 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A.-R. Adl-Tabatabai, B. Lewis, V. Menon, B. R. Murphy, B. Saha, and T. Shpeisman. Compiler and runtime support for efficient software transactional memory. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Harris and K. Fraser. Language support for lightweight transactions. In OOPSLA '03: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programing, systems, languages, and applications, pages 388--402. ACM Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. D. Carlstrom, J. Chung, A. McDonald, H. Chafi, C. Kozyrakis, and K. Olukotun. The Atomos transactional programming language. In ACM Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Maurice Herlihy, Victor Luchangco, Mark Moir. A Flexible Framework for Implementing Software Transactional Memory. OOPSLA 2006, pages 253--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. JaeWoong Chung, Chi Cao Minh, Brian D. Carlstrom, and Christos Kozyrakis. Parallelizing SPECjbb2000 with Transactional Memory. "Workshop on Transactional Memory Workloads", Ottawa, Canada, June 10, 2006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Practical experiences with Java software transactional memory

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          PPoPP '08: Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGPLAN Symposium on Principles and practice of parallel programming
          February 2008
          308 pages
          ISBN:9781595937957
          DOI:10.1145/1345206

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 20 February 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • poster

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate230of1,014submissions,23%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader