ABSTRACT
We evaluate two systems for automatically generating personalized interfaces adapted to the individual motor capabilities of users with motor impairments. The first system, SUPPLE, adapts to users' capabilities indirectly by first using the ARNAULD preference elicitation engine to model a user's preferences regarding how he or she likes the interfaces to be created. The second system, SUPPLE++, models a user's motor abilities directly from a set of one-time motor performance tests. In a study comparing these approaches to baseline interfaces, participants with motor impairments were 26.4% faster using ability-based user interfaces generated by SUPPLE++. They also made 73% fewer errors, strongly preferred those interfaces to the manufacturers' defaults, and found them more efficient, easier to use, and much less physically tiring. These findings indicate that rather than requiring some users with motor impairments to adapt themselves to software using separate assistive technologies, software can now adapt itself to the capabilities of its users.
- Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S., and Hasbroucq, T. A comparison of tactile, auditory, and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38, 4 (1995), 816--827.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bergman, E. and Johnson, E. Towards Accessible Human-Computer Interaction. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J. P., Kaminsky, R. S., Ladner, R. E., Danielsson, O. M., and Hempton, G. L. Webinsight:: making web images accessible. Proc. Assets '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2006, 181--188. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carter, S., Hurst, A., Mankoff, J., and Li, J. Dynamically adapting GUIs to diverse input devices. Proc. Assets '06. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2006, 63--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dawe, M. Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. Proc. CHI'06. (2006), 1143--1152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fichten, C., Barile, M., Asuncion, J., and Fossey, M. What government, agencies, and organizations can do to improve access to computers for postsecondary students with disabilities: recommendations based on Canadian empirical data. Int J Rehabil Res, 23, 3 (2000), 191--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gajos, K., Christianson, D., Hoffmann, R., Shaked, T., Henning, K., Long, J. J., and Weld, D. S. Fast and robust interface generation for ubiquitous applications. Proc. Ubicomp'05. Tokyo, Japan, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. Supple: automatically generating user interfaces. Proc. IUI'04. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2004, 93--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. and Weld, D. S. Preference elicitation for interface optimization. Proc. UIST '05. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gajos, K. Z., Wobbrock, J. O., and Weld, D. S. Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities. Proc. UIST'07. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Harada, S., Wobbrock, J. O., and Landay, J. A. Voicedraw: A voice-driven hands-free drawing application. Proc. ASSETS'07. ACM Press, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hornof, A., Cavender, A., and Hoselton, R. Eyedraw: a system for drawing pictures with eye movements. Proc. ASSETS'04. ACM Press, New York, NY, 2004, 86--93. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hwang, F., Keates, S., Langdon, P., and Clarkson, J. Mouse movements of motion-impaired users: a submovement analysis. Proc. Assets '04. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004, 102--109. Google ScholarDigital Library
- International Organization for Standardization. 9241-9 Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Part 9: Requirements for non-keyboard input devices (2000).Google Scholar
- Keates, S., Langdon, P., Clarkson, J. P., and Robinson, P. User models and user physical capability. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 12, 2 (2002), 139--169. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koester, H. Abandonment of speech recognition by new users. Proc. RESNA03. Atlanta, Georgia, 2003.Google Scholar
- Law, C., Sears, A., and Price, K. Issues in the categorization of disabilities for user testing. Proc. HCII'05. 2005.Google Scholar
- Littell, R., MIlliken, G., Stroup, W., and Wolfinger, R. SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1996.Google Scholar
- Mankoff, J., Dey, A., Batra, U., and Moore, M. Web accessibility for low bandwidth input. Proc. Assets '02. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 2002, 17--24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nichols, J., Myers, B. A., Higgins, M., Hughes, J., Harris, T. K., Rosenfeld, R., and Pignol, M. Generating remote control interfaces for complex appliances. Proc. UIST'02. Paris, France, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Phillips, B. and Zhao, H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol, 5, 1 (1993), 36--45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Savidis, A. Dynamic software assembly for automatic deployment-oriented adaptation. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 127, 3 (2005), 207--217.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Savidis, A., Antona, M., and Stephanidis, C. A decision-making specification language for verifiable user-interface adaptation logic. International Journal of Software Engineering And Knowledge Engineering, 15, 6 (2005), 1063 -- 1094.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Savidis, A. and Stephanidis, C. Inclusive development: Software engineering requirements for universally accessible interactions. Interacting with Computers, 18, 1 (2006), 71--116. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schuster, C. and Von Eye, A. The relationship of anova models with random effects and repeated measurement designs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 2 (2001), 205--220.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephanidis, C. User interfaces for all: New perspectives into human-computer interaction. In C. Stephanidis, ed., User Interfaces for All, Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001. 3--17.Google Scholar
- Vermunt, J. K. Log-linear Models for Event Histories. Sage Publications, 1997.Google Scholar
- Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1, 6 (1945), 80--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winship, C. and Mare, R. D. Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49, 4 (1984), 512--525.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces
Recommendations
Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with Supple
Today's computer-human interfaces are typically designed with the assumption that they are going to be used by an able-bodied person, who is using a typical set of input and output devices, who has typical perceptual and cognitive abilities, and who is ...
Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities
UIST '07: Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technologyMost of today's GUIs are designed for the typical, able-bodied user; atypical users are, for the most part, left to adapt as best they can, perhaps using specialized assistive technologies as an aid. In this paper, we present an alternative approach: ...
Automatically generating custom user interfaces for users with physical disabilities
Assets '06: Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Comments