Eric Gilbert
ABSTRACT
History repeatedly demonstrates that rural communities have unique technological needs. Yet, we know little about how rural communities use modern technologies, so we lack knowledge on how to design for them. To address this gap, our empirical paper investigates behavioral differences between more than 3,000 rural and urban social media users. Using a dataset collected from a broadly popular social network site, we analyze users' profiles, 340,000 online friendships and 200,000 interpersonal messages. Using social capital theory, we predict differences between rural and urban users and find strong evidence supporting our hypotheses. Namely, rural people articulate far fewer friends online, and those friends live much closer to home. Our results also indicate that the groups have substantially different gender distributions and use privacy features differently. We conclude by discussing design implications drawn from our findings; most importantly, designers should reconsider the binary friend-or-not model to allow for incremental trust-building.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Slides from the presentation
Supplemental material for The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life
- Adamic, L.A. and Glance, N., The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election: Divided They Blog. LinkKDD: Workshop on Link Analysis, 2005. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Atwood, R.A. Telephony and Its Cultural Meanings in Southeastern Iowa. University of Iowa Press, 1984.Google Scholar
- Baym, N.K. Interpersonal Life Online. In L.A. Liewvrouw & S. Livingstone eds. The Handbook of New Media. Sage, London, 2006.Google Scholar
- Bell, P., Reddy, P. and Rainie, L. Rural Areas and the Internet. Pew Internet & American Life Project, February 2004.Google Scholar
- boyd, d.m. Friendster and publicly articulated social networking. Extended abstracts CHI, 2004. 1279--1282. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bradner, E. and Mark, G. Why distance matters: effects on cooperation, persuasion and deception. Proc. CSCW, 2002. 226--235. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carey, J. Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society. Routledge, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
- Castells, M. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donath, J.S. Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community. In Kollock, P. and Smith, M. eds. Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, London, 1998.Google Scholar
- Donath, J. and boyd, d.m. Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22 (4). 71. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ellison, N., Heino, R. and Gibbs, J. Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11 (2).Google Scholar
- Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C. and Lampe, C. The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4).Google Scholar
- Falk, I. and Kilpatrick, S. What is Social Capital? A Study of Interaction in a Rural Community. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (1). 87--110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fischer, C.S. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. University of California Press, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Golder, S., Wilkinson, D. and Huberman, B.A., Rhythms of Social Interaction: Messaging within a Massive Online Network. Conference on Communities and Technologies (CT2007).Google Scholar
- Granovetter, M. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78 (6). 1360--1380.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, L. Rural Voting in the 2004 Election, Carsey Institute: University of New Hampshire, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hancock, J.T., Toma, C. and Ellison, N. The truth about lying in online dating profiles. Proc. CHI, 2007. 449--452. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hart, G. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes (version 2.0), Rural Health Research Center, University of Washington, 2007.Google Scholar
- Hitwise. MySpace Receives 79.7 Percent of Social Networking Visits. http://www.hitwise.com/press-center/hitwiseHS2004/socialnets.php. Accessed Jan. 10, 2008.Google Scholar
- Horrigan, J. Online Communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project, October 2001.Google Scholar
- Horrigan, J. and Murray, K. Rural Broadband Internet use Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2006.Google Scholar
- Isserman, A.M. Competitive Advantages of Rural America in the Next Century. International Regional Science Review, 24 (1). 38--58.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Random House, New York, 1961.Google Scholar
- Kline, R.R. Consumers in the Country: Technology and Social Change in Rural America. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- Laherrere, J. and Sornette, D. Stretched Exponential Distributions in Nature and Economy: 'Fat Tails' with Characteristic Scales. European Physics Journals, B2: 525--539.Google Scholar
- Lampe, C.A.C., Ellison, N. and Steinfield, C. A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proc. CHI, 2007. 435--444. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Larson, K.A. The Social Construction of the Internet: A Rural Perspective. Department of Communication Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 2007, 137.Google Scholar
- Lenhart, A. and Madden, M. Social Networking Websites and Teens: An Overview. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2007.Google Scholar
- Marx, L. The Machine in the Garden: Technology and the Pastoral Ideal in America. Oxford University Press, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
- Norris, P. The Bridging and Bonding Role of Online Communities. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7 (3). 3--13.Google Scholar
- Parker, E.B., Hudson, H.E., Dillman, D.A. and Roscoe, A.D. Rural America in the Information Age: Telecommunications Policy for Rural Development. University Press of America, Lanham, MD, 1989.Google Scholar
- Portes, A. Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24 (1). 1--24.Google Scholar
- Resnick, P. Beyond Bowling Together: Sociotechnical Capital. In Carroll, J. ed. HCI in the New Millennium. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- Toffler, A. The Third Wave. William Morrow, New York, 1981.Google Scholar
- Umble, D.Z. The coming of the telephone to plain country: A study of Amish and Mennonite resistance in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania at the turn of the century. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1991.Google Scholar
- University of Maine. Maine Rural Partners: http://www.mainerural.org. Accessed Jan. 10, 2008.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. Summary File 1 (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3), 2000.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census Bureau. Urban and Rural Definitions, U.S. Census Bureau, 1995.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J. and Hampton, K. Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45 (3). 436.Google Scholar
- Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Isla, I.D.d. and Miyata, K. The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8 (3).Google Scholar
- Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M. and Haythornthwaite, C. Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22. 213--238.Google Scholar
- Whittaker, S., Terveen, L., Hill, W. and Cherny, L. The dynamics of mass interaction. Proc. CSCW, 1998. 257--264. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- The network in the garden: an empirical analysis of social media in rural life
Recommendations
The concurrent and longitudinal relationships between adolescents' use of social network sites and their social self-esteem
The first aim of this study was to investigate the concurrent and longitudinal relationships between adolescents' use of social network sites (SNSs) and their social self-esteem. The second aim was to investigate whether the valence of the feedback that ...
Social Media for Social Good: A Study of Experiences and Opportunities in Rural Australia
#SMSociety17: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & SocietySocial media platforms are espoused as helpful for overcoming geographic isolation for rural people and businesses; connecting them with local, national and global communities. Yet, little research has been conducted to document social media use by ...
Detecting professional versus personal closeness using an enterprise social network site
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsIn this work we analyze the behavior on a company-internal social network site to determine which interaction patterns signal closeness between colleagues. Regression analysis suggests that employee behavior on social network sites (SNSs) reveals ...
Reviews
Guang Yang
With so much press focusing on how online social networks and media have changed everyday life in New York and San Francisco, it is easy to forget that everyone, not just city dwellers, can benefit from new technology. Rural communities have been an active part of the booming social media phenomenon in the past few years, but, until recently, their unique characteristics have been largely neglected in the literature. This paper studies thousands of urban and rural users on MySpace, one of the largest online social networks worldwide. Specifically, Gilbert et al. compare user attributes, such as number of friends, their geographical distribution, interaction among friends (for example, comments), strong/weak ties, and privacy settings. As one would expect, rural users have, in general, fewer online friends and they live closer to the subject. There is also a higher percentage of rural female users compared to their urban counterparts, as "women are the guardians of Internet knowledge in rural communities." Not surprising, either, is the finding that rural users set their profiles to the private mode more often, showing stronger concerns about online privacy. However, it may seem counter-intuitive that no evidence shows that rural users prefer strong ties more than urban users do-they both maintain about the same percentages of strong and weak ties in social relationships. This paper is among the first to carry out a serious study of social media use in rural areas. Through convincing real-life data, it confirms several previous hypotheses and questions others. It also brings up interesting discussions, such as how social networks may play a role in a politically divided nation. Online Computing Reviews Service
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments