skip to main content
research-article

Efficient geographic routing over lossy links in wireless sensor networks

Published:04 June 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recent experimental studies have shown that wireless links in real sensor networks can be extremely unreliable, deviating to a large extent from the idealized perfect-reception-within-range models used in common network simulation tools. Previously proposed geographic routing protocols commonly employ a maximum-distance greedy forwarding technique that works well in ideal conditions. However, such a forwarding technique performs poorly in realistic conditions as it tends to forward packets on lossy links. Based on a recently developed link loss model, we study the performance of a wide array of forwarding strategies, via analysis, extensive simulations and a set of experiments on motes. We find that the product of the packet reception rate and the distance improvement towards destination (PRR × d) is a highly suitable metric for geographic forwarding in realistic environments.

References

  1. Bose, P., Morin, P., Stojmenović, I., and Urrutia, J. 2001. Routing with guaranteed delivery in ad hoc wireless network. Wirel. Netw. 7, 6, 609--616. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bottomley, G., Ottosson, T., and Wang, Y. 2000. A generalized RAKE receiver for interference suppression. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 18, 8, 1536--1545. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cerpa, A., Busek, N., and Estrin, D. 2003. SCALE: A tool for simple connectivity assessment in lossy environments. Tech. Rep, CENS, UCLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cerpa, A., Wong, J., Potkonjak, M., and Estrin, D. 2005. Temporal properties of low power wireless links: modeling and implications on multi-hop routing. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, 414--425. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chen, S., Mitra, U., and Krishnamachari, B. 2005. Cooperative communication and routing over fading channels in wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Networks, Communications and Mobile Computing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuah, C., Tse, D., Kahn, J., and Valenzuela, R. 2002. Capacity scaling in MIMO wireless systems under correlated fading. IEEE Trans. Infor. Theory 48, 3, 637--650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. De Couto, D., Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., and Morris, R. 2005. A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. Wirel. Netw. 11, 4, 419--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Draves, R., Padhye, J., and Zill, B. 2004. Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM '04). ACM, New York, NY, 133--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Finn, G. 1987. Routing and addressing problems in large: metropolitan-scale internetworks. Tech. rep., Information Science Institute, University of Southern California.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Foschini, G. 1996. Wireless communication in a fading environment when using multi-element antennas. Bell Labs Tech. J. 41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganesan, D., Krishnamachari, B., Woo, A., Culler, D., Estrin, D., and Wicker, S. 2003. Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. Tech. rep. UCLA/CSD-TR, 02--0013, Computer Science Department, UCLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Karp, B. and Kung, H. 2000. GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. ACM Press, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Khandani, A. 2004. Cooperative routing in wireless networks. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim, Y., Govindan, R., Karp, B., and Shenker, S. 2005. Geographic routing made practical. In Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Kotz, D., Newport, C., and Elliott, C. 2003. The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research. Tech. rep. TR2003-467, Computer Science, Dartmouth College, ACM, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuhn, F., Wattenhofer, R., and Zollinger, A. 2003. Worst-Case optimal and average-case efficient geometric ad-hoc routing. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking & Computing, 267--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Lee, S., Bhattacharjee, B., and Banerjee, S. 2005. Efficient geographic routing in multihop wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'05). ACM, New York, NY, 230--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Li, C., Hsu, W., Krishnamachari, B., and Helmy, A. 2005. A local metric for geographic routing with power control in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2nd Annual Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECONIOS). 229--239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu, H. and Li, K. 1999. A decorrelating RAKE receiver for CDMA communications overfrequency-selective fading channels. IEEE Trans. Comm. 47, 7, 1036--1045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Mauve, M., Widmer, J., and Hartenstein, H. 2001. A survey on position-based routing in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Netw. 15, 6. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Nikookar, H. and Hashemi, H. 1993. Statistical modeling of signal amplitude fading of indoor radiopropagation channels. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Universal Personal Communications 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rappaport, T. 2002. Wireless Communications. Prentice Hall, PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Seada, K. and Helmy, A. 2005. Geographic protocols in sensor networks. Encyclopedia of Sensors, American Scientific Publishers (ASP).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Seada, K., Helmy, A., and Govindan, R. 2004. On the effect of localization errors on geographic face routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN '04). ACM, New York, NY, 71--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Seada, K., Zuniga, M., Helmy, A., and Krishnamachari, B. 2004. Energy-efficient forwarding strategies for geographic routing in lossy wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 108--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Seidel, S. Y. and Rappaport, T. S. 1992. 914 MHz path loss prediction model for indoor wireless communication in multi floored buildings. IEEE Trans. Arterias and Propagation, 40, 2, 207--217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Silva, F., Heidemann, J., and Govindan, R. 2003. Network Routing API 9.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Szewczyk, R., Osterweil, E., Polastre, J., Hamilton, M., Mainwaring, A., and Estrin, D. 2004. Habitat monitoring with sensor networks. Comm. ACM 47, 6, 34--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Woo, A., Tong, T., and Culler, D. 2003. Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 14--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Zhang, H., Arora, A., and Sinha, P. 2005. Learn on the fly: Quiescent routing in sensor network backbones. Tech. rep., OSU-CISRC-7/05-TR48, The Ohio State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhao, J. and Govindan, R. 2003. Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, 1--13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Zhou, G., He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., and Stankovic, J. 2006. Models and solutions for radio irregularity in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 2, 2, 221--262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zuniga, M. and Krishnamachari, B. 2004. Analyzing the transitional region in low power wireless links. In Proceedings of the IEEE Annual Conference on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON'01). 517--526.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Zuniga, M. and Krishnamachari, B. 2007. An analysis of unreliability and asymmetry in low-power wireless links. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 3, 2, 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Efficient geographic routing over lossy links in wireless sensor networks

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
          ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 4, Issue 3
          May 2008
          210 pages
          ISSN:1550-4859
          EISSN:1550-4867
          DOI:10.1145/1362542
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 June 2008
          • Accepted: 1 November 2007
          • Revised: 1 November 2006
          • Received: 1 March 2006
          Published in tosn Volume 4, Issue 3

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader