skip to main content
10.1145/1386790.1386793acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Optimizing query rewrites for keyword-based advertising

Published:08 July 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

We consider the problem of query rewrites in the context of pay-per-click search advertising. Given a three-layer graph consisting of queries, query rewrites, and the corresponding ads that can be served for the rewrites, we formulate a family of graph covering problems whose goals are to suggest a subset of ads with the maximum benefit by suggesting rewrites for a given query. We obtain constant-factor approximation algorithms for these covering problems, under two versions of constraints and a realistic notion of ad benefit. We perform experiments on real data and show that our algorithms are capable of outperforming a competitive baseline algorithm in terms of the benefit of the rewrites.

References

  1. I. Antonellis, H. G. Molina, C--C. Chang. Simrank: Query rewriting through link analysis of the click graph. Stanford Computer Science Department Technical Report, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. D. Beeferman, A. Berger. Agglomerative clustering of a search engine query log. In Proc. 6th KDD, pages 407--416, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. J. Breese, D. Heckerman, C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proc. 14th UAI, pages 43--52, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Cucerzan, R. W. White. Query suggestion based on user landing pages. In Proc. 30th SIGIR, pages 875--876, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. C. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, T. K. Lancaster, G. W. Furnas, R. A. Harshman. Indexing by latent semantic analysis. In JASIS, 41(6):391--407, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. D. Fain, J. Pedersen. Sponsored search. In Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. U. Feige, V. Mirrokni, J. Vondrak. Maximizing non--monotone submodular functions. In phProc. 48th FOCS, pages 461--471, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. K. Fleisher, M. X. Goemans, V. S. Mirrokni, M. Sviridenko. Tight approximation algorithms for maximum general assignment problems. In phProc. 17th SODA, pages 611--620, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. P. Goundan, A. Schulz. Revisiting the greedy approach to submodular set function maximization. In phManuscript, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Herlocker, J. Konstan, A. Borchers, J. Riedl. An algorithmic framework for performing collaborative filtering. In Proc. 22nd SIGIR, pages 230--237, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. D. S. Hochbaum, A. Pathria. Analysis of the greedy approach in covering problems. Unpublished, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. G. Jeh, J. Widom. Simrank: A measure of structural-context similarity. In Proc. 8th KDD, pages 538--543, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madani, W. Greiner. Generating query substitutions. In Proc. 15th WWW, pages 387--396, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. S. Khot, R. Lipton, E. Markakis, A. Mehta. Inapproximability results for combinatorial auctions with submodular utility functions. In phProc. 1st WINE, pages 92--101, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. S. Khuller, A. Moss, J. Naor. The budgeted maximum coverage problem. phIPL, 70(1):39--45, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. B. Lehmann, D. J. Lehmann, N. Nisan. Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. In phProc. 3rd EC, pages 18--28, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. V. Mirrokni, M. Schapira, J. Vondrak. Tight information-theoretic lower bounds for welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions. phThis proceedings. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. G. L. Nemhauser, L. A. Wolsey. Best algorithms for approximating the maximum of a submodular set function. In phMath. OR, 3(3):177--188, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. L. Nemhauser, L. A. Wolsey, M. L. Fisher. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions. phMath. Prog., 14:265--294, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. W. V. Zhang, X. H. Fei, B. Rey, R. Jones. Query rewriting using active learning for sponsored search. In Proc. 30th SIGIR, pages 853--854, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. W. Zhang, R. Jones. Comparing click logs and editorial labels for training query rewriting. In Workshop on Query Log Analysis, 16th WWW, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Optimizing query rewrites for keyword-based advertising

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '08: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
      July 2008
      332 pages
      ISBN:9781605581699
      DOI:10.1145/1386790

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate664of2,389submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader