skip to main content
research-article

Design space of networked exertion games demonstrated by a three-way physical game based on Table Tennis

Published:06 November 2008Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Physical leisure games can be beneficial to physical as well as mental health and offer a means to connect with others socially. However, players have to be in the same physical location to play. Recent trends in the gaming industry and research labs have started to embrace exertion games: physical games that are expected to be exhausting because they require intense physical effort. However, there is still a lack of a design space that can guide in evaluating such exertion games, help designers in creating future games by maximizing their potential, and inspire new directions in this domain. We present such a design space for exertion games, based on the characteristics of traditional physical games but extended to support distributed interactions. Our motivation is based on the belief that the physicality found in traditional leisure games contributes to facilitating social bonds. We used this design space to develop a networked table tennis-like game called “Table Tennis for Three.” It is played with a real paddle and ball and augmented with a large-scale video-conference. Our prototype shows how the application of the design space can leverage the potential for novel exertion gaming experiences such as supporting three players in three geographically distant locations. An evaluation with 41 participants indicated a successful application of some of the ingredients of the networked exertion games “cocktail”; however, some participants did not enjoy the game, and we present informed interpretations to explain their reactions. With this work we aim to provide other researchers and designers with a practical design space of the main components that can create a networked exertion game, and hence inspire and guide them in designing and evaluating future networked exertion games.

References

  1. Altizer, R. n.d. EyeToy: Play sports preview. http://playstation.about.com/od/previews/a/EyeToyPlaySport.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Garcia-Palacios, A., Villa, H., Perpina, C., and Alcaniz, M. 2000. Presence and reality judgment in virtual environments: A unitary construct? CyberPsychology and Behaviour 3, 327--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Basdogan, C., Ho, C., Srinivasan, M. A., and Slater, M. 2000. An experimental study on the role of touch in shared virtual environments. ACM Trans. Computer Human Interaction 7, 4, 443--460. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bauman, A. n.d. Three million members by 2010. Fitness Australia. http://www.fitnessaustralia.com.au/_uploads/res/243_2135.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Benford, S., Schnadelbach, H., Koleva, B., Gaver, B., Schmidt, A., Boucher, A., Steed, A., Anastasi, R., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T., and Gellersen, H. 2003. Sensible, sensable and desirable: A framework for designing physical interfaces, Tech. Rep. Equator-03-003, Equator, Feb. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernhaupt, R., Eckschlager, M., and Tscheligi, M. 2007. Methods for evaluating games--How to measure usability and user experience in games. In Workshop ACE 2007. http://ace2007.org/evaluatinggames.html. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bernhaupt, R., IJsselsteijn, W., Mueller, F., Tscheligi, M., and Wixon, D. 2008. Evaluating user experiences in games. In Workshop CHI 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bodypad. http://www.bodypad.com/eng/Index.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., and Sengers, P. 2007. How emotion is made and measured. Int. J. Human Computer Studies 65, 4, 275--291. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Borning, A. and Travers, M. 1991. Two approaches to casual interaction over computer and video networks. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (CHI'91), ACM, New York, 13--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Brucker-Cohen, J. and Huang, S. n.d. NetGym. http://fargo.itp.tsoa.nyu.edu/~jonah/middle_images/work/expertext.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, J. 2007. Flow in games (and everything else). Commun. ACM 50, 4 (April), 31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Coleman, D. and Iso-Ahola, S. E. 1993. Leisure and health: The role of social support and self-determination. J. Leisure Research 25, 2, 111--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper and Row, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Damasio, A. 2000. The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. Vintage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dance Dance Revolution. 2005. Ultramix http://www.xbox.com/en-US/ddr/default.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Dancing Stage Fusion. n,d, http://uk.gs.konami-europe.com/game.do?idGame=70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Esbjornsson, M., Brown, B., Juhlin, O., Normark, D., Ostergren, M., and Laurier, E. 2006. Watching the cars go round and round: designing for active spectating. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'06, Montreal), ACM, New York, 1221--1224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Eyetoy. n.d. http://www.eyetoy.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gizmag. 2004. Haptic arm wrestling hits the net. http://www.gizmag.com.au/go/3562/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Glover, D. and Midura, D. 1992. Team Building Through Physical Challenges. Human Kinetics Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Grimley, D., Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., Vlais, L. M., and DiClemente, C. C. 1994. The transtheoretical model of change. In Changing the Self: Philosophies, Techniques, and Experiences, T.M. Brinthaupt and R.P. Lipka (eds.), State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 201--227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Huysman, M. and Wulf, V. (eds.). 2004. Social Capital and Information Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ishii, H., Wisneski, C., Orbanes, J., Chun, B., and Paradiso, J. 1999. PingPongPlus: Design of an athletic-tangible interface for computer-supported cooperative play. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'99), ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Jackson, S. and Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1999. Flow in Sports: The Keys to Optimal Experiences and Performances. Human Kinetics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, T. and Biocca, F. 1997. Telepresence via television: Two dimensions of telepresence may have different connections to memory and persuasion. J. Computer-Mediated Communication 3, 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Kneidinger, L., Maple, T., and Tross, S. 2001. Touching behavior in sport: Functional components, analysis of sex differences, and ethological considerations. J. Nonverbal Behavior 25, 1 (Spring).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Kraut, R. E., Fish, R. S., Root, R. W., and Chalfonte, B. L. 1990. Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. S. Oskamp and S. Spacapan (eds.), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 145--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuchera, B. 2007. Gaming your way into better shape. http://arstechnica.com/articles/culture/gettingfit.ars/5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehrer, J. 2006. How the Nintendo Wii will get you emotionally invested in video games. Seedmagazine.com. Brain & Behavior (Nov. 16). http://www.seedmagazine.com/news/2006/11/a_console_to_make_you_wiip.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Letts, G. n.d. Top 10 reasons to play table tennis. http://tabletennis.about.com/od/whyplaytabletennis/tp/reasonstoplay.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin, J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., and Strub, H. 2005. Fish'n'Steps: Encouraging physical activity with an interactive computer game. In Proceedings of the Ubicomp '05 Conference. LNCS 4206, Springer, Berlin, 261--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Lindt, I., Ohlenburg, J., Pankoke-Babatz, U., and Prinz, W. 2006. Combining multiple gaming interfaces in “epidemic menace.” In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (CHI'06), ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Liu, Y. and Burn, J. 2006. A framework to evaluate the performance and satisfaction of virtual teams in on-line learning environment. J. Universal Science and Technology of Learning, 19--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Magerkurth, C. 2004. Augmenting the virtual domain with physical and social elements. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advancements in Computer? Entertainment Technology (Singapore, June 3--5). ACM, New York, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Marriott, M. 2004. Long-distance sports. The New York Times, Aug. 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1945. Phenomenology of Perception: An Introduction (2nd rev. ed. 2002), Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Mokka, S., Väätänen, A., and Välkkynen, P. 2003. Fitness computer games with a bodily user interface. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing (Pittsburgh, PA), ACM, New York, 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Mueller, F. 2002. Exertion interfaces: Sports over a distance for social bonding and fun. MS thesis, Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Mueller, F., O'Brien, S., and Thorogood, A. 2007. Jogging over a Distance. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07), ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Mueller, F., Agamanolis, S., and Picard, R. 2003. Exertion interfaces: Sports over a distance for social bonding and fun. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'03, Fort Lauderdale, FL), ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Mueller, F., Cole, L., O'Brien, S., and Walmink, W. 2006. Airhockey over a distance—A networked physical game to support social interactions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advancements in Computer Entertainment Technology (Singapore, June 3--5). ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Mueller, F., Stevens, G., Thorogood, A., O'Brien, S., and Wulf, V. 2007. Sports over a distance. J. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, Special Issue on Movement-Based Interaction. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Nardi, B. 2005. Beyond bandwidth: Dimensions of connection in interpersonal communication. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 14, 91--130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. NetAthlon. 2007. http://www.fitcentric.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. New York Hall of Science - Press Room. http://nyhallsci.org/nyhs-pressroom/nyhs-pressreleases/pr-tug_of_war.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. O'Brien, S., Mueller, F., and Thorogood, A. 2007. Jogging the distance. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'07), ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Pate, R. R., Pratt, M., Blair, S. N., Haskell, W. L., Macera, C. A., Bouchard, C., Buchner, D., Ettinger, W., Heath, G. W., King, A. C., Kriska, A., Leon, A. S., Marcus, B. H., Morris, J., Paffenbarger, R. S., Patrick, K., Pollock, M. L., Rippe, J. M., Sallis, J., and Wilmore J.H. 1995. Physical activity and public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. J. American Medical Association 273, 5, 402--407.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone. Touchstone, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Reeves, S., Benford, S., O'Malley, C., and Fraser, M. 2005. Designing the spectator experience. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'05), ACM, New York, 741--750. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Rotter, J. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. J. Personality 35, 4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Schmidt, K. and Rodden, T. 1996. The Design of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Groupware Systems. North-Holland Elsevier, Amsterdam, 157--176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Shriver, E. K. n.d. Special Olympics Sport-Specific Sport Skills Program Guide. http://www.specialolympics.org/NR/rdonlyres/e4zuoyhmp7svermg7yizq5wioqt2575g32gc24l3zu2gj3vqj4nm dql2ne5ibrwrktim632pvgfbiighz6gu72yx7tf/Table+Tennis.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Turberville, J. 2004. Table tennis ball speed. http://www.jayandwanda.com/tt/speed.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Vossen, D. 2004. The nature and classification of games. Avante 10, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. White, T. and Back, D. n.d. Telephonic arm wrestling. http://www.normill.ca/artpage.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Wii Sports. n.d. http://wii.nintendo.com/software_wii_sports.html Yourselffitness. http://www.yourselffitness.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Design space of networked exertion games demonstrated by a three-way physical game based on Table Tennis

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format