skip to main content
10.1145/1409944.1409947acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

eBay in the Sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 September 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Market-driven dynamic spectrum auctions can drastically improve the spectrum availability for wireless networks struggling to obtain additional spectrum. However, they face significant challenges due to the fear of market manipulation. A truthful or strategy-proof spectrum auction eliminates the fear by enforcing players to bid their true valuations of the spectrum. Hence bidders can avoid the expensive overhead of strategizing over others and the auctioneer can maximize its revenue by assigning spectrum to bidders who value it the most. Conventional truthful designs, however, either fail or become computationally intractable when applied to spectrum auctions. In this paper, we propose VERITAS, a truthful and computationally-efficient spectrum auction to support an eBay-like dynamic spectrum market. VERITAS makes an important contribution of maintaining truthfulness while maximizing spectrum utilization. We show analytically that VERITAS is truthful, efficient, and has a polynomial complexity of O(n3k) when n bidders compete for k spectrum bands. Simulation results show that VERITAS outperforms the extensions of conventional truthful designs by up to 200% in spectrum utilization. Finally, VERITAS supports diverse bidding formats and enables the auctioneer to reconfigure allocations for multiple market objectives.

References

  1. Buddhikot, M., and Ryan, K. Spectrum management in coordinated dynamic spectrum access based cellular networks. In Proc. of IEEE DySPAN (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Clarke, E. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice XI (1971), 17--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cramton, P. Spectrum auctions. Handbook of Telecommunications Economics (2002), 605--639.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gandhi, S., Buragohain, C., Cao, L., Zheng, H., and Suri, S. A general framework for wireless spectrum auctions. In Proc. of IEEE DySPAN (2007).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Groves, T. Incentive in terms. Econometrica 41 (1973), 617--631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Huang, J., Berry, R., and Honig, M. Auction mechanisms for distributed spectrum sharing. In Proc. of 42nd Allerton Conference (2004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ileri, O., Samardzija, D., and Mandayam, N. B. Demand responsive pricing and competitive spectrum allocation via a spectrum server. In Proc. of IEEE DySPAN (2005).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jain, K., Padhye, J., Padmanabhan, V. N., and Qiu, L. Impact of interference on multi-hop wireless network performance. In Proc. of MobiCom (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kothari, A., Parke, D. C., and Suri, S. Approximately-strategyproof and tractable multi-unit auctions. In Proc. of the ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (2003), pp. 166--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lehmann, D., O'allaghan, L., and Shoham, Y. Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. J. ACM 49, 5 (2002), 577--602. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mu'alem, A., and Nisan, N. Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions: extended abstract. In Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence (2002), pp. 379--384. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., and Vazirani, V. Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge Uniersity Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ryan, K., Aravantinos, E., and Buddhikot, M. A new pricing model for next generation spectrum access. In Proc. of TAPAS (2006). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Sakai, S., Togasaki, M., and Yamazaki, K. A note on greedy algorithms for the maximum weighted independent set problem. Discrete Appl. Math. 126, 2-3 (2003), 313--322. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Vickery, W. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 16 (1961), 8--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wang, W., Li, X., and Wang, Y. Truthful multicast routing in selfish wireless networks. In Proc. of MobiCom (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. eBay in the Sky: strategy-proof wireless spectrum auctions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiCom '08: Proceedings of the 14th ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking
      September 2008
      374 pages
      ISBN:9781605580968
      DOI:10.1145/1409944

      Copyright © 2008 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 September 2008

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader