skip to main content
10.1145/1411759.1411763acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshotmobileConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Urban sensing systems: opportunistic or participatory?

Published:25 February 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The development of sensing systems for urban deployments is still in its infancy. An interesting unresolved issue is the precise role assumed by people within such systems. This issue has significant implications as to where the complexity and the main challenges in building urban sensing systems will reside. This issue will also impact the scale and diversity of applications that are able to be supported. We contrast two end-points of the spectrum of conscious human involvement, namely participatory sensing, and opportunistic sensing. We develop an evaluation model and argue that opportunistic sensing more easily supports larger scale applications and broader diversity within such applications. In this paper, we provide preliminary analysis which supports this conjecture, and outline techniques we are developing in support of opportunistic sensing systems.

References

  1. Google StreetView, http://maps.google.com/help/maps/streetview/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Metrosense project. http://metrosense.cs.dartmouth.edu.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mit Senseable City. http://senseable.mit.edu/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sensorplanet. http://www.sensorplanet.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. T. Abdelzaher, Y. Anokwa, P. Boda, J. Burke, D. Estrin, L. Guibas, A. Kansal, S. Madden, and J. Reich. Mobiscopes for human spaces. IEEE Pervasive Computing - Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems, 6(2), April--June 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Begole, J. C. Tang, R. B. Smith, and N. Yankelovich. Work rhythms: Analyzing visualizations of awareness histories of distributed groups. In Proceedings of CSCW '02, pages 334--343, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. M. Brick, P. D. Brick, S. Dipko, S. Presser, C. Tucker, and Y. Yuan. Cell phone survey feasibility in the u.s.: Sampling and calling cell numbers versus landline numbers. Public Opinion Quarterly, pages 1--17, March 7 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. T. Campbell, S. B. Eisenman, N. D. Lane, E. Miluzzo, and R. A. Peterson. People-centric urban sensing. In ACM/IEEE WICON 2006. Boston, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. R. Douceur and T. Moscibroda. Lottery trees: motivational deployment of networked systems. In SIGCOMM '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, pages 121--132, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B. Hull, V. Bychkovsky, Y. Zhang, K. Chen, M. Goraczko, A. Miu, E. Shih, H. Balakrishnan, and S. Madden. Cartel: a distributed mobile sensor computing system. In SenSys '06: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 125--138, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. R. Hull, B. Kumar, D. Lieuwen, P. F. Patel-Schneider, A. Sahuguet, S. Varadarajan, and A. Vyas. Enabling context-aware and privacy-conscious user data sharing. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM'04), volume 00, pages 187--198, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. A. Kansal, S. Nath, J. Liu, and F. Zhao. Senseweb: An infrastructure for shared sensing. IEEE MultiMedia, 14(4):8--13, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. S. Lederer, J. I. Hong, A. K. Dey, and J. A. Landay. Personal privacy through understanding and action: Five pitfalls for designers. In Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, volume 8, pages 440--454, November 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. E. Miluzzo, N. D. Lane, S. B. Eisenman, and A. T. Campbell. Cenceme - injecting sensing presence into social networking applications. In G. Kortuem, J. Finney, R. Lea, and V. Sundramoorthy, editors, EuroSSC, volume 4793 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1--28. Springer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. C. Noyes. With new camera phones, you never know who's watching. Quality Cities, January/February 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. S. Olson, et al. Preferences for privacy sharing: Results and directions, in CREW Technical Report, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. L. Palen and P. Dourish. Unpacking privacy for a networked world. In Proceedings of CHI'03, pages 129--136, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. E. Paulos and T. Jenkins. Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres. In CHI '05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 341--350, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. S. Reddy, A. Parker, J. Hyman, J. Burke, D. Estrin, and M. Hansen. Image browsing, processing, and clustering for participatory sensing: lessons from a dietsense prototype. In EmNets '07: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on Embedded networked sensors, pages 13--17, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. S. Singh. Indians talk too much on mobile. http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Indian_talk-time_461_minmth/articleshow/2118956.cms, June 13 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. M. Srivastava, M. Hansen, J. Burke, A. Parker, S. Reddy, G. Saurabh, T. Schmid, K. Chang, M. Allman, V. Paxson, and D. Estrin. Network system challenges in selective sharing and verification for personal, social, and urban-scale sensing applications. In HotNets '06, pages 37--42, Irvine, California, USA, November 29 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. V. H. Tuulos, J. Scheible, and H. Nyholm. Combining web, mobile phones and public displays in large-scale: Manhattan story mashup. In Pervasive, pages 37--54, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Urban sensing systems: opportunistic or participatory?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        HotMobile '08: Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Mobile computing systems and applications
        February 2008
        106 pages
        ISBN:9781605581187
        DOI:10.1145/1411759

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 February 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate96of345submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader