Elizabeth D. Mynatt
ABSTRACT
This paper describes work to provide mappings between X-based graphical interfaces and auditory interfaces. In our system, dubbed Mercator, this mapping is transparent to applications. The primary motivation for this work is to provide accessibility to graphical applications for users who are blind or visually impaired. We describe the design of an auditory interface which simulates many of the features of graphical interfaces. We then describe the architecture we have built to model and transform graphical interfaces. Finally, we conclude with some indications of future research for improving our translation mechanisms and for creating an auditory “desktop” environment.
- BBV90.L.H. Boyd, W.L. Boyd, and G.C. Vanderheiden. The graphical user interface: Crisis, danger and opportunity. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, pages 496-502, December 1990.Google Scholar
- BGB91.Bill Buxton, Bill Gaver, and Sara Bly. The Use of Non-SpeechAudio at the Interface. Tutorial Presented at CHI'91. April 1991.Google Scholar
- Bur92.David Burgess. Low Cost Sound Spatilization. To appear in UIST '92: The Fifth Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology and Technolgy, November 1992.Google Scholar
- Bux86.William Buxton. Human interface design and the handicapped user. In CHI' 86 Conference Proceedings, pages 291-297, 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Che53.E.C. Cherry. Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, pages 61-62.Google Scholar
- HC86.Jr. D. Austin Henderson and Smart K. Card. Rooms: The use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface. ACM Transactions on Graphics, pages 211- 243, July 1986. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edw89.Allstair D. N. Edwards. Modeling blind users' interactions with an auditory computer interface. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, pages 575-589, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gav89.William W. Gaver. The sonicfinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human Computer Interaction, 4:67-94, 1989.Google ScholarDigital Library
- HTAP90.HumanWare, Artic Technologies, ADHOC, and The Reader Project. Making good decisions on technology: Access solutions for blindness and low vision. In Closing the Gap Conference, October 1990. Industry Experts Panel Discussion.Google Scholar
- Lad88.Richard E. Ladner. Public law 99-506, section 508, electronic equipment accessibility for disabled workers. In CHI'88 Conference Proceedings, pages 219-222, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- LC91.Lester E Ludwig and Michael Cohen. Multidimensional audio window management. international Journal of Man-Machine Studies, Volume 34, Number 3, pages 319-336, March 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- LPC90.Lester E Ludwig, Natalio Pincever, and Michael Cohen. Extending the notion of a window system to audio. Computer, pages 66-72, August 1990. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ME91.Elizabeth Mynatt and Keith Edwards. New metaphors for nonvisual interfaces. In Extraordinary Human-Computer Interaction, 1991. Draft chapter accepted for upcoming book.Google Scholar
- ME92.Elizabeth Mynatt and W. Keith Edwards. The Mercator Environment: A Nonvisual Interface to X Windows and Unix Workstations. GVU Tech Report GIT-GVU-92-05. February 1992.Google Scholar
- Pet91.Chris D. Peterson. Editres-a graphical resource editor for x toolkit applications. In Conference Proceedings, Fifth Annual X Technical Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, January, 1991.Google Scholar
- Sch87.Robert W. Scheifler. X window system protocol specification, version I I. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, Massachusetts, 1987.Google Scholar
- Van89.G.C. Vanderheiclen. Nonvisual alternative display techniques for output from graphicsbased computers. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1989.Google Scholar
- WWF88.E.M. Wenzel, EL. Wightman, and S.H. Foster. Development of a Three-Dimensional Auditory Display System. SIGCHI Bulletin, 20, pages 557-564, 1988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yor89.Bryant W. York, editor. Final Report of the Boston University Workshop on Computers and Persons with Disabilities, 1989.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Mapping GUIs to auditory interfaces
Recommendations
Transforming graphical interfaces into auditory interfaces for blind users
Although graphical interfaces have provided a host of advantages to the majority of computer users, they have created a significant barrier to blind computer users. To meet the needs of these users, a methodology for transforming graphical interfaces ...
Comments