skip to main content
10.1145/1435473.1435487acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Wireless sensor network deployment for water use efficiency in irrigation

Published:01 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Australia is facing a severe water shortage due to below-average rainfall received over the past decade. The agricultural industry is significantly affected by this shortage due to its high water demands. It is important to adopt changes in agricultural practices and employ innovative ideas for the agricultural industry to maintain its current rate of production. Sensor technology can be used to study soil dynamics based on information gathered at regular intervals, and the data collected can be used as feedback to improve irrigation efficiency. In this paper, we describe our experiences in the design, development and deployment of a wireless sensor network to improve water use efficiency for pasture production. Sensor nodes, called sensor pods, were developed using off the shelf components. The design of the sensor pod was a challenging task as the installation has to withstand seasonal weather changes, and be resistant to damages that may be inflicted by cattle in the field. Each sensor pod measures soil moisture, temperature and humidity. Granular matrix sensors are used to measure soil moisture at three different ground depths. Temperature and humidity are measured using the Tmote Sky's on-board sensors. 70 sensor pods were deployed at the TIAR (Tasmanian Institute for Agricultural Research) Elliott Research Farm near Burnie, in the North West of Tasmania, Australia, at the end of December 2007. Preliminary results are now available. The data gathered will be used to develop efficient data evaluation techniques so that irrigation regimes can be automated. This will lead to precision agricultural techniques involving the close monitoring of the field state, and the use of real time data to drive more efficient irrigation practices.

References

  1. R. Allen. Calibration of the watermark 200ss soil water potential sensor to fit the 7-19-96 "calibration 3" table from irrometer. http://www.kimberly.uidaho.edu/water/swm/calibration_watermark2.pdf, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Australia. Australian Water Resources 2005- A Baseline Assessment of Water Resources for the National Water Initiative. 95 Northbourne Ave, Canberra ACT 2600, Australia, July 2007. Key Findings of the Level 2 Assessment: Summary Results.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Baggio. Wireless sensor networks in precision agriculture. In ACM workshop Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks, Stockholm, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Burrell, T. Brooke, and R. Beckwith. Vineyard computing: Sensor networks in agricultural production. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3(1):38--45, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. K. Hennessy, B. Fitzharris, N. Bates, S. Harvey, L. Howden, J. Hughes, J. Salinger, and R. Warrick. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, chapter Australia and New Zealand, pages 507--540. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. G. M. Lodge and S. R. Murphy. Root depth of native and sown perennial grass-based pastures, north-west slopes, new south wales. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46:337--345, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. A. Margulis, D. McLaughlin, D. Entekhabi, and S. Dunne. Land data assimulation and estimation of soil moisture using measurements from the southern great plains 1997 field experiment. Water Resource Research, 38(12):1299--1316, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sentilla. Sentilla corporation:. http://www.sentilla.com, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Upchurch, J. Mahan, D. Wanjura, and J. Burke. Concepts in deficit irrigation: Defining a basis for effective management. In P. R. Walton, editor, Impacts of Global Climate Change, World Water and Environmental Resources Congress. Environmental and Water Resources Institute (EWRI) of the American Society of Civil Engineers, American Society of Civil Engineers, 15--19 May 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. T. Wark, P. Cork, P. Sikka, L. Klingbeil, Y. Guo, C. Crossman, P. Valencia, D. swain, and G. Bishop-Hurley. Transforming agriculture through pervasive wireless sensor networks. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 6(2):50--57, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Wireless sensor network deployment for water use efficiency in irrigation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        REALWSN '08: Proceedings of the workshop on Real-world wireless sensor networks
        April 2008
        79 pages
        ISBN:9781605581231
        DOI:10.1145/1435473

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 April 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6of7submissions,86%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader