skip to main content
10.1145/1460412.1460419acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Robust topology control for indoor wireless sensor networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 November 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Topology control can reduce power consumption and channel contention in wireless sensor networks by adjusting the transmission power. However, topology control for wireless sensor networks faces significant challenges, especially in indoor environments where wireless characteristics are extremely complex and dynamic. We first provide insights on the design of robust topology control schemes based on an empirical study in an office building. For example, our analysis shows that Received Signal Strength Indicator and Link Quality Indicator are not always robust indicators of Packet Reception Rate in indoor environments due to significant multi-path effects. We then present Adaptive and Robust Topology control (ART), a novel and practical topology control algorithm with several salient features: (1) ART is robust in indoor environments as it does not rely on simplifying assumptions about the wireless properties; (2) ART can adapt to variations in both link quality and contention; (3) ART introduces zero communication overhead for applications which already use acknowledgements. We have implemented ART as a topology layer in TinyOS 2.x. Our topology layer only adds 12 bytes of RAM per neighbor and 1.5 kilobytes of ROM, and requires minimal changes to upper-layer routing protocols. The advantages of ART have been demonstrated through empirical results on a 28-node indoor testbed.

References

  1. CC1000 Single Chip Very Low Power RF Transceiver, Texas Instruments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver, Texas Instruments.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Srinivasan and P. Levis, "RSSI is under appreciated," in EmNets, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Lin, J. Zhang, G. Zhou, L. Gu, J. A. Stankovic, and T. He, "ATPC: adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks," in SenSys, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. D. Son, B. Krishnamachari, and J. Heidemann, "Experimental study of the effects of transmission power control and blacklisting in wireless sensor networks," in IEEE SECON, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. Woo, T. Tong, and D. Culler, "Taming the underlying challenges of reliable multihop routing in sensor networks," in SenSys, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. N. Reijers, G. Halkes, and K. Langendoen, "Link layer measurements in sensor networks," in IEEE MASS, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. G. Zhou, T. He, S. Krishnamurthy, and J. A. Stankovic,"Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks," in MobiSys, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Lal, A. Manjeshwar, F. Herrmann, E. Uysal-Biyikoglu, and A. Keshavarzian, "Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks," in IEEE GLOBECOM, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. D. Ganesan, B. Krishnamachari, A. Woo, D. Culler, D. Estrin, and S. Wicker, "Complex behavior at scale: An experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks," UCLA Computer Science Department, Tech. Rep., 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Zhao and R. Govindan, "Understanding packet delivery performance in dense wireless sensor networks," in SenSys, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. L. Li, J. Y. Halpern, P. Bahl, Y.-M. Wang, and R. Wattenhofer, "Analysis of a cone-based distributed topology control algorithm for wireless multi-hop networks," in ACM PODC, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Li, J. C. Hou, and L. Sha, "Design and analysis of an MST-based topology control algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1195--1206, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. D. M. Blough, M. Leoncini, G. Resta, and P. Santi, "The k-neighbors approach to interference bounded and symmetric topology control in ad hoc networks," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 5, no. 9, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. M. Burkhart, P. von Rickenbach, R. Wattenhofer, and A. Zollinger, "Does topology control reduce interference?" in MobiHoc, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. M. Blough, M. Leoncini, G. Resta, and P. Santi, "Topology control with better radio models: Implications for energy and multi-hop interference," Perform. Eval., vol. 64, no. 5, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y. Gao, J. C. Hou, and H. Nguyen, "Topology control for maintaining network connectivity and maximizing network capacity under the physical model," in INFOCOM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Fonseca, O. Gnawali, K. Jamieson, S. Kim, P. Levis, and A. Woo. The collection tree protocol (CTP). {Online}. Available: http://www.tinyos.net/tinyos-2.x/doc/html/tep123.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Cerpa, J. L. Wong, M. Potkonjak, and D. Estrin, "Temporal properties of low power wireless links: modeling and implications on multi-hop routing," in MobiHoc, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. {Online}. Available: http://www.tinyos.net/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Klues, G. Hackmann, O. Chipara, and C. Lu, "A component based architecture for power-efficient media access control in wireless sensor networks," in SenSys, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. {Online}. Available: http://www.cse.wustl.edu/wsn/index.php?title=MLAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Robust topology control for indoor wireless sensor networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SenSys '08: Proceedings of the 6th ACM conference on Embedded network sensor systems
        November 2008
        468 pages
        ISBN:9781595939906
        DOI:10.1145/1460412

        Copyright © 2008 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 November 2008

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate174of867submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader