skip to main content
research-article

Localization and routing in sensor networks by local angle information

Published:11 February 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Location information is useful both for network organization and for sensor data integrity. In this article, we study the anchor-free 2D localization problem by using local angle measurements. We prove that given a unit disk graph and the angles between adjacent edges, it is NP-hard to find a valid embedding in the plane such that neighboring nodes are within distance 1 from each other and non-neighboring nodes are at least distance √2/2 away. Despite the negative results, however, we can find a planar spanner of a unit disk graph by using only local angles. The planar spanner can be used to generate a set of virtual coordinates that enable efficient and local routing schemes such as geographical routing or approximate shortest path routing. We also proposed a practical anchor-free embedding scheme by solving a linear program. We show by simulation that it gives both a good local embedding, with neighboring nodes embedded close and non-neighboring nodes far away, and a satisfactory global view such that geographical routing and approximate shortest path routing on the embedded graph are almost identical to those on the original (true) embedding.

References

  1. Aspnes, J., Goldenberg, D., and Yang, Y. R. 2004. On the computational complexity of sensor network localization. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Algorithmic Aspects of Wireless Sensor Networks (ALGOSENSORS), 32--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas, P. and Ye, Y. 2004. Semidefinite programming for ad hoc wireless sensor network localization. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 46--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Borg, I. and Groenen, P. 1997. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bose, P., Morin, P., Stojmenovic, I., and Urrutia, J. 1999. Routing with guaranteed delivery in ad hoc wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Mehtods for Mobile Computing and Communications (DialM'99), 48--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Breu, H. and Kirkpatrick, D. G. 1998. Unit disk graph recognition is NP-hard. Comput. Geometry Theory Appl. 9, 1-2, 3--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bryant, V. W. 1989. Straight line representation of planar graphs. Elem. Math. 44, 64--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bǎdoiu, M., Demaine, E. D., Hajiaghayi, M. T., and Indyk, P. 2004. Low-Dimensional embedding with extra information. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, 320--329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Doherty, L., Ghaoui, L. E., and Pister, S. J. 2001. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Infocom), vol. 3. 1655--1663.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Efrat, A., Erten, C., Forrester, D., Iyer, A., and Kobourov, S. G. 2006. Force-Directed approaches to sensor localization. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Algorithm Engineering and Experiments (ALENEX), 108--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fáry, I. 1948. On straight line representations of planar graphs. Acta Scientiarum Mathematicarum (Szeged) 11, 229--233.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao, J., Guibas, L. J., Hershberger, J., Zhang, L., and Zhu, A. 2001. Geometric spanner for routing in mobile networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'01), 45--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gavoille, C., Peleg, D., Pérennes, S., and Raz, R. 2001. Distance labeling in graphs. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 210--219. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Goldenberg, D. K., Bihler, P., Yang, Y. R., Cao, M., Fang, J., Morse, A. S., and Anderson, B. D. O. 2006. Localization in sparse networks using sweeps. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'06). ACM Press, New York, 110--121. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gotsman, C. and Koren, Y. 2004. Distributed graph layout for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Grpah Drawing. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., and Collins, J. 2001. Global Positioning Systems: Theory and Practice, 5 ed. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Karp, B. and Kung, H. 2000. GPSR: Greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'00), 243--254. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kuhn, F., Moscibroda, T., and Wattenhofer, R. 2004. Unit disk graph approximation. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing, 17--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kuhn, F., Wattenhofer, R., Zhang, Y., and Zollinger, A. 2003. Geometric ad-hoc routing: Of theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC'03). ACM Press, New York, 63--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kuhn, F. and Zollinger, A. 2003. Ad-hoc networks beyond unit disk graphs. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing, 69--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Li, X.-Y., Calinescu, G., and Wan, P.-J. 2002. Distributed construction of planar spanner and routing for ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom), 1268--1277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, Z., Trappe, W., Zhang, Y., and Nath, B. 2005. Robust statistical methods for securing wireless localization in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'05). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Moore, D., Leonard, J., Rus, D., and Teller, S. 2004. Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'04). ACM Press, New York, 50--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Moscibroda, T., O'Dell, R., Wattenhofer, M., and Wattenhofer, R. 2004. Virtual coordinates for ad hoc and sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Foundations of Mobile Computing, 8--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Niculescu, D. and Nath, B. 2001. Ad hoc positioning system (APS). In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference and Exhibition on Global Telecommunications (GlobeCom), 2926--2931.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Niculescu, D. and Nath, B. 2003. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom), Vol. 22. 1734--1743.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Niculescu, D. and Nath, B. 2004. Error characteristics of ad hoc positioning systems (APS). In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc'04), 20--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Priyantha, N. B., Chakraborty, A., and Balakrishnan, H. 2000. The cricket location-support system. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'00), 32--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Rajaraman, R. 2002. Topology control and routing in ad hoc networks: A survey. SIGACT News 33, 2, 60--73. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rao, A., Papadimitriou, C., Shenker, S., and Stoica, I. 2003. Geographic routing without location information. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'03), 96--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Savvides, A., Han, C.-C., and Strivastava, M. B. 2001. Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'01), 166--179. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Savvides, A., Park, H., and Strivastava, M. B. 2003. The n-hop multilateration primitive for node localization problems. Mobile Netw. Appl. 8, 443--451. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Shang, Y., Ruml, W., Zhang, Y., and Fromherz, M. P. J. 2003. Localization from mere connectivity. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiCom'03), 201--212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. So, A. M.-C. and Ye, Y. 2005. Theory of semidefinite programming for sensor network localization. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA'05). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Whitehouse, K. and Culler, D. 2006. A robustness analysis of multi-hop ranging-based localization approximations. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'06). ACM Press, New York, 317--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Whitehouse, K., Karlof, C., Woo, A., Jiang, F., and Culler, D. 2005. The effects of ranging noise on multihop localization: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN'05). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zhou, G., He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., and Stankovic, J. A. 2004. Impact of radio irregularity on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys'04). ACM Press, New York, 125--138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Localization and routing in sensor networks by local angle information

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
        ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 5, Issue 1
        February 2009
        307 pages
        ISSN:1550-4859
        EISSN:1550-4867
        DOI:10.1145/1464420
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 February 2009
        • Accepted: 1 February 2008
        • Revised: 1 October 2007
        • Received: 1 March 2007
        Published in tosn Volume 5, Issue 1

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader